Have to disagree with this. Højlund is at the age where a lot of center forwards “figure things out”, and come up leaps and bounds in terms of productivity (Shevchenko, Eto'o, Batistuta, Villa, Cavani, Shearer, van Nistelrooy and so forth... all of them experienced rapid transformation in their early 20s), so they need to be playing as much as possible (not biding their time as the apprentice to someone else).
Placing a stumbling block in his path is unlikely to be the most prudent manoeuver; and signing someone who is more established would be short-sighted when you could argue that Højlund is already a 20+ goals striker with better service and the luxury of taking penalties.
Take Harry Kane's 2015—16 season as a point of comparison, for example...
- 22 non-penalty goals in 4,027 minutes = 183 minutes per goal
- 16 non-penalty goals in 3,072 minutes = 192 minutes per goal for Højlund
Hardly anything in there with regard to production, and this is the latter's first season in a new league (and the fourth new league in a bit more than 2 seasons: Danish Superliga, Austrian Bundesliga, Serie A, Premier League). He needs better coaching, stability, a proper pre-season and things of that nature.
We should be signing someone who is versatile, creative and can play across the forward line or a
super-sub type who is okay with a somewhat limited function, not someone who directly replaces Højlund in the starting lineup.