Based on what?Comparing a 26 year old to a 20 year old… of course Jesus is currently better but Hojlund will become better.
Based on my opinionBased on what?
Okay. Fair enoughBased on my opinion
Based on what?
Exactly. He can’t even get on his national team ahead of Richarlison! By the way, Hojlund is technically excellent.Gabriel Jesus really isn't all that. I expect Højlund to become a better player than him. There probably isn't much between them as it is.
100%. Only people that think Jesus is world class or that Hojlund won’t become better is Arsenal fans.Gabriel Jesus really isn't all that. I expect Højlund to become a better player than him. There probably isn't much between them as it is.
Pretty silly comment, the players were compared with some saying Hojlund is already as good, so its not of course, as some posters disagree with you.
Whether he will become better or not remains to be seen, hopefully, he does.
I’m trying to wrap my head around how the same poster can write these three lines just minutes apart.Jesus is a far better player today. Its not even a debate. Hopefully Hojlund can reach and surpass his level that would be great.
Because some posters (who I was referring to there) did not agree with my view (which is Jesus is obviously better)I’m trying to wrap my head around how the same poster can write these three lines just minutes apart.
I think everyone will be disappointed if he doesn’t even reach Jesus’ level
Spent his time at City as a backup and he’s hardly set the world on fire at Arsenal he seems to pick up too many injuries
Yes?So he is weak technically now?
It’s just Arsenal fans bringing him as a bench mark. Apparently he’s levels above Hojlund.Why is Gabriel Jesus being used as a benchmark for other players? He's absolute dog-shit.
Ok, this is where I draw the line: o
That means "island" in Danish.Idea for a nickname: Let’s just call him Ø
That means "island" in Danish.
Took me minuteWhich is basically his name.
He's like top 10 in the Prem in terms of minutes per (open) goal contribution ever, that's a decent benchmark.It’s just Arsenal fans bringing him as a bench mark. Apparently he’s levels above Hojlund.
Works in French as well, I suppose.Which is basically his name.
Yes?
Sure, but what does it mean in Islandic?That means "island" in Danish.
He's better technically than Haaland.Yes?
Works in French as well, I suppose.
When they get around to it, they will recognize his allotted shirt number has been retired in an attempt from the club to distance itself from violence towards partners. His new number will be ф, which we don’t have either.How long does it take to get that?
If my bluffmaker’s guide to French is correct, H is silent at the beginning of words in french. Ø is nonexistent, so how would you pronounce ‘Jlund’ in French?How?
Oh oh I had French for a few years:If my bluffmaker’s guide to French is correct, H is silent at the beginning of words in french. Ø is nonexistent, so how would you pronounce ‘Jlund’ in French?
If my bluffmaker’s guide to French is correct, H is silent at the beginning of words in french. Ø is nonexistent, so how would you pronounce ‘Jlund’ in French?
Martial’s was even better than Jesus. Says everything you need to know about that stat.He's like top 10 in the Prem in terms of minutes per (open) goal contribution ever, that's a decent benchmark.
Try pronouncing this thenWell we can't use french rules for a foreign word. A french would try to pronounce it like a danish or not pronounce it at all.
Martial’s was even better than Jesus. Says everything you need to know about that stat.
This is incorrect. Martial is at 140 and Jesus is at 108.Martial’s was even better than Jesus. Says everything you need to know about that stat.
I’m not even going to argue with that because I’d probably agree.That it's fairly accurate? Because a fit Martial was better than Jesus by some distance.