Ralf Rangnick | ex-interim manager | does anyone rate him?

Status
Not open for further replies.
How's it dopey when it's almost verbatim from some of the posts in here post-arsenal? How many more times are people going to look for the simplest answer over and over and not expand that it's much more complex than a manager?

I think most comments on here are dopey as shit to be fair.

I pointed out the interim manager has done a poor job at being a manager, it’s just a statement of fact. Of course there are other root factors at play that are more important to fix, but his performance has also made them root issues even worse.
 
Ole would have missed top 4 in 2019-2020, if he hadn't spend 200 millions and Leicester had collapsed. And he was already the manager for 6 months in the previous season. LVG missed it in his second season. Yet, people expected that RR would secure top 4 with a team that was losing right and left, and with losing one key player and 2 squad options in the winter.
OK.

Its an objective discussion. Whether or not its fair is irrelevant to our league position. We are missing out on CL this season, and Ralf is the interim manager. Both objective facts.

There is so much myth being put on this consultancy role and how Ralf is going to reshape the club like football Gandalf.

Ralf has not actually ever worked for one of the top tier clubs in Europe unless RB Leipzig is counted in that echelon.

I dont doubt Ralf has a lot to contribute, but we are letting the "gegenpress scholar" articles color the discussion a bit much here.
 
Should probably compare him to Ole’s first six months then for a fair comparison
Not really.

We are far worse off this time. Defence has completely lost confidence with Maguire and Shaw falling to pieces. Even young talents like Rashford and Martial who were quite good back then have become rubbish. We were in a better place when Jose left in terms of individual player form.
 
He’s sometimes tactically weak and more outspoken but I don’t know what more coaching can Ralf do for getting us top 4? This team can’t press for more than 30 min, our striking option is only a 37y old, no reinforcements in January + lingard, PRashford dressing room leaks to media.

The reason his interim job looks failure is, Individual errors and penalty misses by our players + referee union is clear that we don’t reach top 4 or fa cup wins.

Remember how many open play chances we missed since his appointment + an important penalty yesterday. I’m sure if we did finish our chances, we’d be 10-12 points ahead in table. We need players who don’t succumb to pressure, we need players who has the character to challenge referees, we need players to follow coach’s instructions.

I see his appointment as first step of a major change towards the club’s future. Looking forward to his remaining press conferences because that’s far more entertaining than the match.

So much of that post is made with your Utd brand spectacles on.
-Prem stats show that you missed 2 pens this season, and that you had 2 pens missed *against* you this season.

-Almost all goals involve individual errors, you just only remember the ones your players commit

- Referees Union? I don’t know a single fan of any club who comes away after a disappointing season/result without blaming the ref somewhere along the line. You’re just doing that classic thing of looking to blame external factors because you are emotionally invested in the result and it’s nice to have a 3rd party to pin your frustrations on.
 
Not really.

We are far worse off this time. Defence has completely lost confidence with Maguire and Shaw falling to pieces. Even young talents like Rashford and Martial who were quite good back then have become rubbish. We were in a better place when Jose left in terms of individual player form.

Well not really. When Ralf came in we were on the back of a victory in Villarreal (Europa League champions), a draw at Chelsea (Champions League holders) and a win over Arsenal. Things were looking up.

The weeks before that we’re very poor, we put wheels back on and Ralf undid the nuts so they came straight back off.
 
Not really.

We are far worse off this time. Defence has completely lost confidence with Maguire and Shaw falling to pieces. Even young talents like Rashford and Martial who were quite good back then have become rubbish. We were in a better place when Jose left in terms of individual player form.

But weren’t those exact accusations levelled against Mourinho’s last few months? I struggle to see how you think that player confidence and team unity was lower when Mourinho was sacked than when OGS was sacked.
 
Well not really. When Ralf came in we were on the back of a victory in Villarreal (Europa League champions), a draw at Chelsea (Champions League holders) and a win over Arsenal. Things were looking up.

The weeks before that we’re very poor, we put wheels back on and Ralf undid the nuts so they came straight back off.
Trying to change the negative individualistic bullshit style of play that Jose and Ole instilled will result in pain.

