Fully Fledged
Full Member
Exactly what they are doing now but got wet doing it.What would they have done if it had been tipping it down with rain?
Exactly what they are doing now but got wet doing it.What would they have done if it had been tipping it down with rain?
Exactly what they are doing now but got wet doing it.
Because most people these days use smart devices and streaming services to watch stuff.Why? It's on pretty much every TV channel in the UK, and as an example I used the US where it was live on pretty much every major news channel, another person gave Australia as an example where it was on four of the five main channels. Why would people watch something on YouTube they could watch on their TV (if they chose to watch it)?
Not denying a lot of people use Youtube but downplaying the viewing figures just because a select youtube channel only has 40k viewers is a bit laughable to say the least.It's not that far fetched, there's probably more mobiles and other portable devices than TV's around the world.
But would you bother if it was on the TV?Because most people these days use smart devices and streaming services to watch stuff.
This commentary adds nothing, shut the feck up.
Because most people these days use smart devices and streaming services to watch stuff.
Not if its on TV which is the point you seem to be missingBecause most people these days use smart devices and streaming services to watch stuff.
A lot of people will be watching on BBC, which is available in a lot of countries worldwide. Youtube isn't a great way to conclude how many are watching.
Not if I'm in the house no.But would you bother if it was on the TV?
Do you want Steve McMananman and Jermaine Jenas instead?
Apart from British people who watches the BBC?
According to the TV guide it's on news channels and the first TF1 and FR2 in France until 2pm UK time. Apart from a few grannies watching daytime TV there won't be many watching. Everyone's at work/school.
They'll see it on the news tonight and that's it.
Not denying a lot of people use Youtube but downplaying the viewing figures just because a select youtube channel only has 40k viewers is a bit laughable to say the least.
BBC World Service? Whenever I've gone to Asian countries the BBC and CBS are widely watched. Probably less so in the EU I imagine.
You realise Adrian Durham will be doing the commentary on Talkshite? Imagine that
Their local news might be biased with an agenda. BBC is one of the most respected and balanced medias in the world.BBC worldwide is for British people abroad. Why would people in whatever country they live in watch the BBC and not their local news channels. I can get BBC worldwide on my TV but never watch it.
BBC worldwide is for British people abroad. Why would people in whatever country they live in watch the BBC and not their local news channels. I can get BBC worldwide on my TV but never watch it.
Apart from British people who watches the BBC?
According to the TV guide it's on news channels and the first TF1 and FR2 in France until 2pm UK time. Apart from a few grannies watching daytime TV there won't be many watching. Everyone's at work/school.
They'll see it on the news tonight and that's it.
HarryWho is that absurdly tall bloke?
Because most people these days use smart devices and streaming services to watch stuff.
BBC worldwide is for British people abroad. Why would people in whatever country they live in watch the BBC and not their local news channels. I can get BBC worldwide on my TV but never watch it.
Seriously? No white text?Their local news might be biased with an agenda. BBC is one of the most respected and balanced medias in the world.
An estimated 4 billions including news bulletins.
Now even if that is a gross exaggeration by an order of magnitude, billions of people worldwide will watch at least some part of it. Including of course your President and his wife.
I’m no fan of this archaic parade, but comparing this funeral to the viewing figures of a run of the mill Fifa steamer on Twitch is hilarious.Just checked on youtube and it's 40k watching, that's like what a no mark guy streaming fifa from his basement gets on an average wednesday.
It's absurd that Andrew is part of this procession, isn't it?
Their local news might be biased with an agenda. BBC is one of the most respected and balanced medias in the world.
It will be on news bulletins of course everywhere, the same as any event happening in the world but there are certainly very few glued to watching the event live.
It will be on news bulletins of course everywhere, the same as any event happening in the world but there are certainly very few glued to watching the event live.
Seriously? No white text?
Many countries especially non western do not enjoy a free media. People tend to take that for granted.Why should the local news be biased with an agenda; against whom? The news will show a few minutes clip and that's it.
Not at all. He is the Queen grandson. And while many like you and me still feel he is a disgrace, he is still part of the close royal family.
Not at all. He is the Queen grandson. And while many like you and me still feel he is a disgrace, he is still part of the close royal family.
How do you know that?
Can't wait for this whole nonsense charade to be over. What a monumental waste of time and money.
I'm almost positive that he is actually her son, not her grandson. Also, he is a pedophile rapist.
Yes, I'm sure most people watch their phones instead of watching their TV. Why would anyone watch their 40inch+ live TV screen when they could watch their 6inch phone screen with a minutes delay?Because most people these days use smart devices and streaming services to watch stuff.
Certainly very few watching live. Do share your insight.