Zabaleta is a proper defender. Tough as nails.
Those two have been the best full backs in the league from what I've seen this season (which is quite a lot, I imagine I've seen all the teams at least twice).
Now, quick, before Pete barges in to try and tell me that Sagna who can't even get in the side ahead of Jenkinson () is the best.
Apologies that gets on my nerves!
There are certain words and phrases called NPI’s (you don’t want to know what it stands for) which you can only use in negative (and a few other limited) contexts. Examples range from at all to any longer to idioms like give a damn and lift a finger. In BrE, care less is an NPI.
What has happened for many AmE speakers is that care less is no longer felt as an NPI, and could care less has become an idiom in itself, meaning “don’t care”. Exactly the same thing has happened (including in BrE) in the development of phrases like He knows jack shit from He doesn’t know jack shit.
See this recent Language Log post for the history of the phrase and the disputes about it.
Just because Zabaleta tackles like crazy and injures himself twice per game doesn't mean he is brilliant at defending.
I am not saying he is poor, because he is good player, but nothing to special, Wes Brown didn't do nothing worse for us on RB few seasons before.
Plech, don't make me infract you for excruciatingly tedious posting resulting in mass suicide. You have a responsibility to keep that shit locked up where no-one else can see it but you and your alter-egos.
That's not really true though. Cantona, Ole, Evra, Vidic, Berbatov etc..
In fact ignoring the ones that came through the ranks I think Rafael and Hernandez seem to be the most thankful for the opportunity to represent the club. I hope the fans cut them some slack when they do hit a bad patch.
Destined for greatness. His first appearance he volleys beautifully with his left foot against Arsenal and doesn't even celebrate but runs to grab the ball so we can get on with the comeback.
I love that he out muscles and out jumps so many players even though he is a pretty small player.
And he scored at Anfield with his left when we were getting battered.
Future captain.
Not sure where this talk has come from. He's a brilliant player but not really captain material. He doesn't talk much on the pitch, he's a 'head down' sort of player. Plus the fullback position doesn't lend itself to captaincy. He spends all his time bombing up and down one side of the pitch, so there's no time to be marshalling the rest of the team, and he's not in a position to get a good sense of the game as a whole anyway.
Evans was the man who stood out against West Ham as future captain material, for me. He was shouting all game long, often correcting Smalling's positioning, and clearly had a really good sense of the shape of the game. Those lovely runs forward, in particular, were perfectly timed, coming at moments when the midfield was idling a little and everyone needed something to get them going.
Indeed if only Gary Neville had not played as a fullback
To me, Evans isn't captain material, and I base that on a lot more than one game. He doesn't look tough enough, and we have seen several times that he looks offset by mistakes and going through a rough patch. I'm sure that Fergie will know who will be the next captain anyhow.
Not sure where this talk has come from. He's a brilliant player but not really captain material. He doesn't talk much on the pitch, he's a 'head down' sort of player. Plus the fullback position doesn't lend itself to captaincy. He spends all his time bombing up and down one side of the pitch, so there's no time to be marshalling the rest of the team, and he's not in a position to get a good sense of the game as a whole anyway.
Evans was the man who stood out against West Ham as future captain material, for me. He was shouting all game long, often correcting Smalling's positioning, and clearly had a really good sense of the shape of the game. Those lovely runs forward, in particular, were perfectly timed, coming at moments when the midfield was idling a little and everyone needed something to get them going.
Exceptions don't disprove rules. And Neville was a very different sort of fullback to Rafael.
I see your point about Evans. I wasn't saying that I think he will be our captain in the future. It's just odd that a few people are using this game as a reason why Rafa might be, when he didn't show many signs of captain-esque potential and Evans did.
I've seen him close up in the reserves a few times in the last 3-4 years and he has been unbelievable on the right wing. The same can be said for Fabio up on the left wing, both scored and created lots of goals when they did play.
On top of that, you're layman fan and rival fans still don't like him because he is "rash" "a liability" and "not very good defensively".
It makes my blood boil when I hear that bollocks. Watch the feckin' game.
Exceptions don't disprove rules. And Neville was a very different sort of fullback to Rafael.
I see your point about Evans. I wasn't saying that I think he will be our captain in the future. It's just odd that a few people are using this game as a reason why Rafa might be, when he didn't show many signs of captain-esque potential and Evans did.
Being a shouter isn't important as a captain, but showing courage, leadership
And the will to win is. Central defenders need to talk to organise the defence, that isn't the fullbacks job.
What Rafael shows is he has a pair of bollocks, he backs down to nobody.
He has a fire in his belly that not many of our players have and
IMO it spurs the crowd and players on.