And we didn't put the weeks back on. We had a couple of okay results in a miserable season where lost Greenwood, rashford, martial, Maguire, awb, Shaw etc in one way or another. I've never seen such a collapse in form at United. When Jose left the individuals weren't doing as badly. Although his management was getting worse. Hence there was more room for thr bump.

Either way it doesn't matter. This culling of the squad is what is needed. Papering over Crack in Ole fashion will not result in success.
 
Ditto OGS picking up after Mourinho. That’s generally what happens when you change a manager mid season.
Not always. Depends on the circumstances and the form/mindset of the players in charge.

Either way, I prefer us losing top 4 and getting ETH than bumbling our way somehow into top 4 and 5 years of mediocrity under Ole.
 
Not always. Depends on the circumstances and the form/mindset of the players in charge.

Either I prefer us losing top 4 and getting ETH than bumbling our way somehow into top 4 and 5 years of mediocrity under Ole.

I agree with that to be fair.
 
Trying to change the negative individualistic bullshit style of play that Jose and Ole instilled will result in pain.

And we didn't put the weeks back on. We had a couple of okay results in a miserable season where lost Greenwood, rashford, martial, Maguire, awb, Shaw etc in one way or another. I've never seen such a collapse in form at United. When Jose left the individuals weren't doing as badly. Although his management was getting worse. Hence there was more room for thr bump.

Either way it doesn't matter. This culling of the squad is what is needed. Papering over Crack in Ole fashion will not result in success.

I fully agree with the last paragraph, for what it’s worth.
 
Should probably compare him to Ole’s first six months then for a fair comparison
I don't think it's the same situation. The team was in a meltdown almost purely because of the manager at that time, so Ole coming in was able to quickly refresh everything. A lot of the key players were also young and still seemed hungry.

There seems to be a lot more wrong now than just unhappiness with the manager, so Rangnick wasn't able to get such an easy new manager bounce (he still did get one, just not to the same extreme). A lot of those same players are still here now and they are in the middle (or later) of their career and seem completely set in their ways, not willing to go out of their comfort zone. Our decline in results over the last two months has also coincided with a very significant injury list which I think people don't take into account. Shaw, Varane, Lindelof, Fred, Mctominay, Pogba, Ronaldo, Cavani have all had periods out, while we loaned Martial out and then immediately lost Greenwood as well.

Put it this way, the situation was so bad that I'm not sure that even Conte (who has a decent claim to be one of the top 5 managers in the world) would have been able to get us top 4. Obviously he would have had a better chance than Rangnick did and I don't think things would have gotten quite so bad, but it's very debatable one way or the other. And then obviously Conte would have wanted the job fulltime, and we would have continued another couple of seasons of defensive boring football with a toxic collapse (at least between Conte and the board) at the end of it. There's no way to know for sure yet, but the hope is that Rangnick will be the best long-term appointment. If it turns out we don't really listen to any of the recommendations that he makes then yes, it was a poor appointment. But hopefully that won't be the case.
 
So much of that post is made with your Utd brand spectacles on.
-Prem stats show that you missed 2 pens this season, and that you had 2 pens missed *against* you this season.

-Almost all goals involve individual errors, you just only remember the ones your players commit

- Referees Union? I don’t know a single fan of any club who comes away after a disappointing season/result without blaming the ref somewhere along the line. You’re just doing that classic thing of looking to blame external factors because you are emotionally invested in the result and it’s nice to have a 3rd party to pin your frustrations on.

You’ve conveniently ignored the open play chances we missed and dressing room leaks that I highlighted as reasons.

Individual errors happens but try watching Maguire defensive errors this season, you’d know what I mean.

And have you seen the fa cup boro handball incident leading to goal + cedric pushing the ball away yesterday? Sounds silly but Its hard to disbelieve conspiracy.
 
I’m not sure of the relevance of picking OGS worst half-season and Mourinho’s worst half-season as comparators. I don’t know the stats but surely over their tenures both JM and OGS were both significantly better. Which means he’s achieved worse results than all his predecessors since Moyes left.
Win% all matches:
Mourinho 58.33% (2nd best win% as United manager, Sir Alex nr 1 at 59.67%
Ole 54.17% ( 3rd best, belive it or not)
Rangnick 40.00% (13th best)


Also, Rangnick has the lowest goals scored per game(1,32) since caretaker manager Jimmy Murphy in 1958. Ole has the highest goals per game (1,92) since Sir Matt Busbys first periode (45-69).

