Jeppers7
Pogfamily Mafia
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 7,435
Some miserable cnuts in here
Take it easy.And if the add ons are achieved, which could very well be very easy, we’ll pay 73m…
So they spent all that time negotiating 4m down from a comically overpriced initial fee.
But then we already know the club is run by absolute feckwits who don’t demand excellence at every level.
How many on that list have actually been worth the fee?
most of those complete flops. Jury still out on Enzo, Vlahovic, Tchouameni
How many of these players proved to be wise investments? There is no way the fee can be justified for a 9 league goals player
Not the point I was trying to make but I do agree with you all that majority of them are flops/jury still out on.
But those kinds transfers set a precedent unfortunately.
Very difficult to sign the finished article for <30m like the good old days. "Potential" seems to cost a minimum of 50m now. Weird considering nobody knows if a player is gonna turn world class or not. I don't agree with it but that's the way the cookie crumbles.
I'm delighted with the transfer, couldn't care less about fee and I hope he does great for us.
Sounds like an obvious briefing. Pedulla reported what they wanted, and they got itAccording to Jamie Jackson, Atalanta wanted an initial £77M fee.
We spent €282 last season and this
Mount €64
Onana €52
Hojlund €70
Thats €468 or £401
YesHe's nailed you.
'Harem of snivelpots'“Mewling quims” has me giggling excellent post
We play athletic Bilbao in Dublin on the Sunday. Surely the stronger team will play in that game?Fair do’s, RC Lens at OT it is!
To make it make more sense, their reported bid of 50m euros is roughly more in line with his value. Cool.Ah okay so you just make stuff up and pass it off as facts? Same as the tabloid newspapers then. No one really knows what PSG were prepared to pay. We do know that Højlund wanted to play for us thereby making their bid whatever it was, almost meaningless.
Hard to believe some on here understand the concept of a discussion forum.Hard to believe some of you actually support United.
All players are immediately divisive on the Caf, because the Caf always has that vocal element that are ready to have a moan about literally anything. There isn’t a single transfer in the last decade that didn’t come with a fair share of doomsayers. The list of what people get wound up about and the red flags they find is as interminable as it is often contradictory. And of course when someone complains about everything, they are going to sometimes be right; which just reinforces the self aggrandising rhetoric and deepens the nihilistic malaise.
The amount of premature ejaculation that will occur on here this season after a missed Hojlund chance or a poor Mount performance, is going to be almost as revolting as the inevitable “I told you so”s. Never mind the deafening silence after a good performance, because the resident quim burgers always have another target to move on to.
Let us never forget that this is the place that gave us the now infamous “Rashford, new contract or sell” thread, in which an unhealthy amount of posters insisted we should release him on a free due to his overwhelming and incurable shiteness. Those of us who pointed out the utter madness of this suggestion were mocked and vilified for extolling values such as patience and reason, because as Mark Twain said; “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience.”
So no, the divisiveness of a signing is not indicative of anything to do with the quality of a signing. It’s just a by product of the enormous amounts of mouth frothing, knee jerking, miserable stupidity regularly on display here. I genuinely believe that there is a sizeable portion of this forum that actually want to see Hojlund fail so they think they can look good by predicting we overpaid. Of course they won’t look good, ever. Not now in moaning about the fee, or later doing their tribalistic “I knew better” song and dance. In both instances they will look like the embittered, toxic, hate-fans that they really are.
Sad thing is, if old Rasmus doesn’t hit the ground running, then half of them will be turning against himSome miserable cnuts in here
Hi there!Hard to believe some on here understand the concept of a discussion forum.
Tchouaméni wasnt a bench player for the future he was a direct replacement for Casemiro, and if anything isnt a very good example to bring up, because 80m was a good deal for him as all the top teams wanted him. Madrid fans know they are getting Mbappé and have just signed Bellingham. so, they arent a good example to bring up about fans that don't complain either, they are spoiled as feck.Some of the amateur fecking accountants in here, feck me. Some people just have to have a moan about anything and everything. You don’t see Madrid fans whining why they spent x on a player they really wanted. They just celebrate getting them. Which is what we should be doing here. Why the obsession over the fee? The same should be expected of him whether we paid 55m or 75m.
The bottom line is that he was the managers top choice for a CF, and we’ve gotten the deal done at a price we could afford, and early in the window. In a position we DESPERATELY needed to strengthen. I don’t understand what’s not to like here.
Madrid dropped 80m on a bench player for the future last summer, as they forward plan, and their fans took it with typical big dick energy. Meanwhile we’ve got a gaggle of mewling quims, who get a better chubby from winning the bookkeeping DoF olympics, than actually building a good squad. The same harem of snivlepots who are still whining about how much Antony cost, or think jokes about “preparing a bid, or monitoring developments” are still funny.
