RAWK Goes Into Meltdown | 2013/14




The "Real" one is clearly a blur/content aware tool in photoshop. fecking hell, Liverpool fans are deluded.


Yeah, but expect this "real" one to be used for years to come as proof that the press are anti Suarez blah blah.
 
Their thread is locked sadly but this doesn't stop some fantastic delusions...

It's bullshit.

He got frustrated and leaned his head in tward him as they were running (could have gone for the attempted head-butt)

The Italian then threw an elbow (and a good one) at Suarez - Should also have gone.

Nothing given by the ref, so the Iti starts running around, pointing to his shoulder, which had NOTHING on it on the close up.

Bitter feckers.

It's being reported Suarez has bitten an Italian......is this true, is this him trying to engineer that move?

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT THEY TASTE LIKE PIZZA

It was just a nudge with his head, media frenzy and anti Suarez movement now in overdrive!!!!!!!!!!!!

The quote below, which i thought was quite level headed.....
he definitely bit him. luis is incredibly stupid, and deserves to be banned (although ban would only apply to internationals). disgusting behavior again. If we received a good offer for him, I would want to sell.

......Was met with this
You sir, are an idiot!

Gotta love em!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Top
They're still debating whether it was a bite or not...

It's not a bite you self-righteous, knicker-wetting fanny! Get it right, he just pushed his face in with his mouth open. Of course his (larger than normal) teeth made slight contact.

Let's not blow this out of proportion, people around the world would have died today.
 
Suarez did feck all wrong except challenge an Italian defender. Did he bite him? Did he feck, and there is nothing on camera, anywhere, anytime, to suggest otherwise.

Anyone who can show any bite, put it up, or shut the feck up. It does not exist other than in the realms of the RAWK fantasist. Or Adrian Chiles.


phdzcy.gif
 


That's pretty damning evidence right there.... it's an aggressive, non-football motion, not a play on the ball, but a distinct over-biting motion that is indistinguishable with any other. He's fecked in the head.

The shame of it all is he's a quality footballer, possibly the most dangerous finisher in the game. Too bad he belongs in a mental institution.
 
I don't think that he's changed at all, Liverpool have had things fairly rosey this season. If they start struggling again, I think Suarez will pull a few disgusting stunts again. I could be wrong though.

You Sir were right about Suarez, I stand corrected about him having changed his behaviour!
 
Was just looking through RAWK to see if there were any more hilarious posts when I stumbled upon this gem:

Tin Foil Hat said:
Reality: Coming together with both to blame, perhaps a hint of a headbutt from Luis (playing devils advocate) but ultimately, nothing.

Press/FA/UEFA/FIFA reality: Suarez severed his artery, laid a Glasgow kiss on him and went on a murderous rampage.

The Italians were looking to bait and provoke Uruguayan players all through and in fairness to them, there were some utterly appalling 'tackles' (I use the term loosely) going in there all game from both sides. I'm surprised that there was only one red card.

Unfortunately, this is gamesmanship at its worst, but, you have to say that the footballing authorities have invited players to shit in their bed and carry on like this as they are singly (and I'm talking World football governing bodies here - not just the FA) unable or unwilling to crack down on this sort of behaviour.

Players have no respect for referees (not surprising in many instances, but nevertheless, they are the 'authority' figures on the pitch and are right even when wrong) and therefore get away with literally murder. There is snide behaviour from all in the game, but it is not even attempted to be stamped out. Histrionics, simulation - out and out cheating - is rife in the game and on a stage like this it is concentrated even more. The Italians overreaction was really quite nauseating but this is to be expected I'm afraid as this is the modern day game.

I've watched it again and again and the problem is (and please don't take this as me being flippant, as its not) is look at Luis's skull shape - he does have protruding teeth and the angle his head hits, his mouth will come into contact with the shoulder as he was falling into him face first. None of this of course will be taken into account as it will be more fun for the press to hound and slaughter him on the premise that he has previous. Batten down the hatches boys, as the filthy hoardes of the common gutter cockroach press are going to be coming out in force.

Love the part in bold especially- I can really get a sense of the sincerity shown, would have been easy to give a biased perspective.
 



The "Real" one is clearly a blur/content aware tool in photoshop. fecking hell, Liverpool fans are deluded.


I'm not so sure that their wrong. No doubt he bit him, but those marks just looks wrong considering the angle he got bit from. I also think that it's unlikely that his bite connected well enough in order to leave such deep marks. Just try it on your arm and see, you have to bite down pretty hard and even then the marks don't stay very long. I could be wrong though, either way this should be severely punished.
 
I'm not so sure that their wrong. No doubt he bit him, but those marks just looks wrong considering the angle he got bit from. I also think that it's unlikely that his bite connected well enough in order to leave such deep marks. Just try it on your arm and see, you have to bite down pretty hard and even then the marks don't stay very long. I could be wrong though, either way this should be severely punished.