Something went really, really wrong this season, but cherry picking those few terrible months to prove how bad he was, isn't fair on Ole. He wasn't great, but far from as hopeless as most United fans claims.
 
That's a gross exaggeration. And he's been here SIX MONTHS already. At what point is it going to be his fault? I'm asking you.
I'll answer you. Can we say RR is at fault for this abysmal season? No, that's more down to Ole and efforts in 'building' this team which resulted in the first half of the season collapse and partly on RR for failing to turn it around. Has RR does a good job as manager ? Of course not. I've been massively disappointed by him as our manager. But at the same time I believe it's important to give him an important role at the executive level to help build us back up.
 
I don't think it's the same situation. The team was in a meltdown almost purely because of the manager at that time, so Ole coming in was able to quickly refresh everything. A lot of the key players were also young and still seemed hungry.

There seems to be a lot more wrong now than just unhappiness with the manager, so Rangnick wasn't able to get such an easy new manager bounce (he still did get one, just not to the same extreme). A lot of those same players are still here now and they are in the middle (or later) of their career and seem completely set in their ways, not willing to go out of their comfort zone. Our decline in results over the last two months has also coincided with a very significant injury list which I think people don't take into account. Shaw, Varane, Lindelof, Fred, Mctominay, Pogba, Ronaldo, Cavani have all had periods out, while we loaned Martial out and then immediately lost Greenwood as well.

Put it this way, the situation was so bad that I'm not sure that even Conte (who has a decent claim to be one of the top 5 managers in the world) would have been able to get us top 4. Obviously he would have had a better chance than Rangnick did and I don't think things would have gotten quite so bad, but it's very debatable one way or the other. And then obviously Conte would have wanted the job fulltime, and we would have continued another couple of seasons of defensive boring football with a toxic collapse (at least between Conte and the board) at the end of it. There's no way to know for sure yet, but the hope is that Rangnick will be the best long-term appointment. If it turns out we don't really listen to any of the recommendations that he makes then yes, it was a poor appointment. But hopefully that won't be the case.

Oh I fully agree it’s long term probably the right move. Albeit him straight in above a manager who could perform that role better would have been preferable, but I’ve no issue. As I mentioned… somewhere on here earlier this morning, we’re in a ripping the plaster off stage. We kinda just have to grin and bear it.
You’ve conveniently ignored the open play chances we missed and dressing room leaks that I highlighted as reasons.

Individual errors happens but try watching Maguire defensive errors this season, you’d know what I mean.

And have you seen the fa cup boro handball incident leading to goal + cedric pushing the ball away yesterday? Sounds silly but Its hard to disbelieve conspiracy.

There isn’t a conspiracy. It’s embarrassing to suggest there is. Every football fan in the world can point to X amount of incidents in a season to “prove” a conspiracy against their club.
 
I would be very harsh with Rangnick myself if:

1. He took charge before the season started and had bought players he believe in and sold some he don’t believe in.

2. Did not inherit a club and players who was already fecked up.

3. A team that has spit out manager after manager.

He never stood a chance imo. The most important thing now is a ruthless clear out from top to bottom. Without one we will just continue this bad pattern.

Agree with you.
The primary reason he never stood a chance was down to the players and player power going unchecked. Mainly down to Ole.

There are far too many factions within the club. None of them pulling in the same direction. And yet another manager (lamb to the slaughter) will not succeed until that player power faction is routed out once and for all.
To my mind, that has to be the absolute number 1 priority.
Kick them out of the club and replace with hungry players with the right character and attitude.
 
I trust him to make the right judgement on players to advise Ten Hag but he's clearly way out of his depth as a manager.

His man management has been absolutely terrible almost from day 1 and he takes no responsibility himself. We're at the stage where he's been throwing the players under the bus in every press conference for weeks, it's obvious that you can't do that and then expect the players to perform. That's not to defend them because they likely deserve it, but when a guy like Mourinho who's won it all has found out that doesn't work you can't expect a managerial nobody who's in the job temporarily to get away with it. Do that privately whilst you're still competing and then go public at the end of the season if it's necessary.

