You're obviously a better side than last year, even if the results haven't quite shown it due to some bad finishing and very poor luck.
I'm not convinced that the difference is due to Jose rather than just adding Zlatan, Pogba, and (for a while at least) Bailly. Give LVG those three and he might be doing just as well, putting aside the personal conflicts he would have had with Ibra.
Just as LVG's sides should have been better than Moyes's team, Mourinho's sides should be better and more successful than LVG's simply based on the level of investment. If LVG was a failure and Mourinho is only moderately better than LVG then Mourinho should be considered a failure since that moderate improvement was likely to be produced by spending another 150M pounds (or whatever it was) in players no matter who the manager happened to be.
Yes, I am saying that some of us 'told you so'. That Louis Van Gaal would bring success in the longer term despite his flaws.
One of the reasons was his extensive experience in pressure cooker clubs. Another was his amazing knowledge of football and his commitment to total football. And he has never been a weak manager and has shown the same quality of Sir Alex - managers have to be strong than the players.
LVG was never going to be given Sir Alex's long-term generous stretch of time by footballing standards to re-build the Manchester United team - that was from a bygone era and the United administration should forever be thanked for sticking by the younger Alex Ferguson when he was struggling to implement a new style and mentality.
However, it was disgraceful the way he LVG was dumped as if he were just any manager who couldn't produce instant results in a middle table club that will never win anything because of the sense of entitlement of the players and administration who set such high standards for managers yet don't live up to them.
Some of us stated long before Mourinho came to Old Trafford that he was not the right person for United. Temperamentally. In terms of footballing style. He's had a very good career - yes. But he should not have been brought in to replace Louis Van Gaal so soon even if some of you thought it was a great idea.
United will not regain its glory days under Mourinho - is it sinking in now or do some of you still want to justify getting rid of the man who would have put United back on the right track?
You mention Zlatan, Pogba and Bailly as the reasons for us being better than under Van Gaal, but Mourinho's the reason we got them in the first place. Herrera is less of a risk taker than Pogba is and he was not trusted by Van Gaal.
This is a fair point. Mourinho clearly is a bigger draw in player recruitment than LVG (or, obviously, Moyes) and that is part of the value he brings as a manager.
I can't say if Mourinho will be successful, but LvG better? Are you really serious? or just ....
So many Jose Sycophants here!! Nobody is discounting that Jose is a top manager. The OP just pointed out that based on the result at united, LVG seems the better at getting results. Yes it’s still early days but its fine to analyze and criticize a manager’s progress. Especially when he seems in danger of missing fouth with the most expensive team on earth . Let’s not forget that this manager took a team of Champions and turned them to pure shite. So he has that ability to feck things up.
Some of you have been admiring Mourinho from a far so much that you are scared to criticize him when he is here. If I compare his first season to LVG’s first season, I have to say I enjoyed LVG’s start more. Also, I personally hate the excuses for him and his fans when we lose. It was Rooney’s fault first, then it was Mkhi’s fault, then the refs, Conte’s celebration …when will some of you stop making excuses for him? Some are still blaming LVG for our poor performances!! C’mon.
LVG signings were just dreadful and we are still paying for that machine gun approach of having 3 targets for one position and not just fighting for your preferred option! Darmain, Depay, Blind, Rojo, Morgan, Bastian, ADM, Falcao, Martial, Romero. That's more than a right few bob there and they make up a good core of our squad! He was bidding apparently for the Watford centre forward and the Arsenal second choice right back ffs! Only Martial and Blind (Romero ok) have come close to justifying their price tags and that's a horrible % rate. In the process (pardon the pun) we have got rid of better players in Nani Rafael Hernandez Evans Welbeck and Fletcher! So although Jose has to deal with what he has got LVG did more damage than Moyes in my opinion.
The Jose's appointment is to bring instant success, that is obvious. And, Jose is yet to achieve that.I'm sure Jose will prove a more successful manager for us than LVG. But the lack of consistency from our board is really causing us to stall IMO. There doesn't seem to be a person in charge who understand the sport or how to build a long term project. We've gone through from Moyes to Lvg to Mourinho, three managers who couldn't be further apart in their footballing filosophies. That means that every time we change the squad needs a overhaul because it's built to suit the ideas of the former manager.
If we'd gone from Van Gaal to a Stam or a De Boer then maybe we would get rolling faster, not that we'd nessecarily be any more successful in the long term but I would find it very comforting to see that there was a grander vision which we were working towards. If this pattern continues I can see us struggle as for example Chelsea struggled for a period after Mourinhos first tenure there. We'll always only be as good as our next manager who'll always suffer under the weight of his predecessors work.
I think that we could actually learn from Man City and in this regard and how they've worked toward the Guardiola appointment.
The Jose's appointment is to bring instant success, that is obvious. And, Jose is yet to achieve that.
Jose is not for long term success, that is for sure.Well there are no titles to be won by december so I don't see how he could. No manager can guarantee instant success, but I don't want instant success I want long term success. Mourinhos football is the complete opposite of Van Gaals football, it will take time for him to assemble the parts he needs and then get them to function the way he wants them to.
Jose is not for long term success, that is for sure.
Jose is not for long term success, that is for sure.
I didn't see him as a long term option for us either which is one of the reasons I actually didn't want him here but he is still a relatively young manager. He could be in it for the long term if everything works out.
