No, this is genuinely what I want. Jeez, he just bit Chiellini, big woop, it's not like he really hurt him.
Whilst it's possibly still a case of 'red mist', biting is arguably more calculated than a leg breaking challenge. Football can be a rough game but clumsy/violent tackles will always be part of it. Biting is not part of attempting to get the ball. It's savage.
No, no and no.I'm sorry, but it would ruin the quality of this World Cup if you banned one of its best players in the knockout stages. It is disgusting what he did, but I think it's fair to review the challenge after the World Cup and to give viewers an entertaining fixture with Suarez on the field. They should release a statement saying they can't ban a player before the end of the tournament.
Dear oh dear oh dear!No, this is genuinely what I want. Jeez, he just bit Chiellini, big woop, it's not like he really hurt him.
I'm sorry, but it would ruin the quality of this World Cup if you banned one of its best players in the knockout stages. It is disgusting what he did, but I think it's fair to review the challenge after the World Cup and to give viewers an entertaining fixture with Suarez on the field. They should release a statement saying they can't ban a player before the end of the tournament.
Please tell me you're on the wind up.
You know what, forget it. No, I'm definitely not a Liverpool fan, I just recognise the value of entertainment and controversy in the World Cup finals. Yes, I do believe in the beautiful game of football. I'm not even Irish, but I felt betrayed when Henry handled the ball to win France WC qualification four years ago. Suarez's incident isn't really like that. But fine, I guess there is no argument for it.
I'm sorry, but it would ruin the quality of this World Cup if you banned one of its best players in the knockout stages. It is disgusting what he did, but I think it's fair to review the challenge after the World Cup and to give viewers an entertaining fixture with Suarez on the field. They should release a statement saying they can't ban a player before the end of the tournament.
RAWK can be bizarre at times like this, and some of their posts are disturbing. I suppose this place can be like that too, at times. It seems whenever a Liverpool player crosses the line, they're quick to bring up Keane and Cantona.
Difference is, for me, that Keane tackle permanently tainted his legacy in my eyes. A vengeful act of violence, and any punishment was acceptable. I still think he got off very lightly, I thought he was going to get a permanent ban at the time, and I wouldn't have argued against that (then or now).
Cantona's incident, I was somewhat more understanding of. I can't get my head around how some people feel that by attending a football match they're somehow magically entitled to shout the most vile abuse on the planet at players. Behaviour and actions that would get you either locked up or knocked out in any other environment. That said, what Cantona did was wrong, and he deserved a lengthy ban.
In the past few years, Suarez has been found guilty of: Cheating in a World Cup elimination match with the handball incident, bringing the integrity of fair play into question, and eliminating a team who probably deserved to advance. He's bitten 3 players now. He's been found guilty of racially abusing of a player. And on top of this all his other cynical antics and diving, the same type of behavior I've gladly and severely criticised Young, Nani, Ronaldo and other United players for in the past.
I hope FIFA throw the book at Suarez. Like it or not, it seems every premier league weekend I catch a glimpse of a player cursing. But when it was Wayne Rooney cursing, he got a ban. Why? Because he's a huge player on the world stage, children look up to him, blah blah. I accept that. Well now the Premier League player of the year, Liverpool and Uruguay idol, one of the stars of the world cup, has lost his mind and gone and bit someone (again - after being punished twice in his career for it) during a world cup match. It's many things, but certainly not hypocrisy, to hope and expect the punishment is severe.
RAWK can be bizarre at times like this, and some of their posts are disturbing. I suppose this place can be like that too, at times. It seems whenever a Liverpool player crosses the line, they're quick to bring up Keane and Cantona.
Difference is, for me, that Keane tackle permanently tainted his legacy in my eyes. A vengeful act of violence, and any punishment was acceptable. I still think he got off very lightly, I thought he was going to get a permanent ban at the time, and I wouldn't have argued against that (then or now).
Cantona's incident, I was somewhat more understanding of. I can't get my head around how some people feel that by attending a football match they're somehow magically entitled to shout the most vile abuse on the planet at players. Behaviour and actions that would get you either locked up or knocked out in any other environment. That said, what Cantona did was wrong, and he deserved a lengthy ban.
In the past few years, Suarez has been found guilty of: Cheating in a World Cup elimination match with the handball incident, bringing the integrity of fair play into question, and eliminating a team who probably deserved to advance. He's bitten 3 players now. He's been found guilty of racially abusing of a player. And on top of this all his other cynical antics and diving, the same type of behavior I've gladly and severely criticised Young, Nani, Ronaldo and other United players for in the past.