He'd make an excellent politician tbh. Talks a very good game but fails to deliver.
 
Win% all matches:
Mourinho 58.33% (2nd best win% as United manager, Sir Alex nr 1 at 59.67%
Ole 54.17% ( 3rd best, belive it or not)
Rangnick 40.00% (13th best)


Also, Rangnick has the lowest goals scored per game(1,32) since caretaker manager Jimmy Murphy in 1958. Ole has the highest goals per game (1,92) since Sir Matt Busbys first periode (45-69).

Something went really, really wrong this season, but cherry picking those few terrible months to prove how bad he was, isn't fair on Ole. He wasn't great, but far from as hopeless as most United fans claims.
I agree it's not fair on Ole to only talk about what happened this season, but that is the direct situation that Rangnick walked into. As you said something went very wrong this season, and that had the effect that both Ole and Rangnick were put in an almost no-win situation. If it's not fair to judge Ole on that (the one who built the team over the last few years) it's something that absolutely needs to be taken into account when talking about Rangnick's reign.
 
Fact is you have no idea about him. You're just looking at results rather than any context or understanding of his wider remit.
The context and understanding of his wider remit that Rangnick supporters have shown here is made up. It's contradicted by basically every public and private statement made by him and anyone involved with the club. It's fantasy and wishful thinking, not reality.
 
You’ve conveniently ignored the open play chances we missed and dressing room leaks that I highlighted as reasons.

Individual errors happens but try watching Maguire defensive errors this season, you’d know what I mean.

And have you seen the fa cup boro handball incident leading to goal + cedric pushing the ball away yesterday? Sounds silly but Its hard to disbelieve conspiracy.

I’ve no way of calculating the open play chances you refer to, but again I’d assume you are more likely to remember the chances you missed rather than the chances you got away with. If you continually miss good chances and your opponents don’t then that would be reflected in xG, right? You’d at least have one form of objective opinion to back up your point. How many missed chances do you think city or Liverpool have had this season? I’d put money on them having had more failed chances than Utd have had.
I think the Boro decision was legitimately wrong, the Cedric one is less clear to me at least, given the actual wording of the rules. But again, you are only remembering the decisions that went against you, which is typical for a emotionally invested fan. I can remember 101 bad decisions and missed chances that negatively affected Ipswich, and virtually none that benefitted us. That doesn’t mean that there’s a Ref’s Union conspiracy against Ipswich, it means I’m biased, but at least I can recognise it!
 
Win% all matches:
Mourinho 58.33% (2nd best win% as United manager, Sir Alex nr 1 at 59.67%
Ole 54.17% ( 3rd best, belive it or not)
Rangnick 40.00% (13th best)

Exactly, it’s like saying that other than that time a striker scored 7 goals in 5 games, his goal return has been poor. It’s so obviously illogical.

Also, Rangnick has the lowest goals scored per game(1,32) since caretaker manager Jimmy Murphy in 1958. Ole has the highest goals per game (1,92) since Sir Matt Busbys first periode (45-69).

Something went really, really wrong this season, but cherry picking those few terrible months to prove how bad he was, isn't fair on Ole. He wasn't great, but far from as hopeless as most United fans claims.
 
I'll answer you. Can we say RR is at fault for this abysmal season? No, that's more down to Ole and efforts in 'building' this team which resulted in the first half of the season collapse and partly on RR for failing to turn it around. Has RR does a good job as manager ? Of course not. I've been massively disappointed by him as our manager. But at the same time I believe it's important to give him an important role at the executive level to help build us back up.
The team was NOT in complete meltdown when Ole left and was salvageable when Rangnick came in. He rocked up in November, which was more than enough time to have an impact. I would give him credit if he had at least steadied the ship but under him we ARE in total meltdown.

You can't pin it all on Ole and absolve Rangnick of any responsibility. The fact is the team is a lot worse under him, however people want to dress it up or make excuses.
 