Nice kneejerk, shite thread. feck off with your bullshit hindsight post. Mourinho is ten times the manager LvG wishes he would be. Your condescending tone regarding how LvG was the right man is fecking laughable. You wouldn't have even made this thread if we beat West Ham (which we would have with a bit more luck). Stop being edgy.
I don't see it, since he joined United I have seen a lot more of him and he is too nervous, he is too affected by what happens around him.
I can't say if Mourinho will be successful, but LvG better? Are you really serious? or just ....
Salty asf
LVG wishes to be good as Jose Do you know LVG was Jose's mentor? I doubt he would want to be as good as Jose. Some of you who then say Jose is more tactically capable than his own mentor & a manager who has played varying formations & tactics whilst uprising some of the best players of 2 & half decades - is worse than Jose simply because he splashes money on one tactic + one formation that has proved to be successful at times..
Jose's football style is old & easy to counter play these days & he cannot survive for longer than 3 years because he cannot freshen things up.
LVG always on the other hand comes in to big clubs in ruts - similar to states of clubs Jose leaves behinds and freshens them up in the right direction.
It's really what people watch football for - I watch it as a tactical sport & therefore think LVG is & proven to be quality for long term success. You may watch it for entertainment & success value - therefore Jose is your man.
Let's not tell each other who is better or worse because we all have different ways of actually watching & assessing football.
He's just taken on his dream job, which happens to be attempting to get a deeply dysfunctional mega-club back on track, immediately after a season from hell with Chelsea. Of course he'll be feeling the pressure. If he can get us back winning trophies he'll be feeling a lot better about life, that's for damn sure. If he can't, then he won't be sticking round anyway.
Are you LVG's daughter? Otherwise we seem to have been watching a different season last year.
I commend your positivity but I don't think that it's linked with winning trophies. It's just his temperament, I don't think that he is made for huge clubs, Atletico would be a better fit.
I don't know how you can be so confident in your psychoanalysis. He's been chewed up and spat out by toxic clubs for whom that is the norm but was adored (and very happy) at Inter and Porto, only leaving to fulfil his own ambitions.
Manchester United would be closer in environment to these latter two clubs, only on a grander scale. If he is successful here then we've every reason to assume he'll stick around for another few years. Or at the very least, renew his contract. If he's not successful then that's not an issue.
You know that we are doing the same thing? And I'm not confident in my "psychoanalysis", I'm not even sure if adding two and two together is a psychoanalysis.
And United are closer to Real Madrid than Porto or Inter, the spotlight is the same, the ambition is the same, the weight of history is the same. At Inter, he was bigger than the club, he was the king, at United or Real Madrid he isn't, he is like any other manager but with a lot more of pressure and expectations.
That's why I said that Atletico was a better fit because it's comparable to Inter.
You seem to be coming to conclusions based on your assessment of his "temperament". That's what I mean by psychoanalysis. I'm not going to pretend to know the guy well enough to make predictions based on his temperament but I do think that the environment at United will be very different to what he experienced at Chelsea and Madrid because he won't have to be a buffer between an elected president and the fans and he won't have an owner coming down to the training pitch and telling him who to pick. Both those clubs have massive managerial turnover for reasons which have nothing to do with Jose Mourinho. In fact, he's unlikely to find another club where a manager has a better chance of becoming "the king" as this archetype was the norm for 20+ years when Fergie was in charge.
I bet, when he was being interviewed for the job at Barca, he said the samething, that it was his dream job.I commend your positivity but I don't think that it's linked with winning trophies. It's just his temperament, I don't think that he is made for huge clubs, Atletico would be a better fit.
Just sitting through our matches for 90 minutes every week was painful enough.
Honestly not exaggerating that in my 30+ years watching United I have never come as close as I did last season to falling out of love with football altogether. It was absolutely brutal. This season has been all sunshine and rainbows by comparison. Of course it helps that I'm old enough to remember life before Fergie and the possibility that the pleasure you get from watching a football team was about more than just accumulating points.
Which is kind of ironic, considering how one of the most widespread anxieties when Mourinho was hired was that our football would be dour and uninspiring to watch. So far, it's been anything but. With maybe 2 or 3 exceptions.
Just sitting through our matches for 90 minutes every week was painful enough.
Honestly not exaggerating that in my 30+ years watching United I have never come as close as I did last season to falling out of love with football altogether. It was absolutely brutal. This season has been all sunshine and rainbows by comparison. Of course it helps that I'm old enough to remember life before Fergie and the possibility that the pleasure you get from watching a football team was about more than just accumulating points.
Which is kind of ironic, considering how one of the most widespread anxieties when Mourinho was hired was that our football would be dour and uninspiring to watch. So far, it's been anything but. With maybe 2 or 3 exceptions.
My post or the thread?
Just sitting through our matches for 90 minutes every week was painful enough.
Honestly not exaggerating that in my 30+ years watching United I have never come as close as I did last season to falling out of love with football altogether. It was absolutely brutal. This season has been all sunshine and rainbows by comparison. Of course it helps that I'm old enough to remember life before Fergie and the possibility that the pleasure you get from watching a football team was about more than just accumulating points.
Which is kind of ironic, considering how one of the most widespread anxieties when Mourinho was hired was that our football would be dour and uninspiring to watch. So far, it's been anything but. With maybe 2 or 3 exceptions.