RAWK Goes Into Meltdown (2011/2012)

The problem with RAWK is that they are not only deluded, and at times racist, but that they are almost trained to have illogical thought processes.

Obviously the RAWK meltdown thread having 2 million views reflects how exceptionally awful and comical their season was. Back in the 80s there wouldn't be melting down to report. Rushyman is like a less interesting but equally retarded A@A.

They have been a gold mine this season. Suarez acting like a prized fighting cnut every time he takes the field.

The racism thing. The league position. The 35m price tag on Carroll. Adam lasting 3/4 of a season and largely cementing the average into their season.

Henderson gash, Dalglish losing it, Pepe head butting people. It's been a vintage year.. one to remember :lol:


New incident, same old excuses.

Had a mate on Facebook trying to make nothing of it... fecking wow. Delusion at it's finest..
 
They have been a gold mine this season. Suarez acting like a prized fighting cnut every time he takes the field.

The racism thing. The league position. The 35m price tag on Carroll. Adam lasting 3/4 of a season and largely cementing the average into their season.

Henderson gash, Dalglish losing it, Pepe head butting people. It's been a vintage year.. one to remember :lol:

It has been a horrible season as a neutral tbh.
Watching City win the league & all the above non-sense plus Terry racism/captaincy shenanighans are quite annoying; and i hope next season has none of it.
 
It has been a horrible season as a neutral tbh.
Watching City win the league & all the above non-sense plus Terry racism/captaincy shenanighans are quite annoying; and i hope next season has none of it.

As I have probably said in this thread before.
There are just so many Liverpool fans I know who are ecstatic that City are possibly going to win the title. It baffles me, it really does.
 
I'm not sure why it baffles you. We have 19 titles, Liverpool have 18. They aren't going to win the league for a long, long time so every time we do, it hurts them that bit more.

The alternative to us winning it this season is cITY, so it's obvious to anyone that they would prefer them to win it. They lover their numbers and are proud of how many trophies they have won. cITY will equal Huddersfield's record. Do the maths.
 
As I have probably said in this thread before.
There are just so many Liverpool fans I know who are ecstatic that City are possibly going to win the title. It baffles me, it really does.

Yeah, it's really not baffling at all. If it was between Chelsea and Liverpool for the title, who would you prefer to win?
 
I'm not sure why it baffles you. We have 19 titles, Liverpool have 18. They aren't going to win the league for a long, long time so every time we do, it hurts them that bit more.

The alternative to us winning it this season is cITY, so it's obvious to anyone that they would prefer them to win it. They lover their numbers and are proud of how many trophies they have won. cITY will equal Huddersfield's record. Do the maths.

They have basically bought their way into the top four and so far (hindsight is great) it has been Liverpool that has fallen furthest. They should detest them.

It represents all that Liverpool football club aren't. (Just like United in a way)

Aright it has been a lot of cock up on their clubs part but the fans trying to vicariously bask in their glory.. it's embarrassing. It could easily have been their club who lucked into the oil money.
 
They have basically bought their way into the top four and so far (hindsight is great) it has been Liverpool that has fallen furthest. They should detest them.

It represents all that Liverpool football club aren't. (Just like United in a way)

Aright it has been a lot of cock up on their clubs part but the fans trying to vicariously bask in their glory.. it's embarrassing. It could easily have been their club who lucked into the oil money.

Indeed they've made it virtually impossible for Liverpool to get back to top 4 and they have to remember they've made CL in each of the seasons before sheikhs had invested their money into City. Last season if you'd taken City away from equation, Liverpool would have been 5th but remember they lost 2-0 to Spurs at home late on - had they won that game and with 4th at stake they would have definitely put more effort, they would have finished 4th in the imaginary world where City are where they belong i.e. bottom 10.
 
They have been a gold mine this season. Suarez acting like a prized fighting cnut every time he takes the field.

The racism thing. The league position. The 35m price tag on Carroll. Adam lasting 3/4 of a season and largely cementing the average into their season.

