If he wasn’t United player and was recruited as the main striker for any other top 6 team in the league, we would be laughing our assess off and the posts about his “clear world class potential” or suggestions his ceiling is higher than Forlan’s would most likely be called delusional, wishful thinking at best.
no doubt the lad is talented but every game shows us that he’s levels from the standard required to start for a team with our ambitions. Rarely does it happen that a player improves leaps and bounds over a short period of time - it’s not impossible, but rational thing now is to expect that Hojlund would need at least another season or two before getting anyhow decent.
what worries me most is not even that we got the inexperienced guy way of the first team’s level, but the fact that he doesn’t seem at all adapted to the game ETH wants to play. Many here posted that he’s not getting the service as our wide forwards don’t cross enough and play to his strengths. But this is ETH game plan, always was and will continue to be - we are playing with inside forwards that prefer to cut in rather than cross, Garnacho is right footed left winger, Antony a left footed right winger, they’ll never ping infinite crosses. In such system the striker has to be much more involved in the build up, his passing and vision should be as good as finishing and his technical skills on par with his off the ball movement. He lack in the key departments for his role in the current tactic and it feels like another signing done without considering whether the player actually fits the tactic and the role. Our recruitment is truly abysmal