stevoc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 22,676
Ralf has a 1.65 points per game in the league since taking over, which is an improvement over Ole's 1.41 before he got fired this season. It's better than Mourinho's 1.61 the season he got fired. Just below Moyes 1.67 (with a team that was the defending champion), and LVG's 1.73 in his second season.
Is it good enough? Of course not. But people are going overboard talking about him as if he is by far the worst of them all, considering that he walked into by far the worst situation out of any of them. Obviously the last 6-7 weeks has been a shit show (although still better than what we were doing under Ole), but before that he'd done a decent job stabilising the ship. It should also be noted that recently he's had about 9 players out who would all have been expected to start a significant amount of matches at the start of the season.
How exactly?
Ralf's overall win percentage 40% is now lower than the teams win percentage in the 20 games before he took over 45% (and even slightly worse than just Solskjaer's record over 17 games this season that seen him rightly sacked). Since the 1-0 win over West Ham in January we've only won 4 out of 15 games, losing 6 and drawing 5. By any metric that's shocking form, most probably the worst period of form the club has experienced in decades.
If he is making strong recommendations behinds the scenes that the board are listening to, then it'll end up being well worth it IMO. Obviously we would have hoped that he would have got top 4, but the most important thing for me was always that he'd provide a proper review of the football side of the club by a person with experience in doing so.
And if he isn't being listened to?