If he continues he could be 1 of our highest capped outfield players.
Not sure where this talk has come from. He's a brilliant player but not really captain material. He doesn't talk much on the pitch, he's a 'head down' sort of player. Plus the fullback position doesn't lend itself to captaincy. He spends all his time bombing up and down one side of the pitch, so there's no time to be marshalling the rest of the team, and he's not in a position to get a good sense of the game as a whole anyway.
Evans was the man who stood out against West Ham as future captain material, for me. He was shouting all game long, often correcting Smalling's positioning, and clearly had a really good sense of the shape of the game. Those lovely runs forward, in particular, were perfectly timed, coming at moments when the midfield was idling a little and everyone needed something to get them going.
Being a shouter isn't important as a captain, but showing courage, leadership
And the will to win is. Central defenders need to talk to organise the defence, that isn't the fullbacks job.
What Rafael shows is he has a pair of bollocks, he backs down to nobody.
He has a fire in his belly that not many of our players have and
IMO it spurs the crowd and players on.
If he continues he could be 1 of our highest capped outfield players.
Gone are the days where the captain on the pitch has too be a big talker. Despite Vidic's big rep he's not a huge talker, neither was Cantona. There's loads more.
Rafael is the sort that could be captain one day because he's full on and leads by example. I don't think it'll happen because I think we'll always have better options but I think when he's older there'll be plenty of times when he does captain the side if the actual captain is out etc.
He is good defender, but he definitely buys people with those heroic things.
Well, our next permanent captain would be Rooney. After him Jones, Rafael and Evans (not in that order) looks captain material so I think that it could be quit possible that one day Rafael would be our perma captain.
God..I hope not.
Despite his controversy in 2010 he seems to be the most natural choice when Vidic will be sold/retired. The only exception is if Vidic will be here for another 5-6 years and then Rooney would not be starter.
Wether Rooney becomes our next captain or not I have serious doubts that it will be Rafael so soon. I like Rafael's fire but a captain needs to be able to keep his cool a bit better.
The Tevez situation is fun and good to see some confidence in a young player not taking shit from other players, but if he were our captain in that situation then that could very well escalate things on the pitch unnecessarily.
Its not just the controversy add on to the fact that he is one of least consistent players out of all the starters. Take months to get back from any simple injury, doesnt handle pressure that well(see him badmouth the fans during the last world cup) and is not the best example to our youngsters off the pitch.
He doesn't take months to get back from any simple injury, and plenty of great captains have done some pretty odd things at world cups and off the pitch. Keane did alright..
Gary Neville's punditry is the best, but others need to raise their game
The Sky man is celebrated for his research, neutrality and controversial analysis, but this should be the general standard
Share 947
inShare11
Gary Neville commentating for Sky
Gary Neville's punditry skills have been exaggerated by the poor standard of the opposition. Photograph: Sky Sports
It requires considerable experience of watching British football coverage to understand why Gary Neville is such a celebrated pundit, for he has become universally popular for merely filling his job description. His step-by-step analysis of Stoke City's goal at West Ham last week was masterful, yet so simple – he pointed out a hand signal, a couple of blocks and a clever run. Shouldn't this be the general standard?
After all, providing insight upon a sport you've played at the highest level shouldn't be particularly challenging. Neville made his punditry debut for ITV at the 2002 World Cup, whilst sidelined with the early 21st century curse of the broken metatarsal, and the Brazil side that won the competition is a decent analogy for Neville's punditry – clearly the best, but their quality exaggerated by the poor standard of the opposition.
Neville's popularity is essentially rooted in three factors. First, he argues against the consensus. Last season, for example, when Chelsea were struggling to adapt to André Villas-Boas's high defensive line, they conceded a goal when Ashley Cole was stationed behind the rest of the Chelsea defence, playing an opponent onside. To every other pundit, and to the vast majority of television viewers, the problem was clear – Cole was in a bad position. But Neville said the opposite. Cole, he said, was the only Chelsea defender in a good position – the other three were to blame.
Second, Neville is thorough; his Monday Night Football offerings are clearly the result of meticulous research. Putting together a 15-minute sequence on the art of diving, as he did towards the end of last season, takes dedication and commitment others lack. One Sky colleague comments on how Neville treats punditry the same way he treated professional football, where he succeeded primarily through hard work and intense preparation, rather than natural talent.
Third, despite being a symbol of Manchester United, Neville appears neutral. This is actually more important when applying to individuals rather than clubs, and is in stark contrast to his colleague Jamie Redknapp, who remains determined not to criticise friends – which is particularly difficult considering he appears to be mates with, or related to, a number of key Premier League characters.