Henderson gash, Dalglish losing it, Pepe head butting people. It's been a vintage year.. one to remember :lol:

And to think, we though KRAP and the 'internet terrorism' movement could never be beaten .... yes, I'll also admit it, I also underestimated RAWK. :lol:

Lesson learnt: :nono: :nono: Never EVER underestimate RAWK to reign omnipotent at the Comedy Gold Awards TM.
 
They have basically bought their way into the top four and so far (hindsight is great) it has been Liverpool that has fallen furthest. They should detest them.

It represents all that Liverpool football club aren't. (Just like United in a way)

Aright it has been a lot of cock up on their clubs part but the fans trying to vicariously bask in their glory.. it's embarrassing. It could easily have been their club who lucked into the oil money.

I agree. I've said all this before to the Arsenal and Liverpool fans here, especially the Liverpool fans. They don't seem to understand that City are hurting them just as much with all their spending billions.

Only a few seasons ago, Liverpool were finishing in the top four and playing CL football. A lot of them do probably detest how City have gotten to where they were, but when it comes to United, all sense goes out the window I'm afraid.
 
I agree. I've said all this before to the Arsenal and Liverpool fans here, especially the Liverpool fans. They don't seem to understand that City are hurting them just as much with all their spending billions.

Only a few seasons ago, Liverpool were finishing in the top four and playing CL football. A lot of them do probably detest how City have gotten to where they were, but when it comes to United, all sense goes out the window I'm afraid.

This logic doesn't really make sense.

City are clearly there to stay, them (Liverpool) becoming a top side again doesn't or won't change this. So if they're there to stay, who do you think they're going to go for at this stage of the season?
 
This logic doesn't really make sense.

City are clearly there to stay, them (Liverpool) becoming a top side again doesn't or won't change this. So if they're there to stay, who do you think they're going to go for at this stage of the season?


City are over-powering everybody with their spending, and getting to the top by spending billions. A few seasons ago, Spurs got into the top four on merit, then City went and spent more money and got their way into the top four instead.

Liverpool haven't won the league in 22 years. It wasn't so long ago they looked like they could do it. But they certainly won't be winning it anytime soon now. Arsenal haven't won it in 8 years, they won't be winning it anytime soon.
 
City are over-powering everybody with their spending, and getting to the top by spending billions. A few seasons ago, Spurs got into the top four on merit, then City went and spent more money and got their way into the top four instead.

Liverpool haven't won the league in 22 years. It wasn't so long ago they looked like they could do it. But they certainly won't be winning it anytime soon now. Arsenal haven't won it in 8 years, they won't be winning it anytime soon.

7.
And don't write us off completely.
 
City are over-powering everybody with their spending, and getting to the top by spending billions. A few seasons ago, Spurs got into the top four on merit, then City went and spent more money and got their way into the top four instead.

Liverpool haven't won the league in 22 years. It wasn't so long ago they looked like they could do it. But they certainly won't be winning it anytime soon now. Arsenal haven't won it in 8 years, they won't be winning it anytime soon.

Your logic still doesn't make sense. Whether we want our sides to win the League or not, and whether they can or not is irrelevant. City are there to stay. Liverpool being a top side again won't change that fact. They're there to stay, whether it's at Liverpool's expense or not.

Once again, who do you think the Liverpool fans would be rooting for at this stage of the season?
 
Absolutely this!

City could hire the FSW, shit on a statue of Paisley/Shankley...but if they had to choose between us and City...it'd always be City.

Proper, proper, ABU mentality.

Doesn't that cut both ways though ?

There's not many United fans over the decades that have cheered Liverpool's successes. We're the 2 most successful clubs in English football, aswell as being Northern neighbours. It's called rivalry.
 
Put it this way, liverpool or city to win EPL.

You got your own answer

c8e7rt5


I honestly can't answer that.

