Bloody hell, it's crashed and all
If they'll lock threads I wouldn't put it past them to just turn the server off.
RAWK Goes into Meltdown 2014/2015 - The "We go again" Edition
- Thread starter Pexbo
- Start date
If they'll lock threads I wouldn't put it past them to just turn the server off.
A RAWKite said:
A RAWKite said:
threatened to ban some united posters after the 2nd goal 
LOL. RAWK is the gift that keeps on giving.
They were better than us first half so who knows, maybe they would actually beat us at full strength. Our squad isn't exactly fantastic but we'll see come the league games eh?
Its fair to say that. It's also fair to say that this game has no bearing whatsoever on how we'd do against them in a competitive match. Certainly we've learned that we won't cope very well with teams that close us down, but I actually think Van Gaal expected that and wanted to see how we'd do.
Bingo. The game was a very good indicator of how things are without being something the players couldn't really handle at this stage of time.
Hopefully we'll get some fresh faces in to combat our weaknesses. God lord I hope we get some fresh faces in to combat our weaknesses.
My Twitter feed is full of people pretending really, really hard that they aren't arsed.
I don't know how they'd celebrate winning the CL, but walking around passively shaking each others hands isn't how I'd do it.
I don't know how they'd celebrate winning the CL, but walking around passively shaking each others hands isn't how I'd do it.
Either did they in the second half to be fair!
You and me both, brother.The worry for liverpool is their lack of goals in their team, early days for everyone but they have spent 89 million and more to come, but none of it has been spent too improve replacing suarez. We found out when losing ronaldo what it did to us relying on rooney, and liverpool may find out over relying on sturridge to score them the goals could cost them a top 4. I looked at united tonight, they had allot of gears, and players to hit the back of the net in allot of different ways.
And before we get carried away, remember...they were without players they haven't signed yet.
Well,yeah. I think Van Gaal had seen enough from the first half to know that sitting back and letting them play, whilst trying to play out from the back ourselves wasn't gonna work against a team prepared to do that much running. He'll have told the lads to get about them in the second half and it worked. I think he's just testing all possible scenarios, as is his wont.
I would be worried for liverpool with what they have spent their money on, more quantity than quality in their ranks. We still need that CM signing to bring it all home
Re: Liverpool vs Manchester United - Tuesday 5th 1:00am
« Reply #1777 on: Today at 03:18:19 AM »
It continuous to amaze me how we were able to mount a title challenge with the carcass of Glen Johnson as a starter.
« Reply #1777 on: Today at 03:18:19 AM »
It continuous to amaze me how we were able to mount a title challenge with the carcass of Glen Johnson as a starter.
What are they banging about absent players? We too were missing RvP, Januzaj and Welbeck. Not to mention Fellaini
Except 2-3 changes their first XI for first game will be same. 2 changes in defense and Sturridge instead of Lambert.
Except 2-3 changes their first XI for first game will be same. 2 changes in defense and Sturridge instead of Lambert.
I'm losing faith in Jones..Think we also need a beast ball playing CB! Blackett should be given his chance with the firsts in the new season, hasn't made any mistakes, where as Jones and Smalling are full of them.
If only we'd had Vidal, Hummels, Ronaldo and Thor.
They're losing their shit over the full backs, they want to sign two full backs and a CB apparently and a striker.
So, so juvenile. Love it.Liverpool are such a bitter club. I hate it but I love it at the same time cause they're so fun to wind up!
What are they banging about absent players? We too were missing RvP, Januzaj and Welbeck. Not to mention Fellaini
Except 2-3 changes their first XI for first game will be same. 2 changes in defense and Sturridge instead of Lambert.
I think the problem there is, you've attempted to look at it logically. Unfortunately you won't make much progress doing that, it's not the way the RAWK works.
Lets be honest, it means little, but it's funny as feck when they were the ones insinuating we'd be preparing excuses for when they won.
What was their reaction to Lambert's performance?
Not many posts, but they aren't impressed.
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=314440.560
Basically they thought he was very poor and much 'slower' than last season. Calling for another striker to be signed.
Will VG take that chance and throw blackett to the wolves, he may sink or swim, but that is the chance any manager takes with young players. If VG thinks blackett could very much be a young player with man's shoulders, he may not buy a defender.
Rawkite Warrior :