RAWK Goes Into Meltdown | 2013/14

Revan said:
They can't do it (unless they had put a clause on the new contract that they won't pay him if he gets banned for these kind of things).
Click to expand...


I hope they did. But my point was more sarcasm. Ofcourse this isn't unfair to Liverpool like some of them has been saying.
 
I really missed this thread this year, but the last couple of months have been great.
 
A bit of common sense of RAWK

I can't believe people are suprised by this,

This is his third offence for the same fecking thing!!

Is a small bite worse than headbutting someone.... no, but if a players completely nuts someone (not a Pardue head rub) they'll get a 7/8 game ban tops, if he does it again probably 10/12 games but to do it a third time would incur a huge ban, just like this one,

Yes we can winge, Ferdinand got this, Cantona got that but did either of those players miss a drugs and or kick a fan again after their initial punishment? No. I imagine if they did their punishment would be doubled at least,

This incident cannot be taken in isolation, it is the third time he's done and who knows if it'll be his last because a 10 game ban didn't seem to change him
Click to expand...

Followed by more nonsense

Liverpool should as of this year start refusing to send their players to International football. If the chance of players getting banned from domestic games then why take the chance?
Click to expand...

Blessing in disguise, he can't be sold.
Click to expand...

*IF* they have proven that he bit Chiellini (I only say that, as I am yet to see any evidence from the front, showing any teeth, and the still image of Chiellini's shoulder looks "odd" to me), but if they have, then I agree that he should get an unprecedented punishment, as it would be his third time.

However - the punishment should ONLY affect Uruguay and Luis directly - Not Liverpool, for whom he wasn't playing at the time.

I could understand a 1 or even 2 YEAR ban from internationals, but FIFA should have no say over the club.
As far as club football goes, if they want to punish the player, then impose a fine equivalent to those 4 months that he goes unpaid for.

Added to that is the fact that they have effectively banned Liverpool from having any say on the matter, by only allowing appeals from either Luis or Uruguay and it simply compounds the issue.

Finally, let's not forget that this could have a huge financial effect on Liverpool FC as well:
Not only are we now less likely to progress in the Champions League (the draw doesn't matter - they have removed a central player), as he is banned from ALL football activity and banned from even entering ANY stadium, we can't even use him to meet/greet/incentivise potential sponsors, etc..

Whilst I accept that he needed to be punished (if they proved it) - This ban goes WAY too far in my opinion.
He should be banned for internationals, fined and ORDERED to accept psychiatric evaluation and assistance.
Click to expand...
 
Was Cantona banned for playing for France? I know he never got on with the French manager anyway, I'm assuming he was still banned?
 
The irony of their global jobbies calling foul because it's Uruguay therefore nothing to do with them is priceless. The european ban impinging on every English club because of heinous crimes in Belgium by "you know who" must have been a figment of the imagination.

Their blind ignorance is never ending.
 
Yep, any football activity. They have no right to do that, none, nada. Fifa have made it up, in their little fecking dipshit brains they've imagined a rule and think they can enforce it.
feck that, that's going beyond what they can do. That's stopping somebody enjoying life, keeping fit, socialising, spending time with their children and so forth and so forth, they actually can't do that.
Click to expand...
 
soap said:
Was Cantona banned for playing for France? I know he never got on with the French manager anyway, I'm assuming he was still banned?
Click to expand...

Yes he was banned from all football. Club and country.

Their was even controversy about him playing friendlies behind closed doors. Think United got around it by playing matches only 40 mins each half.
 
James Redburn said:
The irony of their global jobbies calling foul because it's Uruguay therefore nothing to do with them is priceless. The european ban impinging on every English club because of heinous crimes in Belgium by "you know who" must have been a figment of the imagination.

Their blind ignorance is never ending.
Click to expand...
not the thread or the place to be discussing that incident.
 
Suárez will have been suspended for 34 matches since 2010 without receiving a red card on the pitch.

Helps RAWK with their delusion.
 
Some of their concerns are valid, Liverpool have to pay wages while he takes a holiday for 4 Months, as the maximum possible wage punishment is only two weeks. Although it's their player, this tournament has nothing to do with them, he'll not be able to play 9 games for Uruguay and more than 15 games for Liverpool.

Still, it's funny because it's Liverpool
 
Liverpool still being linked with many players. Maybe they feel safer on Suarez's team.
 
Why would anyone buy him with his record - he's missed a full season out of the last 4, with various bans - WHEN, he does it again, the authorities will throw the book at him.
 
fishfingers15 said:
Some of their concerns are valid, Liverpool have to pay wages while he takes a holiday for 4 Months, as the maximum possible wage punishment is only two weeks. Although it's their player, this tournament has nothing to do with them, he'll not be able to play 9 games for Uruguay and more than 15 games for Liverpool.

Still, it's funny because it's Liverpool
Click to expand...

:lol::lol::lol: Spot on.

I remember being absolutely furious when Rooney and Scholes were banned from EPL games for getting sent off in a pre-season friendly, and this kind of has a similar feel to it in some ways. I'm kind of surprised at the decision, albeit very pleasantly surprised
 
I actually had a molecule of sympathy, for a moment, for Liverpool on this. They've done nothing wrong and are paying for his actions. Then i came to my senses and realised that this was Liverpool we're talking about.
 
There once was a young man name luiz.
His teeth got occasionally chewy.
He tried to eat men.
Time and again.
He preferred them to chicken chop suey.
 
Stookie said:
I actually had a molecule of sympathy, for a moment, for Liverpool on this. They've done nothing wrong and are paying for his actions. Then i came to my senses and realised that this was Liverpool we're talking about.
Click to expand...

I had a similar mental lapse.

It is important, in such trying times, that one reminds oneself of the club involved:

9624611.jpg
 
TooBias said:
I had a similar mental lapse.

It is important, in such trying times, that one reminds oneself of the club involved:

9624611.jpg
Click to expand...

This picture reminds me of those nature documentaries where the gorilla sees a camera and starts investigating it, smelling it and biting it.
 
Do Fifa have the power to actually operate on Suarez to remove his face? Or does that Violate his animal rights?
 
I bet Liverpool are annoyed that they're appealing this :lol:

I can see it being extended once the appeal is swiftly and rightfully denied.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.