Predictably, he's a long term project player - a decent bench option if the world class player you have is injured. And yet ETH overpaid for him anyway. Another data point about managerial ineptness.
2 years too early.
Pick up someone from the streets and he will fight for the shirt. Its not something to appreciate.
But that’s pretty crazy, even the top end of strikers miss multiple chances a game before scoring, the likes of Haaland and Kane I believe had about 30 odd % chance conversion rate last season, they have a team supplying them with ridiculous amount of chances.Working his bollocks off with zero supply. That said so did Weghorst.
He's got to start scoring the half chances he gets otherwise he's just going to keep heaping pressure on himself.
I think this is true. I highly doubt he would score as many as Haaland but I bet he would have five or six by now if he was playing those players.But that’s pretty crazy, even the top end of strikers miss multiple chances a game before scoring, the likes of Haaland and Kane I believe had about 30 odd % chance conversion rate last season, they have a team supplying them with ridiculous amount of chances.
But for some reason according to our fanbase a young, inexperienced, albeit talented kid in Hojlund is meant to be bagging half chances from a team that barely gives him anything to work with otherwise he’s a flop. It’s ridiculous
If he was playing for City in Haalands’ stead he’d be bagging goals.
He should have fallen down..Terrible performance. Gave away stupid penalty then wasted a through on goal with a poor touch.
Played decent until the penalty but it went pretty bad from there. Can't understand the anger when he gets taken off, it's not as if he's a prolific goalscorer that's making a huge, positive difference to the team. He's a kid with a great work ethic who is still learning.
He is only hyped up on here because we paid 70m for him.I don't think he is all that. A bit overhyped I think. You can all have a go at me but that's how I feel.
I don't think he is all that. A bit overhyped I think. You can all have a go at me but that's how I feel.
Have you seen us play? We are dysfunctional team with no pattern whatsoever. We are sitting with -5 GD, so its not like everyone else around him is scoring goals. We are absolutely awful at the momentI don't get all praise that he gets. I don't care how much he tries and how much he runs.
8 games in PL. Zero goals, zero assists.
Because Hojlund's goal record shows another story?Well that says a lot considering he is our best attacker and it's not even close.
ETH needs to get the hint a sub off the other feckers.
Well it wouldn't have a been a penalty because it was outside the box, but a free lick in a decent position yepHe should have fallen down..
And let VAR decide
Pick up someone from the streets and he will fight for the shirt. Its not something to appreciate.
Because Hojlund's goal record shows another story?
It is not about him. Exactly as you said; he plays as expected. It is about Murtough/ETH. Hojlund was and is wrong signing. We needed first choice striker and we bought "young and learning" one.He looks and plays exactly how you’d expect a 20 year old playing his first season of PL football for a side who struggle to consistently create chances to, really. I don’t see the need in getting overly aggressive either to defend or slate him
Hojlund was the wrong signing only if you were deluded enough to believe we would actually achieve anything this season. Given that we are garbage throughout the squad, then signing a young guy who can develop into a top player where we have him for 5+ years is exactly the right decision. It buys us time. Spending big on a player like Kane, only for us to still be shit, very quickly descends into a disastrous piece of transfer business where you lost 100m and your team is still disaster FC. And I guarantee you, the way this season has gone would NOT have changed with a more experienced CF in. The problems go far above the squad and this Kane hypothetical would change feck all with us.It is not about him. Exactly as you said; he plays as expected. It is about Murtough/ETH. Hojlund was and is wrong signing. We needed first choice striker and we bought "young and learning" one.
And ot is not good for him too. He became a part of the team in which he needs to be key player. And he is not ready for that.
We are Man Utd. We can't build a team for the future in expense of current season. We always must look short term and long term at the same time. Spending premium money on him was insane stuff to do while not having decent striker.Hojlund was the wrong signing only if you were deluded enough to believe we would actually achieve anything this season. Given that we are garbage throughout the squad, then signing a young guy who can develop into a top player where we have him for 5+ years is exactly the right decision. It buys us time. Spending big on a player like Kane, only for us to still be shit, very quickly descends into a disastrous piece of transfer business where you lost 100m and your team is still disaster FC. And I guarantee you, the way this season has gone would NOT have changed with a more experienced CF in. The problems go far above the squad and this Kane hypothetical would change feck all with us.
Well it wouldn't have a been a penalty because it was outside the box, but a free lick in a decent position yep
It is not about him. Exactly as you said; he plays as expected. It is about Murtough/ETH. Hojlund was and is wrong signing. We needed first choice striker and we bought "young and learning" one.
And ot is not good for him too. He became a part of the team in which he needs to be key player. And he is not ready for that.