Neo_Mufc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2009
- Messages
- 10,161
Too much
Best post of thread so far.
please tell me thats for real..please
You're not gonna believe this one...
That second one was a bit disturbing Steve.
Ask not what Kenny can do for your club but what you can do for Kenny.
What the feck can they do for Kenny?
That place actually scares me, it really is close to a cult, they have an idol, an impossible dream and the worse case of group think known to man. The mods actually seem to think it's their responsibility to enforce an ideal and control the fans
What the feck can they do for Kenny?
Basically it's funny for United fans to laugh at Liverpool doing poorly, and I would argue Kenny hasn't done much better than Hodgson, but paying millions to sack him and get someone else in won't do anything. It's best to give him more time.
Do you miss the vomit-inducing, sickly-sweet love-fest that RAWK used to have with a certain FSW?
Badunk said:Do you yearn for poetry, rose-tinted musings and tales of grown men weeping?
Badunk said:THEN MISS THEM NO MORE!!!
Saul Goodman said:It's funny I can't think of another manager who has done more for a club. The battles he fought internally, the good he did in the City, the players he brought to this club, the success he had on the pitch and the youth system which he completely overhauled. Amazing...
[my bolding]SMD said:Kenny.
And that's not to belittle what Rafa did. The fact that the only man alive we could say has done more is our manager right now speaks volumes.
COME on QPR.. How we have fallen, we now have to rely on QPR to beat Newcastle to stay in top 6
Do any other teams' forums find them as amusing as us?
A few, and the caf is often viewed as the United equivalent.
He faced them alone in the bleak winter dawn. 'Then Hicks hewed him with his black axe, and a white flame sprang up from the helm of Rafa as it was cloven. And they beat him into the dust with their maces; and his banner, red and white, they trod into the mire of his blood.'What exactly did Benitez do to 'fight the previous owners'?
He faced them alone in the bleak winter dawn. 'Then Hicks hewed him with his black axe, and a white flame sprang up from the helm of Rafa as it was cloven. And they beat him into the dust with their maces; and his banner, red and white, they trod into the mire of his blood.'
Thus fell the High King of the RAWKites.
Other tales tell of how he spoke out against the owners' transfer expenditure, or rather 'lack of-', went public with his misgivings regarding the Hicks/Gillett LBO, and finally walked off into the wild blue yonder with a hefty severence package.
I think it's fair to say he certainly did his part in helping Liverpool out of the Hicks/Gillett swamp, so credit to him. His most avid fanboys are really doing his legacy a disservice through their overwrought nonsense, making him just a figure of fun.
By the end of it I was sobbing. fecking hell, I miss the beautiful man.
More or less, but his public criticism of the owners made their position untenable, thus hastening their departure.
I seeee....so, it was typical Rafaness: 'fighting the evil owners'='Gimme more money to blow on rubbish players.' What a hero.
A good example of how blinkered the journalists are on this, was an article by Matthew Syed in the Times this week.
Under the heading of "What do I think? No idea, I just follow Kenny", he is basically calling Liverpool fans lemmings, blindly following whatever the club / Kenny say, without any independent thought.
One extract, "Grown men in the Greater Merseyside area spent hours, weeks, becoming expert in ..........., the linguistic nuances of Spanish as spoken in Uruguay, and sacrificed precious evenings to pore over a 115-page report to find something, anything that might bolster a conclusion they had already prejudged. Had Dalglish told them the sky was purple with yellow dots .........", etc, etc. You get the gist.
Why did he just narrow it down to "grown men" and "Greater Merseyside"? Perhaps the truth of it being men & women of all ages across the globe, wouldn't have served his agenda too well. If he then added " ...... including fans suitably qualified in the legal profession", then his "lemmings" argument suddenly starts to lack a certain credibility. But hey, why write the truth when it would spoil a good story.
I find the section about fans reading the report & studying the "linguistic nuances" particularly amusing - perhaps all the journalists should have done this before writing their bile. As for the section "anything that might bolster a conclusion they had already prejudged", - isn't that what the FA & journalists did themselves?
Unfortunately we live in a world where most journalists are agenda-driven, and the days of good investigative reporting, where there is a drive to get at the truth, have long gone
I forwarded a copy of the OP to Patrick Collins from the Mail on Sunday accusing him of taking an anti LFC pro MUFC stance in his recent articles about Suarez . I asked him to read the piece which I hoped would change his mind. Some hope.
This is his reply
Thank you for your message. I did actually read it all the way through, becoming more depressed with every line.
I shan’t go through all the issues raised by the Suarez case, since the FA commission did that with remarkable diligence and intellectual rigour. Having read the report three times, it amazes me that even the most one – eyed Liverpool supporter could quarrel with its conclusions.
What really depresses me are the trite assumptions made by those who seek to defend the indefensible. Why do you assume that I am “pro – Manchester United’? Absolute nonsense. And why assume that I am anti – Liverpool, when I have had decades of association with the club, going back to Bill Shankly. As a young reporter I used to write a weekly column with Bill and would meet him for a cup of tea and a football education whenever Liverpool were in London. The idea that I could be prejudiced against such a club is actually offensive.
As I say, I don’t want to make all the obvious points. I think the club has let itself down badly over the past few weeks. I think the arrogant and ill – founded support of Suarez has reflected badly on the club and its manager. I think that your condemnation of the FA’s part in the process is simply ridiculous, as is your confident assertion that Suarez would succeed in an action for defamation. You really haven’t a legal clue, have you?
Why do you, and so many of your fellow fans, believe that the rest of the country is anti – Liverpool? Why should those of us who live in London, say, feel any inclination to favour United, or anyone else, above Liverpool? Why do you so avidly seek the role of victim? And why do you prattle about “rent – a – quote anti – racism activists’, when you refer to people who appear more measured, more civilised than you? It’s really quite worrying for the rest of us.
Anyway, I have wasted too much time on this frivolous matter. I am pleased that justice has been done and I hope that the club and its manager will slowly start to see sense.
Best of luck with the Dalglish Day, by the way. Perhaps you might have a T – shirt printed?
Yours,
Patrick Collins.