Another expensive mistake.
You know there is a middle ground. He's not a £70m player, probably half that. He may come good, he may not. But he has show little IMO to show elite potential, there were crosses against Wigan and he missed them. Is all he can do get on the end of crosses, as a more possession based team wont necessarily do a lot of that either. Lets see. But not being impressed by what I see doesn't mean we write him off, why would I or anyone want him to fail. Conversely the fan boys who want to talk him up and talk of unique attributes need a reality check. Bottom line our appalling recruitment meant we massively overpaid for a player who should be back up and not a starter.
On the bolded part, see post from @KiD MoYeS which expelained my concerns:He didnt get found out by defenders. He is still getting in to good positions, but he is doing it a lot less and his runs are different which point more towards something happening in training, him trying to adapt to his team mates (which in this case is a bad thing).
He has had very good finishes and consistently had it before joining us. It wasnt some flash thing. And the idea that international football and champions league doesnt count is simply nonsense. If that was the case English teams should be cruising the champions league and that really hasnt happened.
Højlund is a young striker talent asked to play the main striker, not only in one of the biggest clubs in the world, but also one of the worst attacks in the league. Putting that all on "well he must be trash just get a new one" is silly.
Given that most our attacking talent is struggling hard to score points to a much bigger issue.
On the bolded part, see post from @KiD MoYeS which expelained my concerns:
I also mentioned that looking back at his Serie A highlights, it looked like a lot of his good moments there were down to physical superiority - which concerns me about succeeding in the Premier League, which is generally a faster paced and more physical league.
Being critical of a player/manager doesn't equate to writing them off, or being a hater as some people like to say.That and people are expecting him to have a higher chance conversion rate than Haaland too.
People in this thread chatting about how you cant criticise him or some “Top Red committee” bullshit are ridiculous, it’s just that some of us don’t want to write a young player off after a few months, like when did this become such a common practice? You write like you all want him to fail with half of your posts being way OTT and talking about shit that hasn’t happened or making shit up to get your point across, I don’t think i’ve seen such vitriol for a young player a few months into his career with us.
Nobody is taking offense to any criticism, he deserves some criticism, i’m not saying he doesn’t. But I don’t know if you’ve noticed the posts are way more than just some light criticism. He’s been called all sorts in here and basically written off as an expensive flop who can’t do any of the basics right and might as well just not be a footballer and we should get rid asap, after a few months. Where as I see it differently and see a young player who is joint top scorer in all competitions in a terrible team where nobody is scoring much with great attributes that can be built upon, maybe in a few seasons he’s not great and then we have the conversation about moving him on, but after a few months??Being critical of a player/manager doesn't equate to writing them off, or being a hater as some people like to say.
We all want him to succeed, because we want the club to succeed. But some of us just say it like it is and call a spade a spade, rather than sugarcoating the truth or turning a blind eye to it. It's not our problem if you decide to take offence to criticism of Hojlund and its not going to make him less of an underwhelming striker by you doing so
Yeah his positioning is really good, seems to do well defensively and gets into the 6 yard box more than anyone I can think of post-Fergie apart from Cavani.
Finishing has been poor, which I can accept in a 20 year old who should be our backup #9 right now, but I think he looks a bit lost when he gets a defender 1 on 1 which isn't ideal. I'm not expecting Romario, but you don't get the sense he's gonna do much but get so wide he's gonna have to shoot tamely from a bad angle.
Yeah the problem with this is that PSG had already bid 50 million before we had agreed to buy him, so what good does bidding 35 million do?I think he has a bright future but paying 70 million pound is just a desperate move. He is at most a 35 million striker and a backup one. United suck at transfer and will buy whatever the manager wants. Erik should be gone for a season striker and goes for him for a 35 million bid. Once they know he is only a backup, they won't ask for 70 million. If United plays poker, they will lose their shirts and pants.
Yeah the problem with this is that PSG had already bid 50 million before we had agreed to buy him, so what good does bidding 35 million do?
People are saying he was too expensive, and I agree, he was, but PSG had bid 50 million, Atalanta didn't want to let him go, and he is a young talented player who was on a long contract, with a relatively low amount of striking options going for good prices. People really shouldn't be that shocked at the money paid given todays climate.
Like ? Not trying to wum but the striker market is dry. We took a gamble and invested in a potential. Overpaid by about 20m .I don't think anyone with sane thought was expecting this kid to be a hit the very first season.I would find other target. He is still unproven talent for 70 million.
A lot of people can’t see past the fee. Like you say, there are market circumstances that make the whole transaction far less binary.Like ? Not trying to wum but the striker market is dry. We took a gamble and invested in a potential. Overpaid by about 20m .I don't think anyone with sane thought was expecting this kid to be a hit the very first season.
this new trend of saying mctominay is the reason he cant score is really childish. nobody is buying that, everyone knows one player is just the more fashionable.Its incredible how much flack this guy is getting because he doesn't get on the end of the non existent crosses from Antony and Rashford.
I can't believe he's not scoring when Bruno just refuses to pass to him.
Unbelievable how he can't finish, when McTominay literally gets in his way all the time.
A lot of people can’t see past the fee. Like you say, there are market circumstances that make the whole transaction far less binary.
THe service this lad gets is diabolical. Rashford has two ‘moves’, cut inside and shoot, go outside and run down a blind alley. He’s pretty much as one footed as Antony when it comes to feeding balls into the box.
How anyone can thrive with that level of ‘service’ is incomprehensible (and makes buying someone like Osimhen an even bigger gamble).
Rasmussen has shown a lot of potential, and that’s what we paid for. It’s up to the club to unlock that potential and get a good ROI.
Need to buy more players that are 23/24 years old if you’re going to spending the big cash. Players at 20 aren’t guaranteed to make it to the next level. Would rather he had another few years of Serie A to see if he was up to it. One season with 9 league goals is hardly phenomenon level.
Remember when a 19 year old Rooney was volleying an incredible equaliser against Newcastle or when a 20 year old Ronaldo was scoring the goal of season against Portsmouth in early 2006? Those are the moments when you realise you are watching a special talent. We’ve seen nothing of that nature from Hojlund which would justify putting him on that level.
Oh, just two of the greatest talents of the 2000s? One of them was one of the best 19 year olds ever seen, and the other guy went on to become the greatest goalscorer ever and at least a top 5 player of all time.
Even just comparing those 2's careers will tell you that development is often not linear, so why are you comparing a completely different player to them 20 years later?
What were Lewandowski and Drogba doing at 20? See, it goes both ways.
And all of these examples you and I listed are irrelevant to Hojlund.
You mean like when he skilled past VdV and outran him? This is completely made upGood finish. Completely dominated by Romero and Van de Ven otherwise.
Good finish. Completely dominated by Romero and Van de Ven otherwise.
Come on, we have no midfield and been outplayed. Dominated?Good finish. Completely dominated by Romero and Van de Ven otherwise.
Good finish. Completely dominated by Romero and Van de Ven otherwise.