The context and understanding of his wider remit that Rangnick supporters have shown here is made up. It's contradicted by basically every public and private statement made by him and anyone involved with the club. It's fantasy and wishful thinking, not reality.
Exactly, he's said numerous times that he basically doesn't know what his role will be at the end of the season and his job has been to focus on getting results.
 
It does seems like Ralf has come in and told the club higher ups that the current team needs replacing. Which is good news for the future but he shouldn’t be surprised the players he is calling shite aren’t listening to him.
 
Agree with you.
The primary reason he never stood a chance was down to the players and player power going unchecked. Mainly down to Ole.

There are far too many factions within the club. None of them pulling in the same direction. And yet another manager (lamb to the slaughter) will not succeed until that player power faction is routed out once and for all.
To my mind, that has to be the absolute number 1 priority.
Kick them out of the club and replace with hungry players with the right character and attitude.

I would like someone to explain why this has not been done sooner. It is even now not a given it will be done, though I think it will now. It’s just so blatantly obvious it must be done. It has been obvious for quite some time.

Ole did not help the situation at all, he just made it worse imo. I hoped for a while he had a perfect long term plan, but he did not. I foolishly fooled myself a long time under him.
 
The team was NOT in complete meltdown when Ole left and was salvageable when Rangnick came in. He rocked up in November, which was more than enough time to have an impact. I would give him credit if he had at least steadied the ship but under him we ARE in total meltdown.

You can't pin it all on Ole and absolve Rangnick of any responsibility. The fact is the team is a lot worse under him, however people want to dress it up or make excuses.
Clearly not reading properly
 
If it's not fair to judge Ole on that (the one who built the team over the last few years) it's something that absolutely needs to be taken into account when talking about Rangnick's reign.
Oh yes, Rangnick was handed a real problem. I would have hoped to see more progress made in six months, but it was never an easy job.

Personally i think the problem is 80% psychological, plus a few holes in the squad (mainly central midfield). Something is completely rotten in the dressing room. Restore the atmosphere, gain some confidence, and a lot is fixed.
 
What went wrong this season was bringing Ronaldo back and putting a load of players noses out of joint (again). They did it before with Martial when they bought Zlatan in and that was arguably the start of his lack of motivation. Then they did it again bringing Cavani in and stunting the development of one of Rashford, Martial or Greenwood.

Now you've got Ronnie "demanding more" and "setting the standards" while making a lot of the dressing room unhappy. Every time he scores though you have Goldbridge creaming his pants and giving it "People say Ronaldo's the problem sit down". Well yeah 2 thirds of a squad that a) went unbeaten away for a season b) finished 2nd in the League and c) got to the EL final are now putting in lesser performances as a result.

Remember a couple of seasons ago our front 3 of Rashford, Martial and Greenwood were one of the highest scoring front 3s around and they were all young and hungry. Yet we kept putting them to the side to bring in older players in the sunset of their careers and Ronaldo was just the cherry on top of the cake.
 
It does seems like Ralf has come in and told the club higher ups that the current team needs replacing. Which is good news for the future but he shouldn’t be surprised the players he is calling shite aren’t listening to him.
True, but if he said they were amazing etc would they even be getting replaced this summer? Yes he should be getting better results but I'm glad he's been saying what he’s saying - in public and to the board - because now it looks like things are actually set to maybe change for the better for the first time in over 10 odd years. I can live with some bad results and no CL football for a season if it means the longer term future of the club finally gets on the right track starting this summer.
 
INTERIM manager with a 2 year consultancy role. What do you think is the more significant role? It’s an easy one, I’m sure you and others will figure it out soon.

Your posts on this subject are starting to make little sense mate. First off Ralf Rangnick is here to manage Manchester United, that is and has been his one and only job since December and will be until next month.

As for which job is more significant, yeah it is an easy one. The manager's job Interim or otherwise is more significant to the fortunes of the club and by a fair stretch than any part time role up stairs. And going of his last press conference Ralf doesn't even sound too sure that he will be at United for the next 2 years as a consultant.

For what it's worth Ed Woodward is also rumoured to be taking up a consultancy role, do you think he'll also have a more significant role than the manager?
 
The context and understanding of his wider remit that Rangnick supporters have shown here is made up. It's contradicted by basically every public and private statement made by him and anyone involved with the club. It's fantasy and wishful thinking, not reality.
How do you know private statements made by him?

