Many neutrals still think the Glazers are "okay" so I do not think their opinions should hold much weight.
I agree that the manager's job is to improve and motivate the players, but when players do not want to even run, why is that the manager's fault? In my view, motivation from the manager is more like the "extra 5-10%" on top of the "100%" the players should already be doing. It should not be about getting the players to the 100% - that should instead be a basic requirement of any footballer.
I agree he has failed to provide that "extra 10%". Maybe the players do not appreciate his honesty or maybe it is something else. It is hard to say where it has gone wrong and why in this regard. Players release books all the time so we will probably find out in a few months or years what really happened. However, that 10% is not the reason we did not turn up against Everton for example.
With regards to his tactics, I saw him trying to change things and eventually resort back to the original formation. I am frustrated with his team selection. I hated seeing two goalkeepers on the bench. I do not like seeing Mata getting game time over Hannibal. The latter has played international football now. He can get some more minutes and we can then assess here his development is at. I do not understand why Maguire was not dropped consistently.
But I find it harsh to be critical, largely because a lot of hurdles existed which have made implementing something substantially different quite challenging. You could argue it is a perfect storm of issues:
- Injuries/ absentees (Cavani, Varane & Greenwood)
- Players determined to leave (Martial)
- Not a full range of his own coaching staff
- No transfers coming in January
- Complete loss of form in some players (Rashford, Maguire)
- Some players possibly not able to play regularly or even complete a game (Mata, Matic)
People have said he has "failed" but if their measure of "success" was to qualify for CL, then given the issues he has faced, in hindsight, that would have been some return.