Baxter
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2010
- Messages
- 11,740
One or two players who likely aren't getting a game, sticking the knife in. Much ado about nothing.
You only improve if the players want to improve. Think some are trying, especially the ones who have been given a chance by Ralf. Others do not have the attributes or intelligence to play high intensity football. You have to be a team player, not be selfish. You have to be concentrating all the time, too many switch off.
We've improved a lot IMO but thats a pointless table. I think we could be in 6th place in that table once the other teams have actually played the same number of games as us and we have played the dregs of the league. That being said, we should have won a few more games if our players weren't missing sitters and VAR wasn't being entirely useless.
Yeah. It's nice to hear though.Shaw defending Rangnick? Who would have thought...
It's debateable. I agree that the main issues are personal mistakes and shit form but also consider we've had maybe 2 and a half games of good play and creating chances and those are against poor opposition. We had very poor games, some of them we won, and games of two halfs.It's strange in that it is fairly clear that the performances are better. You keep seeing lazy pundits saying "nothing has changed", "no better than Ole", but it really is the height of ignorance. The type of people that cannot see beyond a result, it just clouds everything for them. Whereas a great manager has to understand well beyond a result.
I say that because it is clear we are creating chances. Proper chances, not just quarter chance punts from Bruno. We would go through entire games not threatening the goal pre-Rangnick and we are notably more aggressive, at least from the first whistle although we cannot presently maintain it to the standards of top sides.
But we keep shafting ourselves with brainfarts, individual mistakes, shocking conversions - and ultimately it doesn't matter what you set in place football matches also come down to moments.
It's strange in that it is fairly clear that the performances are better. You keep seeing lazy pundits saying "nothing has changed", "no better than Ole", but it really is the height of ignorance. The type of people that cannot see beyond a result, it just clouds everything for them. Whereas a great manager has to understand well beyond a result.
I say that because it is clear we are creating chances. Proper chances, not just quarter chance punts from Bruno. We would go through entire games not threatening the goal pre-Rangnick and we are notably more aggressive, at least from the first whistle although we cannot presently maintain it to the standards of top sides.
But we keep shafting ourselves with brainfarts, individual mistakes, shocking conversions - and ultimately it doesn't matter what you set in place football matches also come down to moments.
I hate these players so much.
To promote Rangnik, who is actually the current flavor, some people around here run down our players based on crap tweets.
Why do these people support this club at all?
This is what most are losing sight of, basically every player at United bar Cristiano, Sancho, Varane, De Gea and Bruno owe their United careers to Ole's support in either the decision to sign them, the patience to stand by them when they were coming up or going through a rough patch but look at how they treated him at the end with successive shameful, unprofessional displays and unkind leaks about the weakness of his management when he was at his lowest and needed them to stand by him the most. Ralf is just passing through, has been here for just a few months and they were attacking him from the word go. If anyone believes these players over Rangnick then they need to get with the program or take a look at our recent history, I don't care who will be affected but from Ralf, Ole and Mourinho I am sure if the club is interested they can get a pretty accurate list of the most unprofessional players who need weeding out.The problem is that Rangnick isn't the only one, just another one in a long line of managers the players have done this to. If they had been great for many seasons under multiple managers with barely a complaint and all of a sudden all of this starts coming out about Rangnick, you can maybe understand and think okay clearly something is up with this guy. But considering how many managers the players have downright thrown under the bus with press leaks and such I think it's fair to say Rangnick is not the problem here, whether you think he's doing a good job or not. I think what you are seeing is people supporting the club, and not supporting the player power that these players, who have had it on easy streets for multiple years now, are trying to exert.
Even media guys have had enough of these lot.
The players run themselves down with the performances they put in. You can completely disregard any of the so called leaks.To promote Rangnik, who is actually the current flavor, some people around here run down our players based on crap tweets.
Why do these people support this club at all?
No, Maguire and Shaw were pathetic for the goal. That save from long distance was impressive, it bounced at the wrong time for a 'keeper and he had a strong wrist to make sure it went away from the danger zone.The other night, surely you're not serious? He was pathetic for the goal & then made a save from a long distance shot that you'd expect any PL keeper to make. There is the bizarre narrative around him at the moment where every time he makes a save it's supposedly outstanding when in reality - like most goalkeepers by the way - 95% of his saves are regulation stops. I'm all for bigging up the outstanding saves he does make but he certainly didn't make any at Burnley.
And no, you're right he didn't have to accept the contracts put in front of him but equally, who in their right mind turns down two contracts to make you the highest paid player in your position in the world? Particularly given the second time we did so, it was evident that no other top club in the world had any need for a goalkeeper & as such was not going to pay him even close to half what we offered him?