This place is honestly such a depressing buzzkill most of the time. Shoot me for coming in excited we’ve signed a top talent, for a position we were desperately lacking in. I should’ve known I’d be walking into a nerdy, uninformed, nihilistic circle jerk.
Football transfers aren't exciting to me. The actual football is.All due respect but this is everything that makes the cafe such a downer these days. People forming concrete opinions on players before we've even seen them sign a contract with the club, let alone actually play. It affects anybodys ability to view something impartially.
I think we've got a very talented manager here who knows exactly what type of squad he's trying to build, and is backed up by people that seem capable of improving a lot of our players. They seem to believe that Hojlund is worth the investment so us 'laymen' should take some confidence from that.
We had a very promising first season under Ten Hag, and the squad already looks better than it was. Get excited. Why not?
Top reddism is over 9000.Some of the amateur fecking accountants in here, feck me. Some people just have to have a moan about anything and everything. You don’t see Madrid fans whining why they spent x on a player they really wanted. They just celebrate getting them. Which is what we should be doing here. Why the obsession over the fee? The same should be expected of him whether we paid 55m or 75m.
The bottom line is that he was the managers top choice for a CF, and we’ve gotten the deal done at a price we could afford, and early in the window. In a position we DESPERATELY needed to strengthen. I don’t understand what’s not to like here.
Madrid dropped 80m on a bench player for the future last summer, as they forward plan, and their fans took it with typical big dick energy. Meanwhile we’ve got a gaggle of mewling quims, who get a better chubby from winning the bookkeeping DoF olympics, than actually building a good squad. The same harem of snivlepots who are still whining about how much Antony cost, or think jokes about “preparing a bid, or monitoring developments” are still funny.
This place is honestly such a depressing buzzkill most of the time. Shoot me for coming in excited we’ve signed a top talent, for a position we were desperately lacking in. I should’ve known I’d be walking into a nerdy, uninformed, nihilistic circle jerk.
It is actually £60m plus add onsYeah so it is £64m + add ons OR £72m including add ons.
You incorrectly ‘corrected’ a poster who said it was £64m plus add ons so you can’t have meant 72m combined.
Why haven't we considered Ivan Toney ?
Proven Premier League ability.
Big and strong which apparently is whT ETH wants.
I know he's suspended, but that must surely reduce his price and Brentford could probably do with the money.
Not seen anyone conclusively say Spurs wouldn't sell to us. Just that they're reluctant to do so. However I have seen that the rumoured price is 100m sterling. Which for him is fair considering without the year left on his deal he'd be going for at least 140.Daniel Levy
We don’t do business with them because of him
Why are people bothered about what we paid for him?
Not seen anyone conclusively say Spurs wouldn't sell to us. Just that they're reluctant to do so. However I have seen that the rumoured price is 100m sterling. Which for him is fair considering without the year left on his deal he'd be going for at least 140.
Why haven't we considered Ivan Toney ?
Proven Premier League ability.
Big and strong which apparently is whT ETH wants.
I know he's suspended, but that must surely reduce his price and Brentford could probably do with the money.
Probably because it affects FFP and thus has ramifications for future transfer windows, and it also directly affects whether or not other players can be signed, and if so, what players can be signed.
That would be my guess.
Honestly I’m just so glad we don’t have to watch Wout anymore that the fee means nothing right now.
It does seem to add more unnecessary pressure to these players when they do not immediately hit the ground running, and that’s not including how poorly we have spent in the past with these young unproven players.Why are people bothered about what we paid for him?
Not to mention that it’s a vicious cycle where the next £30m player we try and sign is also priced at £80m, before we get a “good deal” at £60m.
It's amazing how this question still pops up when this was the reason we didn't sign a player who almost helped the scousers to top 4 lat year and is set to feature heavily this season again.Probably because it affects FFP and thus has ramifications for future transfer windows, and it also directly affects whether or not other players can be signed, and if so, what players can be signed.
That would be my guess.
If they are reporting then the fee is £64m add ons are rarely hit with united nowadays , I think he’ll be worth that in a few years but he’ll struggle first season?I hope you are right but I don’t think so many reputable journos are getting it wrong. Simon stone, Orny, Di marzio are all saying the same thing. £64m + £8m
Tchouaméni wasnt a bench player for the future he was a direct replacement for Casemiro, and if anything isnt a very good example to bring up, because 80m was a good deal for him as all the top teams wanted him. Madrid fans know they are getting Mbappé and have just signed Bellingham. so, they arent a good example to bring up about fans that don't complain either, they are spoiled as feck.
Toney was one of my top choices. Alas, ‘twas not to be.
Hopefully Højlund turns out to be a better player than him though.