There was a young man called Luis
Who, with a lack food, he thought "phooey"
So he took a big bite
Out of Chiellini's left arm, not his right
And said "This is nicer than Chop Suey"
RAWK Goes Into Meltdown | 2013/14
- Thread starter Buchan
- Start date
There was a young man called Luis
Who, with a lack food, he thought "phooey"
So he took a big bite
Out of Chiellini's left arm, not his right
And said "This is nicer than Chop Suey"
fukk ya
Hammann said the other night on RTE that the ban won't be extended so Uruguay have a "free shot at it". They should have recourse to an extension. Who decides these things?
Agreed, it's not like it was out of the blue either, he has form, all those crying that Liverpool are innocent, we they had a choice twice, they bought him whilst serving his first bite ban in Holland and had chance to flog him last summer after his second bite, you take your chances right, if a player is injured on international duty, club games aren't suspended til the guy is fit again. Had it been any other offence or an other player, I would have some sympathy (say Sterling had bitten Suarez), but chances are the ban would have been less, the unprecedented thing is this is his third bite, it's a weird thing to do and he deserves his punishment, unfortunately for Liverpool they need to suck it up too, they took their chance on Luis and he let them down so ultimately they deserve the punishment too.
That's totally wrong, you go in ethic comission and can be suspended but it's not automatic. If you bite someone in the french ligue, we don't know what will be the sanction, but probably a dozen of games.
And if you break someone leg without making a foul you won't be suspended
Photoshop/Paint fans: enjoy ~
That's his mugshot. Every year, all scousers have to send one in to their local police station to save time later on.
Have you seen the way all the RAWK posters talk about United as if they have been a midtable team for 10 years and Liverpool have been dominating for that period ? You wouldn't think it was the other way round apart from 1 season in like 25. I am truly embarrassed some of them occupy the same city as me.
Absolute nonsense. You could make a perfectly good tackle that's unfortunate, like Evans v Holden, and you're out for 8 months?
No, Italy were knocked out.
Therein lies the flaw with the French system then.
Doubt that. Chiellini has stated that Suarez' punishment is excessive. He feels for Suarez and his family, he says. Quite the gent, it would seem.
I feel for Suarez' family too, if every time he loses his temper he bites someone.
Stevie Me
there once was a player from pool
who discovered bite marks on his tool
he blamed chielini for the bites on his weenie
but they tested it and found suarez drool.
OH GOD this is hilarious, I mean honestly Ive never ever read anything so insane in all my years.
AHAHAHAHHAHAHA brilliant.
It hoenstly has everything you want in an insane ramble on RAWK we have to save it, its just my favorite ever.
He lists candidates for "revenge bites" as if Saurez is doing a service to the greater good with his ratty instincts.
He then goes on to say that Saurez was clutching his own teeth begging FIFA to remove them for him HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA.
Oh and theres his commercialization of gum shields that he believes could become a global celebration.
OH GOD and then tops it off by saying " he will launch us to glory" he obviously missed the news that Saurez lawyer said hes agreed to join Barca.
Sense:
RAWKite said:
Seems the punishment could be more servere based on the luck of the player getting tackled. If he is lucky and escapes injury you get away with it, regardless of how malicious your intent was.
I will be disappointed with them if they at-least don't start an online petition and bring back the jerseys. And of course, spam with emails the shit of FIFA, FA, Evra and Mr. Ferguson. Especially the last two, they are to be blamed more than anyone else because they started Suarez' hate with their lies.
I think it would be fecking beautiful if they sold him for about 25m to some continental team. Even better to go to the thrift shop after where I am sure you could pick up a ladies 4x Suarez jersey on the cheap. Probably be great to use as a dropcloth when painting.
Prety sure they will get 60m+ if they decide to sell him. And IMO they should sell him because the next time he'll decide to eat the flesh of man on a football pitch, FA will be merciless and give him an one year ban (if not more).
If / when Suarez leaves this summer, he'll be a hero in their eyes and the only reason why he left will be because of the English media / FIFA..
I think maybe 50 would get him given his penchant for being suspended. If I am Pool I move him pronto.
Yep. He now has no human rights at all. He is no longer allowed to do anything. This includes practice freedom of movement, freedom of speech, have a right to a fair trial etc.
Some nice reading on those quoted RAWK posts, actually.
Better get Peter Gabriel on the horn.
Yup, me neither! even without the CL football.
Your limerick had the same ending as mine, but you posted yours before me. You are therefore deemed superior to me in every single way and for that, for ruining my life, I say "fukk ya".
TBH not particularly, especially in relation to Liverpool's midfielders (unless Henderson somehow does a Ramsey).
More to the point though you have no idea how Herrera will adapt to the PL, so to say categorically that he will be world class is ironic when it was a response to the RAWK post.
I can't be certain how Herrera will adapt to the Epl but i definately have an idea after watching alot of games he's played in the last few seasons.
RAWK seems to be taking the absolutely incredible stance that
a) Biting isn't that bad and shouldn't be punished harshly
b) Despite this, the fact that Suarez bites people means he needs a support network and is in danger of cracking up
Extra bonus material
I like it when they pretend to be law experts.
Liverpool fans fail to understand that it is within FIFA's power to ban players worldwide in exceptional circumstances and have done so before. A player committing his third offence for the same despicable action (plus a racist charge behind him) is exceptional.
A ban from International matches alone would not have been punishment enough.
Also, if Liverpool think it is 'unfair' that they are being punished for something he did for Uruguay....would it have been fair for the ban to apply just to Uruguay games when the severity was influenced by previous offences at club level? No, no it wouldn't be fair.
Why do Liverpool love playing the victims?
A ban from International matches alone would not have been punishment enough.
Also, if Liverpool think it is 'unfair' that they are being punished for something he did for Uruguay....would it have been fair for the ban to apply just to Uruguay games when the severity was influenced by previous offences at club level? No, no it wouldn't be fair.
Why do Liverpool love playing the victims?