I'm with you on not caring what the players earn but lets not pretend De Gea is any more loyal than any other player at the club. He wanted out, he didn't get out, he signed a deal with a release clause inserted, that club went another direction so he signed a contract without a release clause but with a much, much, much higher salary. It's what most of us would probably do in his situation.
I think you’ve just described football.Reading his comments about controlling the game and converting more chances worries me, as this was exactly what it was like under Van Gaal. 'Control' of the game but being highly dependent on either a clean sheet or converting more than 1 of the 3 chances created in the 90 minutes.
Reading his comments about controlling the game and converting more chances worries me, as this was exactly what it was like under Van Gaal. 'Control' of the game but being highly dependent on either a clean sheet or converting more than 1 of the 3 chances created in the 90 minutes.
I'm not sure you have been watching us the last couple of weeks if that's your take. We've created a ton of chances. It's not control for the sake of it.Reading his comments about controlling the game and converting more chances worries me, as this was exactly what it was like under Van Gaal. 'Control' of the game but being highly dependent on either a clean sheet or converting more than 1 of the 3 chances created in the 90 minutes.
I'm not sure you have been watching us the last couple of weeks if that's your take. We've created a ton of chances. It's not control for the sake of it.
Control is the name of the game.Reading his comments about controlling the game and converting more chances worries me, as this was exactly what it was like under Van Gaal. 'Control' of the game but being highly dependent on either a clean sheet or converting more than 1 of the 3 chances created in the 90 minutes.
They were pathetic for the goal, as was the goalkeeper. It was a terrible goal to concede in so many ways & the goalkeepers contribution was one of them, he was slow off his line as usual and as Rodriguez instead of making himself big he twisted his body to essentially show him where to put the ball. It is absolutely terrible goalkeeping.No, Maguire and Shaw were pathetic for the goal. That save from long distance was impressive, it bounced at the wrong time for a 'keeper and he had a strong wrist to make sure it went away from the danger zone.
Well if he wanted the Real move that bad, he'd have rejected the contract offers we put infront of him and signed for Real for free with a big signing on bonus.
The higher salary is down to the club, it's their fault it was offered. There's been countless times under Moyes, LvG, Jose and Ole were de Gea have saved us, with an inferior 'keeper we'd have been even worse off points wise.
Reading his comments about controlling the game and converting more chances worries me, as this was exactly what it was like under Van Gaal. 'Control' of the game but being highly dependent on either a clean sheet or converting more than 1 of the 3 chances created in the 90 minutes.
Those pundits/journalists aren't watching the games. They can't be. If the conclusions they've come to is that we're no better than under Ole, they're completely clueless or don't watch the games. It's a laughable statement to make.It's strange in that it is fairly clear that the performances are better. You keep seeing lazy pundits saying "nothing has changed", "no better than Ole", but it really is the height of ignorance. The type of people that cannot see beyond a result, it just clouds everything for them. Whereas a great manager has to understand well beyond a result.
I say that because it is clear we are creating chances. Proper chances, not just quarter chance punts from Bruno. We would go through entire games not threatening the goal pre-Rangnick and we are notably more aggressive, at least from the first whistle although we cannot presently maintain it to the standards of top sides.
But we keep shafting ourselves with brainfarts, individual mistakes, shocking conversions - and ultimately it doesn't matter what you set in place football matches also come down to moments.
The Wolves game is when I fully became Ole out. I was on the fence before that, but it became clear that we couldn't keep playing in this way. The result didn't matter. The performance was absolutely diabolical. We should have been well behind before we scored. Too many games were like that under Ole. We were so open, and easy to counter. Every team looked good against us.Most of this forum are incredibly outcome-orientated.
I knew we were in massive trouble this season after the Wolves game. We won that match 1-0, but I said to a friend of mine that if that's how we're going to play football this season, being that open and easy to play against, we are going to have huge problems. We should have lost that game 0-3, and Wolves find it notoriously difficult to score goals.
Conversely, lately we have drawn with Villa after being 0-2 up, been knocked out the cup by Boro and drawn with Burnley, yet I feel more optimistic than ever. In each of those games, we play very well for 70/80-minutes and suffered from blips in concentration or lack of options in key areas at key moments (I am thinking Villa, not having the option to replace Matic on the hour when his legs went). Those things can be easily fixed.
Wasnt that during Covid issue and we had to shut down our training facilities?Pretty sure Rangnick mentioned homework in the Newcastle United press conference
Only reasonable explanation since i name dropped him yesterday as one of the suspect.Clearly Reading the Cafe and want to come clean . I'm not the one who is leaking .
it is false they are angry about it, not the homeworking partPretty sure Rangnick mentioned homework in the Newcastle United press conference
Even media guys have had enough of these lot.
What will the excuses be this time? VAR? Refs? Chances missed?
Time to call a spade for a spade. He isn’t the guy.