And surely that's a legitimate tactic? Snooker's often a long game, involving endurance, patience and tactical play etc. If Ronnie falters when that's brought into it then that's a successful tactic which has been used by his opponent, no?
And peak Hendry swept up in the 90s in a way not even Ronnie ever really did...Ronnie has a certain longevity Hendry struggled to manage, since his successes faded in his 30s, but to suggest a guy who won the World Championship five times in a row, with it not having been won more than twice in a row by anyone since then, would get undoubtedly wiped off the table by Ronnie without doubt if both players were in their primes is ridiculous.