You're right the marks do look a bit weird and inappropriate for the angle he bit him from. But I think if you can go back through the match you can see the marks on him as he shows the referee.
 
Strange but this will probably benefit the dippers in the long run. I doubt anyone will want to buy him after this. It seemed like he'd changed but obviously not.
 
Strange but this will probably benefit the dippers in the long run. I doubt anyone will want to buy him after this. It seemed like he'd changed but obviously not.

Depends whether they want to choose short-term success of the next 2-3 seasons in regards to the seemingly goal return from Suarez of 20-30 goals per season over preserving the image of their club that someone in their PR department has clearly been trying desperately to repair after the racism and biting incidents with the 'family' and 'changed' man that is Suarez. The three times he's done this it has been when his team haven't been winning. If the dippers do keep hold of him, they'd better hope for another 10 game winning streak again next season fuelled by soft penalties or else he'll start all this bollocks again.
 
:lol: he does like to eat defenders alive. Literally and figuratively speaking.
 
I'm not so sure that their wrong. No doubt he bit him, but those marks just looks wrong considering the angle he got bit from. I also think that it's unlikely that his bite connected well enough in order to leave such deep marks. Just try it on your arm and see, you have to bite down pretty hard and even then the marks don't stay very long. I could be wrong though, either way this should be severely punished.
This is from ITV.

Same imprints, different picture.

IKal0IJ.jpg
 
I know a few fictional Liverpool fans and they all want him to be tied to the back of Rosberg's F1 car.
 
Suarez did feck all wrong except challenge an Italian defender. Did he bite him? Did he feck, and there is nothing on camera, anywhere, anytime, to suggest otherwise.

Anyone who can show any bite, put it up, or shut the feck up. It does not exist other than in the realms of the RAWK fantasist. Or Adrian Chiles.

phdzcy.gif

I believe that's Check and mate lol.
 
So... they photoshopped live tv, where millions of people everywhere are watching, and to top it off, chiellini ask his missus to bite him all over to prepare to get Suarez carded, he probably even had a high tech teeth magnet or probably some ancient pheromone to lure suarez into leaning over.
 
I don't know how deluded they are, if they're that deluded, i fear that maybe thatcher poison them or induce a mind control mechanism

The most disgusting part for me is not Suarez (i take him as mentally ill), but the collective hive down the RAWK that can come up with shits like in this thread distorts reality and a simple fact that their beloved player simply is crazy and bit someone.

And as a United fans, I love this. RAWK will be a comedy gold for the next few years for this alone
 
Rawk is a special bunch.
All Liverpool fans i know despise his behaviour, but very few are sure of what to make of it from Liverpool's point of view. My closest Liverpool-supporting friend says they should get rid of him because it's damaging to the clubs reputation to stand by him through all his antics.
 
lets get this in perspective , Biting is not great but lets look at it seriously, on the BBC Panel one lad stamped on another players head, one was a cynical guy on the pitch with many red cards in his locker, one shat himself on the pitch, and the other was Danny Murphy.

Or lets compare it the amount of players Chellini has kicked out of games in his career, or a legend at this club who assaulted a player on the pitch in a european cup game, or Roy Keane's tackle.

Luis is thick because pricks like Linekar and his xenophobic mates will be lapping this up after he dumped England out, and then again who is going to judge him at Fifa a panel of dodgy corrupt and alleged bribe taking committee members . The whole game and FIFA are corrupt.

What Luis did was stupid but compared to everything else wrong in football its a minor problem blown out of all proportion by the useless UK hacks.

They have started.


They're really the best fans in the world if they can still trying to defend him from all this vehemently
 
It happens. Some of our guys were just as bad when Cantona kicked that fan.

I wasn't around back then.

But I think, none of us every say that it wasn't a kick, or a slip, or anything absurd. Cantona kicked the fans, we say it's wrong, we say that fan deserved it, cantona deserves his ban. End off

I don't think any of us are that deluded to think that Cantona didn't kick him and it was all cgi
 
It happens. Some of our guys were just as bad when Cantona kicked that fan.
There is a huge difference between the two. What Cantona did was wrong. It was a (unjustified) reaction to provocation. In Suarez's case (all 3 times) it has been unprovoked.
 
One of the threads there is titled "Not being allowed to talk about major footballing incident in football forums."

Naturally, it's locked. :lol:
 
There is a huge difference between the two. What Cantona did was wrong. It was a (unjustified) reaction to provocation. In Suarez's case (all 3 times) it has been unprovoked.

And United fans don't claim that there was a banana peel on the ground and he slipped sending one of his legs flying and just happened to land on an opposing fan.
 
What I meant was, the fans supported him and some dismissed what he had done.

Nobody would blame the scouse (and RAWK for this thread) if they defend him, but the way they defend him by distorting reality and bringing all sorts of things into debate.

They should have known better how it feels when people distorts a simple blatant fact to defend something, but they just shrug it off like it's a none issue altogether.

I'm not sure which one i'm worried more, a looney footballer, or a looney society as a whole