Protests following the killing of George Floyd

Imagine spending your time online defending policemen driving their cars through masses of people and believing to be the voice of reason.
 
In riots the Police basically have an unwinable job as no matter what they do if violence occurs they'll be seen as the aggressors so I do have some sympathy. But you only have to look through some of these videos to see that their are numerous examples of Police looking like they're enjoying the fight and escalating the situation.

As for that car video, couldn't they just reverse and take a different route?
 
So people are supporting violent behaviour that hurts innocents just because it rises more attention to the other violent problem? So endless circle of violence basically. Cool.

This world needs the meteor cleanse as soon as possible.
So you're hoping for an extinction level event because of arguments about protesting? What in the psychopathic hell.
 
You've written several posts attempting to paint yourself as a voice of reason being unfairly criticised here, but this is simple dishonest and disingenuous. Neither vehicle is in anyway blocked. They are both completely free to reverse without hinderance.

As I've said already in my first post..

This has been done to death now and I'm pretty sure my view is crystal clear. If you disagree then fine but I've offered more insight than some. I don't need to try and paint myself as anything. I'm simply giving an opinion.
 
Whilst I understand your point I'm not sure you have to be violent to highlight a problem. Extinction Rebellion have shown they could occupy and shut down cities in the UK for prolonged periods (London) and have brought the issue of climate change to the front of political debate. The vast majority of what they did was peaceful and resulted in very minor damage.

I appreciate the US is different but there are ways.
Yeah, they could take a knee when the national anthem plays, for example.
 
Im not an expert, but my understanding of the curfew law is that being on ones own porch out-of-hours is still meant to be allowed.

I do agree though that in that situation, if the police are telling you to get inside then just do it.
Especially when a phrase like ‘Light them up!’ rings out from the swarm of cops.
 
If posts like that make you a gem here, then mods go ahead and delete my account now ta.

This post was awful, but him on the whole is something else. You don’t see that level of crazy everyday. The guy once made a post that included the words (paraphrased) “If it’s possible to hire assassins on the dark web, then how is it fair that Alex Jones gets banned from YouTube”, and in that same post mentioning that debt should not exist for a country, because they can just print more money, so what are they really doing with the money to say the country is in debt?
 
So people are supporting violent behaviour that hurts innocents just because it rises more attention to the other violent problem? So endless circle of violence basically. Cool.

This world needs the meteor cleanse as soon as possible.
What a wonderful insight, you should write a book.
 
As I've said already in my first post..

This has been done to death now and I'm pretty sure my view is crystal clear. If you disagree then fine but I've offered more insight than some. I don't need to try and paint myself as anything. I'm simply giving an opinion.

That's fine.

But when you opinion is that they were blocked when the video evidence clearly shows they weren't, or when your opinion invents hypothetical emergencies that justify inexcusable actions, don't start crying when people call you out on it.

Everyone is allowed an opinion. The thing is, everyone else is allowed to disagree with it.
 
I've been pretty consistent in my views towards those who actively choose to spread the virus. Cheltenham, Bournemouth beach, this protest - all arseholes.

If there were global gatherings tomorrow that guaranteed the end of racial oppression if they hit critical mass, would you attend or self isolate?
 
In riots the Police basically have an unwinable job as no matter what they do if violence occurs they'll be seen as the aggressors so I do have some sympathy. But you only have to look through some of these videos to see that their are numerous examples of Police looking like they're enjoying the fight and escalating the situation.

As for that car video, couldn't they just reverse and take a different route?
That’s what I don’t understand the police should be a distance apart from the trouble and forming a barricade, letting the rioters exhaust themselves or rushing them when needed but they’re stuck in the middle of it spread out causing carnage.
It looks very unprofessional and causing more harm than good.
 
Not sure that will force the issue tbh.



Why? :wenger:

I want to understand why what appears to be happening in that video is good police work with tiny technical errors.

I also found a video on Twitter that highlights the mortal danger that forced the poor officer to drive into the crowd in the other incident.


See how they surround the vehicle? The driver had only split seconds before the crowd would have lynched him. Such a brave colleague.
 
In my limited knowledge on this it seems to me that this brutal murder has lit a fire that only needed a spark to set alight. From the brutality against minorities (particularly black people) to the rampant inequality, the failure of virus response and the unsupported financial and healthcare problems that come with it it seemed inevitable that America was reaching a boiling point. It's no surprise that this has come under an openly facist and uncaring government. May of these issues have existed under endless governance of both parties but perhaps this is the first time that the government has dropped all facades of caring and a wider public has woken up to reality.

I remember a speech by an Iraq veteran where he said that he realised he had more in common with the Iraqis he was sent to kill than the suits that sent him to Iraq. Now is the time for Americans of all races that have been ignored and disenfranchised by their government to unite and demand a seat at the table. I don't hope for any harm to the innocent but, as has been pointed out multiple times in this very thread, all their peaceful protests have been ignored and when a ruling class does this then history tells us that the general public will eventually choose to fight back.

