I said it at the time, bringing in a guy woefully unequipped for the role you were asking of him for 6 months, only to then sack him before he could step up to the role we needed him for was utter madness.
Just a complete lack of joined up thinking and a scandalous pissing up the wall of half a season.
When he started discussing club affairs in the press, I said it suggested he wasn't being listened to by the people who mattered. The terms in which he left showed there was a fundamental breakdown between what he thought the club needs and what our owners and board think.
I don't think the guy is a genius or some sort of footballing revolutionary. He was merely acknowledging problems that pretty much any fan with eyes can see, and his solutions were just systems and ideas that are proven to be successful in modern football clubs around Europe.
The fact that his views were so abhorrent to our owners and executives, so sure in their own ideas and methods despite a decade of negligence, says everything you need to know about the club and it's priorities.