In this respect, Redknapp's fault is nothing more than being a nice man, and he's become more critical, but at the start of his television career the situation was ludicrous. When analysing England's Euro 2004 defeat to France, when England conceded a penalty courtesy of Steven Gerrard's wayward backpass and David James's clumsy challenge on Thierry Henry, Redknapp managed to blame Ashley Cole for not thumping the ball downfield. Both Gerrard and James, of course, had been Redknapp's team-mates at Liverpool. Neville has avoided such partisanship, seemingly in spite of his coaching role with England.
Pundits are frequently quizzed on areas they're not experts on (refereeing decisions, for example) and this applies more specifically to roles on the pitch, so Neville is, naturally, most engaging when discussing defending. Presenter introductions often contain "jokes" about how the punditry lineup is based heavily around one position – Gary Lineker did so when opening the BBC's Germany v Italy coverage at Euro 2012, with Gianluca Vialli, Alan Shearer and Jürgen Klinsmann alongside him. That's four world-class strikers, yet there was no specific focus on goalscoring.
Sky's Goals on Sunday does this excellently. A relaxed roundup of the previous day's action is interspersed with friendly but engaging analysis – perhaps in the knowledge that many are witnessing the goals for a second time, so the discussion takes a different slant. Often it is serving managers who appear on the show – it was David Moyes last weekend – but even players produce good insights, because they're asked about their own areas of expertise. Last season Ian Wright and Jermain Defoe appeared together, and although that lineup is hardly likely to rival Marcelo Bielsa in terms of deep football thinking, the duo were constantly asked about finishing, about movement in the box and about striking partnerships. Somewhat surprisingly, it was excellent television, and as illuminating on the subject of scoring goals as Neville is about preventing them.
Sky's La Liga coverage is also interesting, partly because of guests that have ranged from Rafael Benítez to Fabio Capello, but also because there's a focus on overall strategies – not just post-commentary on goals, but discussion upon the pattern of the game, using video examples of pressing, for example, or diagonal balls. Meanwhile, ITV's Champions League coverage deserves credit because they've created a fine partnership in Roy Keane and Lee Dixon – Keane talks primarily about attitude and team spirit, Dixon concentrates on tactical and technical aspects.
There is little to recommend in Match of the Day's analysis. In fairness, the producers are in an impossible position, forced to cater to a huge range of tastes, from those who simply want to see goals, to those who want detailed, in-depth debate about offside traps and overlapping full-backs.
When the mere running order is argued furiously across social networks, it's impossible to please the majority with the actual discussion – but the suspicion is that neither purist nor casual fan is satisfied by the current arrangement.
Match of the Day's experiment with Vincent Kompany was interesting yet ultimately fruitless in terms of analysis. The Belgian is, if anything, too statesmanlike and media-friendly for the role – he insisted that no, he wasn't remotely pleased to see his side's major title rivals lose against a side battling relegation. Michael Owen was no more illuminating – but their mere appearances were a sign that Match of the Day is seeking to evolve its coverage and use different faces. The likes of ESPN and ITV have increasingly featured journalists on round-up shows, but as Neville has shown, there is no substitute for an insightful ex-pro when talking about on-pitch matters.
Often, they're not the biggest names. The ex-Arsenal and West Ham midfielder Stewart Robson is excellent in his role as ESPN's Italian football co-commentator, delivering sharp tactical insights while the match is still in play, while the former Middlesbrough midfielder Robbie Mustoe has made a name for himself on US television. Michael Robinson, most famous at Brighton, is a key figure in Spanish television.
Occasionally, you witness a guest pundit with great intelligence – Jens Lehmann is superbly analytical (and disturbingly calm), the former Tottenham goalkeeper Erik Thorstvedt is another. When Barcelona faced Real Madrid in the Champions League last year, Eidur Gudjohnsen was wonderful when discussing the difference between Pep Guardiola and José Mourinho.
None have won as many titles as Alan Hansen or scored as many goals as Alan Shearer, but in terms of insight, they shouldn't be any less respected. The thing about ex-professionals is that they retain their competitive streak – pair Hansen with Shearer and the Scot is happy to spout cliches, but when he was alongside Dixon, he sensed competition and upped his game.
Losing Dixon was a blow, but the BBC aren't in a disastrous position. One fine appointment – someone in the mould of Gudjohnsen, perhaps – could be the catalyst for others to step up. Match of the Day remains the most prominent football show on television – it simply needs to find its Neville.
feck. That. Out of all the stupid tactical things Sir Alex has done this season this has to be the one that makes me the most mad. Take off the most consistent, most passionate player we've had all season after 30 minutes when two of the goals had nothing to do with him whatsoever.