He wouldn't, rightly, divulge anything detailed publicly by way of his influence. But what we do know is Murtough favours him highly, that he was a big advocate of ETH, that he was very critical of our transfers and that he has been publicly speaking of late about what needs to be done. Since then we hired ETH, we are re-structuring our scouting and there are reports that Rangnick will pass his recommendations about the squad and required rebuild to the manager and board in the next role.

That's not normal for managers just coming in for an interim role and then fecking off.
 
I dont doubt Ralf has a lot to contribute, but we are letting the "gegenpress scholar" articles color the discussion a bit much here.

The point is that he's not there to win games. He's there to do an extended pre-season and highlight what needs doing in order to implement a successful transition to Gegenpress. Getting fourth would have been a bonus.

The people trying to make direct comparisons between Ole and Ralf are missing the point. Ole was the culmination of a decade of mismanagement at all levels of the club. Ralf is ground zero of the rebuild.
 
Your posts on this subject are starting to make little sense mate. First off Ralf Rangnick is here to manage Manchester United, that is and has been his one and only job since December and will be until next month.

As for which job is more significant, yeah it is an easy one. The manager's job Interim or otherwise is more significant to the fortunes of the club and by a fair stretch than any part time role up stairs. And going of his last press conference Ralf doesn't even sound too sure that he will be at United for the next 2 years as a consultant.

For what it's worth Ed Woodward is also rumoured to be taking up a consultancy role, do you think he'll also have a more significant role than the manager?
I'd take no top 4 and a broken squad for 6 months if it meant we had a proper structure and picture of how we will reshape the squad, hire the new manager and implement a proper style beyond then.

I wholeheartedly argue the latter is more important in Ralf's remit. That's not to say the interim manager role isn't important, but his work upstairs is of greater importance.
 
Should probably compare him to Ole’s first six months then for a fair comparison

Brilliant idea and one that actually exposes the players even more:

Ole - former player who is adored by Old Trafford

Comes in and tells players to play freely, express themselves. A breath of fresh air versus the stifled football of Mourinho and more importantly, a lot less criticism of the players themselves.

Big winning run. Leaks on how great everything is.

Going gets tough. Ole starts calling players out. Lose a top 4 finish that seemed in reach.

Ragnik - no history with United, stepping in with an expiration date not for consideration as permanent manager but as a consultant or dof type role.

Comes in and tells players to buckle down and work harder, be more tactically disciplined.

First game shows minor promise and then there's a distinct fall in play and a major dissociation between the type of nuances on the field Ragnik keeps talking about versus what the players often display.

The team stops the freefall from end of Ole's tenure but isn't able to step it up to mount a serious challenge for top 4 finish.

Leaks on how terrible everything is.
 
Because A) recent results give a better indication of the direction you are headed in hence a board judging Ole would give far more importance to abysmal form in the last 7 than a few wins before that. B) Ole was managing the team when we completely fell apart so he has a big hand in our failures this season as a whole (not just till he was sacked). This void of confidence and disharmony happened under his tutelage. Rangnick couldn't fix it of course.

I made a point about Rangnicks last 15 games. So all I'm doing is comparing like for like. Having said that Solskjaer (or any manager) probably would have also got sacked after the last 7 games as well. Certainly I don't see how manager permanent manager could have survived the run of form we've had since January.
 
I think the results of his term as manager have been poor. How much is due to the fact that he is interim amd the players don't care I don't know. I think the Glazers hoped he could perform a miracle and get top 4. But without investing in January, I think they probably were not that serious about making top 4. Anyway, it no longer matters. Clean slate incoming. And Ralf will use his stint as interim to point out which parts need pruning and which parts need burning.

A miracle?

Jesus, despite only winning 4 games since January we were still within a few points of 4th until yesterday. A good manager would have got this team finishing 4th.
 
You could be right, but I read it as that the contract is with his company for a certain period of consultancy.

If he was employed by the club directly, he surely would have been given a proper title?

Usually but that's assuming the club actually had/s a plan in mind for what his role (if any) will actually be. Ralf has been here for 6 month's and even he doesn't seem to know what his position will be and what responsibilities he will have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.