Having said that, hypothetically lets just say it was in reverse and it was Everton that got bought out and we were Liverpool and would it be between Liverpool and Everton I don't know if I could hypothetically choose Liverpool.

I'd have to confer with the guy who made up an argument in his head and still lost and told everyone about it. :lol:
 
Your logic still doesn't make sense. Whether we want our sides to win the League or not, and whether they can or not is irrelevant. City are there to stay. Liverpool being a top side again won't change that fact. They're there to stay, whether it's at Liverpool's expense or not.

Once again, who do you think the Liverpool fans would be rooting for at this stage of the season?

I'm not at all sure that City's owners will continue to fund this cash bonfire. Not because they care about the money, just because it's a toy to them and who knows when a billionaire royal will get tired of something and discard it.

They'll probably try to keep it and turn it into a profitable business, but I don't feel it's at all certain. I'm not saying I think they will abandon City in the short term, just that when you're relying on the whim of a single person you don't have much stability and it shouldn't be taken for granted.
 
I'm not at all sure that City's owners will continue to fund this cash bonfire. Not because they care about the money, just because it's a toy to them and who knows when a billionaire royal will get tired of something and discard it.

They'll probably try to keep it and turn it into a profitable business, but I don't feel it's at all certain. I'm not saying I think they will abandon City in the short term, just that when you're relying on the whim of a single person you don't have much stability and it shouldn't be taken for granted.

Been saying that about the Chavs for years & it hasn't happened yet.
 
Been saying that about the Chavs for years & it hasn't happened yet.

Roman still hasn't achieved his ultimate aim of winning the CL, who knows where his interest will hold if they ever achieve that. In any case, he's certainly not as willing to throw money at Chelsea since his initial sprees with Ranieri and Mourinho, Torres excluded ofcourse.
 
:lol:

They are all wanking over their new kit. It looks like they got a penguin tee and put a few yellow iron on transfers on it.

It looks shite! Hahahah.
(I know ours looks shithouse as well :lol:)

Get in, new shirts look boss.

:lol:
 
''Na he's average, most of the time he has to do feck all because they are playing dross who are scared shitless to attack and on the rare occasion that a lower team has the balls to go at United Vidic will cheat and foul his way through the period of pressure normally with the help of the ref. When United play the big teams who have both the balls and the ability to attack United Vidic is shown up for the average defender that he is and he also gets himself sent off in the big games.

Average defender benefiting from playing against bollockless teams most of the time.''

old one, wow.
 
''Na he's average, most of the time he has to do feck all because they are playing dross who are scared shitless to attack and on the rare occasion that a lower team has the balls to go at United Vidic will cheat and foul his way through the period of pressure normally with the help of the ref. When United play the big teams who have both the balls and the ability to attack United Vidic is shown up for the average defender that he is and he also gets himself sent off in the big games.

Average defender benefiting from playing against bollockless teams most of the time.''

old one, wow.

Indeed. That's why he has a Champions League medal.
 
It's invalid really as Rafa could have turned him into a better player or a worse player than what his average self is now, not to mention different factors and set ups and the fact weaker teams love to attack us which would show up Vidic being the average player that he is. Most games Vidic has to do feck all due to teams being utter shithouses which contributes to people's thinking that he is a good defender, in my opinion.

Based on his current level I'd say no Skrtel and Agger are brilliant especially as a partnership and dont forget teams love attacking us! Skrtel went through a stage in 09/10 where he looked very average but so did everyone, it looks like he has got back to his best that he was at in 2008. Also at the time in question we still had Carragher and Hyypia who both at the time were better than Vidic ever has been or ever will be.

it just gets better and better.
 
If it was Liverpool, they'd be claiming that those decisions mean they're the obviously better team and are the somehow the more deserving champions, like they did in 2008-9.

We'll give credit where it's due and accept City beat us to the title.
 
Lol, remember that season they came second. It was 'touch Alonso and you see red.. kgo'.. How many reds was it that season? 12 or 13 or something?

Hahaha:lol: