- Joined
- Aug 25, 2014
- Messages
- 148
I don't like this scoring goals and creating chances malarkey.
Bring back possession stats and playing Nick Powell upfront!
Bring back possession stats and playing Nick Powell upfront!
Sums up my thoughts perfectly.
Just sitting through our matches for 90 minutes every week was painful enough.
Honestly not exaggerating that in my 30+ years watching United I have never come as close as I did last season to falling out of love with football altogether. It was absolutely brutal. This season has been all sunshine and rainbows by comparison. Of course it helps that I'm old enough to remember life before Fergie and the possibility that the pleasure you get from watching a football team was about more than just accumulating points.
Which is kind of ironic, considering how one of the most widespread anxieties when Mourinho was hired was that our football would be dour and uninspiring to watch. So far, it's been anything but. With maybe 2 or 3 exceptions.
Yes, I am saying that some of us 'told you so'. That Louis Van Gaal would bring success in the longer term despite his flaws.
No we don't have the same eyes as each other or the same brain.
I don't see it, since he joined United I have seen a lot more of him and he is too nervous, he is too affected by what happens around him.
I see the opposite right now, especially in the way he talks about the club. I'm happy with the atmosphere he is creating. United against the world , not me against the world.
Is that why he has been throwing players under the bus all season?
Is that why he has been throwing players under the bus all season?
Nar, that's so he makes them raise their standards.
He has no problem gushing about them & rewarding them when they do.
Yes, I am saying that some of us 'told you so'. That Louis Van Gaal would bring success in the longer term despite his flaws.
One of the reasons was his extensive experience in pressure cooker clubs. Another was his amazing knowledge of football and his commitment to total football. And he has never been a weak manager and has shown the same quality of Sir Alex - managers have to be strong than the players.
LVG was never going to be given Sir Alex's long-term generous stretch of time by footballing standards to re-build the Manchester United team - that was from a bygone era and the United administration should forever be thanked for sticking by the younger Alex Ferguson when he was struggling to implement a new style and mentality.
However, it was disgraceful the way he LVG was dumped as if he were just any manager who couldn't produce instant results in a middle table club that will never win anything because of the sense of entitlement of the players and administration who set such high standards for managers yet don't live up to them.
Some of us stated long before Mourinho came to Old Trafford that he was not the right person for United. Temperamentally. In terms of footballing style. He's had a very good career - yes. But he should not have been brought in to replace Louis Van Gaal so soon even if some of you thought it was a great idea.
United will not regain its glory days under Mourinho - is it sinking in now or do some of you still want to justify getting rid of the man who would have put United back on the right track?
I didn't not follow United in SAF early day (being too young myself in a non football fan family), so I can't compare, just here saying I am not against LVG and I would defend him vs pro Moyes crowd that LVG is a better coach and have a plan. However, LVG tried to change the club identity which is big task and impossible given the length of his time. Trying to coach a new identity into a big club with largest fanbase 2 years away from someone like SAF is crazy and 99.99% won't work out well. The football culture clash show in the team then the supporters. Mourinho was not my first choice (Ancelotti was) but I accepted his appointment and think he just needs time to get us back on track, and he's a better coach for us than LVG.Just sitting through our matches for 90 minutes every week was painful enough.
Honestly not exaggerating that in my 30+ years watching United I have never come as close as I did last season to falling out of love with football altogether. It was absolutely brutal. This season has been all sunshine and rainbows by comparison. Of course it helps that I'm old enough to remember life before Fergie and the possibility that the pleasure you get from watching a football team was about more than just accumulating points.
Which is kind of ironic, considering how one of the most widespread anxieties when Mourinho was hired was that our football would be dour and uninspiring to watch. So far, it's been anything but. With maybe 2 or 3 exceptions.
We witnessed the most shocking and tumescent Manchester United last season under Van Gaal since 30 + years maybe even more.
Incredible that people still bring up that old fool.
Can I suggest then:
What if you spent 25k on modding your sedan into an ATV then decided 2 years later you wanted a drag racer and modded it to the tune of another 15k? Because that's what's happened to our team across the past 3 seasons... He's inherited a squad that had 250m spent on it, but given he's going a different direction then it's not 250m of progress invested in his book to add on, but 150m to fix what he sees as issues.But it still adds up, if I buy a car 25k and spend 15k on it, I should expect to have a better car. You don't compare 150m with 250m but what Mourinho inherited and what he added to it.
Now, we are in late November the team could and should improve drastically during the next months, so it's not the time to analyze Mourinho's spending or decide that he isn't improving the team. The end of the season is the right time to do that.
This thread!My post or the thread?
I gather then that you have never heard of Dave Sexton. There's something about Manchester United managers with the first name of David.
Both 'Daves' managed to do just about nothing but bore the fans when they weren't confusing them and the players, and in David Moyes' case alienate a very loyal fanbase and waste the multi million pound assorted talent he had at his disposal. A decent man, David Moyes, but completely unsuited for the job.
Especially when he said things in public that Sir Alex and some United managers before him would never have said except privately. Both Daves had the playing material to work with but didn't utilise it. Mourinho also seems to have this characteristic of saying too much in public including criticising players that Sir Alex and Louis VG understood was a no go.
You won't get a more concrete example of how the shackles have come off since the Van Gaal shitfest than Hererra's last two assists. How often in the previous two years did you see one of our CM's getting to the byline? I'm willing to bet the answer is not once. His insistence on players holding their positions, no matter the circumstances, was fecking infuriating and contrary to what you would see with pretty much any other team around. Dark ages football, it really was.
You won't get a more concrete example of how the shackles have come off since the Van Gaal shitfest than Hererra's last two assists. How often in the previous two years did you see one of our CM's getting to the byline? I'm willing to bet the answer is not once. His insistence on players holding their positions, no matter the circumstances, was fecking infuriating and contrary to what you would see with pretty much any other team around. Dark ages football, it really was.
The worst part was the "two touches" rule, it was killing all spontaneity and inventivity.
Or telling strikers to "always run to near post, always". Both Martial's goals last night were scored by doing the opposite.
His control freakery was so extreme it was though he genuinely believed he could turn football into an extremely expensive version of Pro Evo. Only much much worse to watch.
100% agree. Some of LvG's ideas were brilliant but needed to have been embedded into the players a long time ago. I remember watching the Ajax of old, they were tactically sound in epic level. He would have made an awesome U23 manager for us!To be fair, I think that his philosophy is good at academy level, if you ignore results and try to create players tactically and technically sound. When they have that basis, they are ready to play for anyone in pretty much all sorts of systems.
To be fair, I think that his philosophy is good at academy level, if you ignore results and try to create players tactically and technically sound. When they have that basis, they are ready to play for anyone in pretty much all sorts of systems.
I don't see how the rigidity he insisted in the way his team plays is conducive to having good technique. You'll just end up with players so afraid of expressing themselves that they'll lose whatever flair they once had. Or really bad at first time passing because they always take two touches etc. etc. I'm sure his methods must have worked at some point but they seem incredibly outdated nowadays.
I would argue that the philosophy itself makes players over-think, which starts the vicious circle.LVG has strict technical drills in which players have to control-pass as fast as possible, they have to respect that combo and develop their ability to control the ball under all circumstances. And that's not outdated at all, that's how Barcelona or Ajax players play but they tend to push the thing with controlling the ball with one foot and passing it with the other, it always them to create space for themselves, control the opposition pressing and control the rhythm of the game.
The problem with that philosophy is that when your players aren't confident, they think too much and butcher easy things.
I would argue that the philosophy itself makes players over-think, which starts the vicious circle.
Only when they are not used to or comfortable in it, like every other system really.
Yes, I am saying that some of us 'told you so'. That Louis Van Gaal would bring success in the longer term despite his flaws.
One of the reasons was his extensive experience in pressure cooker clubs. Another was his amazing knowledge of football and his commitment to total football. And he has never been a weak manager and has shown the same quality of Sir Alex - managers have to be strong than the players.
LVG was never going to be given Sir Alex's long-term generous stretch of time by footballing standards to re-build the Manchester United team - that was from a bygone era and the United administration should forever be thanked for sticking by the younger Alex Ferguson when he was struggling to implement a new style and mentality.
However, it was disgraceful the way he LVG was dumped as if he were just any manager who couldn't produce instant results in a middle table club that will never win anything because of the sense of entitlement of the players and administration who set such high standards for managers yet don't live up to them.
Some of us stated long before Mourinho came to Old Trafford that he was not the right person for United. Temperamentally. In terms of footballing style. He's had a very good career - yes. But he should not have been brought in to replace Louis Van Gaal so soon even if some of you thought it was a great idea.
United will not regain its glory days under Mourinho - is it sinking in now or do some of you still want to justify getting rid of the man who would have put United back on the right track?