I hope FIFA throw the book at Suarez. Like it or not, it seems every premier league weekend I catch a glimpse of a player cursing. But when it was Wayne Rooney cursing, he got a ban. Why? Because he's a huge player on the world stage, children look up to him, blah blah. I accept that. Well now the Premier League player of the year, Liverpool and Uruguay idol, one of the stars of the world cup, has lost his mind and gone and bit someone (again - after being punished twice in his career for it) during a world cup match. It's many things, but certainly not hypocrisy, to hope and expect the punishment is severe.
Luckily, Henry was a very entertaining player so no big deal.You know what, forget it. No, I'm definitely not a Liverpool fan, I just recognise the value of entertainment and controversy in the World Cup finals. Yes, I do believe in the beautiful game of football. I'm not even Irish, but I felt betrayed when Henry handled the ball to win France WC qualification four years ago. Suarez's incident isn't really like that. But fine, I guess there is no argument for it.
This
We acknowledge what Keane does as cnutish, and nobody here tells it isnt a cnutish things to do. Ditto with Cantona.
We forgive them, perhaps... but we never think that they do not do anything wrong
RAWK on the other hand, twisted and distort it and thinks that he has done nothing wrong.
No, this is genuinely what I want. Jeez, he just bit Chiellini, big woop, it's not like he really hurt him.
So if it was any other non-star player, you'd give them a ban. But because it's Suarez, you'd let him off the hook just because you find him entertaining? Thank god you're not president of FIFA. What kind of a messed up double standard is that? Treating Suarez like he's entitled to special treatment is exactly why he goes around thinking biting people is a sign of "passion" and "dedication" and not, oh I don't know, a sign of poor mental health?All I want is an entertaining second round fixture between Colombia and Uruguay. If you spend two hours of your life watching a football game in a WORLD CUP, you'd want a player like Suarez giving his team a chance. FIFA can use my excuse to allow him to play that game, that's all I'm suggesting.
That's just being greedy.Is there any way by which any FIFA ban could also cover domestic football as well as international?
FIFA should review the incident after the World Cup, because if they ban Suarez now it would ruin Uruguay's chances of progressing against Colombia.
Is there any way by which any FIFA ban could also cover domestic football as well as international?
FIFA should review the incident after the World Cup, because if they ban Suarez now it would ruin Uruguay's chances of progressing against Colombia.
Mike Lavelle: I don't condone Suarez's behaviour, but Chiellini's reaction (falling to the ground and thrashing his arms) was ridiculous.
You know what, forget it. No, I'm definitely not a Liverpool fan, I just recognise the value of entertainment and controversy in the World Cup finals. Yes, I do believe in the beautiful game of football. I'm not even Irish, but I felt betrayed when Henry handled the ball to win France WC qualification four years ago. Suarez's incident isn't really like that. But fine, I guess there is no argument for it.
All I want is an entertaining second round fixture between Colombia and Uruguay. If you spend two hours of your life watching a football game in a WORLD CUP, you'd want a player like Suarez giving his team a chance. FIFA can use my excuse to allow him to play that game, that's all I'm suggesting.
It wasn't completely a wind-up. Look at the goals Suarez scored against England last week! Cutting a player like that who can score goals like that (because he's an idiot) would taint upcoming fixtures and Uruguay's chances. But yes, he should get an extensive 15 game international and domestic ban hopefully.
You know what, forget it. No, I'm definitely not a Liverpool fan, I just recognise the value of entertainment and controversy in the World Cup finals. Yes, I do believe in the beautiful game of football. I'm not even Irish, but I felt betrayed when Henry handled the ball to win France WC qualification four years ago. Suarez's incident isn't really like that. But fine, I guess there is no argument for it.
No, this is genuinely what I want. Jeez, he just bit Chiellini, big woop, it's not like he really hurt him.
Accepting the wrath of fellow caftards, I would like to ask, other than for weirdness and dramatic effect, how is biting worse than say, a leg breaking challenge?
@Dunk The dirty feckers that are FIFA have only went and charged him, I believe a strongly worded letter is in order.
P.S Don't forget to tell them about your idea.
You can go in for a genuine challenge and accidentally break someones leg. Theres no way you can bite someone by accident.
What makes a biting incident worse for most people i think is that well its just fecking odd to bite another Human being once let alone 3 times now.
He should get a serious ban 6-12 months i reckon its the only thing that might send him the message that he cant keep biting people.