I would argue that Rafael should be the first name on the team sheet these days.
This thread needs Glaston desperately.
'Will never be half the player that Walker is'.
Yeah I'm still trying to figure out how he went from starting in the Champions League to being seemingly cast aside for Büttner.
Ironic because he already is three times the player that Walker is?
Rafa is one of those players that people seem to ignore. He has been a rough diamond for a few years - now he is becoming polished.
It was only after the Spurs defeat that A Hanson wrote in his Telegraph column that he 'is not convinced that Rafael is Utd's long term right back solution'.
Its amazing that Rafa goes game after game putting winger after winger in his pocket but it only seems to be United fans who rate him? You would think some of the so-called experts who are paid to watch our games would have noticed his progression by now. I was listening to Talksport this morning and they mentioned Sagna was the best right back in the league. Really...?
Its amazing that Rafa goes game after game putting winger after winger in his pocket but it only seems to be United fans who rate him? You would think some of the so-called experts who are paid to watch our games would have noticed his progression by now. I was listening to Talksport this morning and they mentioned Sagna was the best right back in the league. Really...?
Arsenal players tend to get a little overrated because they have so little to gloat about in recent and not so recent years. Sagna is no exception. Despite Rafael being good in the air, Sagna is a bit better in that area. Other than that its a no brainer
That's not really the case, is it? Evra is clearly first choice at United and judging by recent seasons the playing time for the next left back in line is very limited. Makes a lot of sense to sent Fabio on loan at another PL club, and QPR seemed like a decent choice with Park going there and quite a few decent players.
He obviously need playing time to progress, so why keep him on the bench for yet another season? I think I've seen coaches at United also mentioning that spending some time a part might be good for the twins, but I might be making that up.
Its amazing that Rafa goes game after game putting winger after winger in his pocket but it only seems to be United fans who rate him? You would think some of the so-called experts who are paid to watch our games would have noticed his progression by now. I was listening to Talksport this morning and they mentioned Sagna was the best right back in the league. Really...?
Best right back in the league currently.
They just regurgitate shit they wouldn't believe if they actually watched more football.
Watched a stream from the US with Ian Darke and Macca. They seemed to recognize Rafael's rise this season.
What you've highlighted is how long it takes for some of our players to get deserved attention. I bet you if Rafael scores a few goals in some of our upcoming matches, there will be a few columns written pretending they've praised him the whole time.
This. It's the culture of English sports journalism. They're like a hive-mind, and once an idea sets in it's almost impossible to shake it without the sorts of things idiots can easily see. If he'd been shit today but scored a flukey hat-trick, he'd probably get more praise.
It's also because it's only United fans who would have watched every United game, so unless you're achieving something statistically the pundits and media mostly won't have a clue.
True, but the pundits for our games on TV and the journos who write our match-reports spout the same rubbish most of the time as well.
EDIT: But I see what you mean, few of them watch all our matches so they won't be able to spot the patterns.
It truly is strange Brightonian. Been trying to nail down where it comes from but for the life of me, I can't.
I worked for a few weeks at the Telegraph a couple of years ago. TV desk not Sports, but when I told them I knew a bit about football they let me write all the match previews for the TV section. Mostly it was fine, but only if you willingly adopted that slightly cliched style, and only used the usual catalogue of 'points of interest.' As soon as you tried to say anything out of the norm or insightful, you'd get a shake of the head from the editor and have to change it.
I remember trying to draw attention, before a United-West Ham match I think it was, to the fact that two Mexican national teamers, Hernandez and Barrera, would be coming face-to-face as new Premier League imports. Got told to just mention that Rooney hadn't scored for ages, which was the exact same line they'd taken for the past four games.
Hmm that's really interesting. Appreciate the insight mate. Just confirms my suspicions of the media here and some of them couch it under "it's what the people want" tripe.
To be fair to them, that's their job. I don't think the pattern would have developed if it didn't sell better than anything else. At the end of the day (since we're talking about cliches) the majority of fans aren't as... thoughtful... as Caftards. The straightforward/parroted opinion is the one they want and expect to hear. They don't want to read pages and pages of analysis when they could have a neatly packaged, familiar judgement instead. 'That David de Gea's a good shot-stopper, but he's been shite from crosses and set-pieces', for example.
SAF duly acknowledged his performance, alongside Evans and Smalling.
It's also because it's only United fans who would have watched every United game, so unless you're achieving something statistically the pundits and media mostly won't have a clue.