No single ordinary person should be condemning these protests. Protests like this don't happen when the system works, it happens when the majority of people within a system have had enough of being ignored and treated like shit. Now is the time for people of all races to realise that they have more in common with each other than they do with the people in power and do what is needed to demand change. I can't think of one moment in history where real change didn't come from mass protest.

The real facade that is bring highlighted here is the idea of 'democracy' when the governing class represent a minority of 'important' people over the majority.

Very good post.
 
Im not an expert, but my understanding of the curfew law is that being on ones own porch out-of-hours is still meant to be allowed.

I do agree though that in that situation, if the police are telling you to get inside then just do it.

It's not about what's allowed or not allowed, it's about common sense

The man was in his porch, looking for something that doesn't happened often in his lifetime, in a very conducive condition (it's not like there's imminent threat of bombs or shooting), is that even necessary?

Again american cops loves to hide behind the what's allowed and not allowed. Yes they have that in their books that they can pinned a suspect as they see fit, but do they need to? In George's case it wasn't necessary, but they did it anyway because they can, because the law allows them to. If cops starts using their common sense like in most western countries none of this would happens. The lies isn't with the justice system, it's the human's error.
 
What incentive does black America have to maintain the status quo?



none

People mentioning social distancing in this thread....

Utter lack of understanding that almost all non-white people in America live with a Covid-esque threat every day of their lives.
 
Those who make peaceful reforms impossible make violent revolutions inevitable.

Anyone putting the blame on protesters can get to feck. The ruling class and the well off silent middle class had long ignored the plights of these people, swatting aside their grievances to protect their blissful personal comfort, grasping on the flimsiest of excuses to protect the police, a bunch of enforcers tasked with protecting their material interests at the expense of everybody else, so spare your pieties when people finally had enough and decided to burn it all down.

This will become the norms in our society until a new social and economic order is established, so it will get a lot worse with nary a chance of getting better.
 
That's fine.

But when you opinion is that they were blocked when the video evidence clearly shows they weren't, or when your opinion invents hypothetical emergencies that justify inexcusable actions, don't start crying when people call you out on it.

Everyone is allowed an opinion. The thing is, everyone else is allowed to disagree with it.

I didn't invent anything I simply made the point that there are circumstances that may require you to move through the crowd however there's no justification for doing so recklessly and at speed.

I'm not crying? I don't like being called a racist though for offering another opinion unless you think that's acceptable or me raising it as wrong constitutes "crying".

Anyway I think we are done with this now unless you want to carry on.
 
I thought it was pretty obvious what I meant however clearly not. The devil's advocate was there are certain circumstances when you simply have to get through that crowd. It may be due to the risk to yourself or the nature of the incident you are responding to. If there's no other option then you may have to go through the crowd but not at that speed and in such a reckless, careless fashion.

Not sure how that opinion makes me a racist or all of the other insults that were thrown.
Can you name a few emergencies for which it's acceptable to maim a crowd of people to get to?
 
I didn't invent anything I simply made the point that there are circumstances that may require you to move through the crowd however there's no justification for doing so recklessly and at speed.

I'm not crying? I don't like being called a racist though for offering another opinion unless you think that's acceptable or me raising it as wrong constitutes "crying".

Anyway I think we are done with this now unless you want to carry on.

Yeah I'm happy to leave it at that. I have my opinion of what you were trying to do with your original post and you're welcome to your opinion of me.
 
Can you name a few emergencies for which it's acceptable to maim a crowd of people to get to?

I think it's pretty obvious we are going around in circles with this. I'll repeat myself again though if it helps; there's no justification for driving through the crowd at that speed however there are circumstances which may mean going through the crowd in the car at a low steady speed is necessary. If you disagree then fine but it's been discussed plenty on the past few pages and it's de-railing the thread now.
 
It’s like the appeasement policy when it came to Hitler. Sometimes lives have to be lost, people have to martyr themselves for the greater good of society and personally I hope these protests become more radical and lead to real change in the cultural mindset of the US.
Yep, can’t say I disagree with that notion. Whatever needs to happen to force change, should happen now. And any of the injury, death and damages suffered now would not be in vain.

Killing them “with kindness” in the hope of change, is wishful thinking.
 
Yeah I'm happy to leave it at that. I have my opinion of what you were trying to do with your original post and you're welcome to your opinion of me.

I don't have any opinion of you as unlike many on here I don't jump to conclusions or try to assassinate someone's character without trying to engage and understand their point fully beforehand.
 
Even the tanks in that infamous picture didn’t run the guy over
The tank drivers were being screamed at through their headset from their higher ups to run the protester over, but cooler heads thankfully prevailed.

Pretty sure the protester was picked up by authorities soon after his run in with the tanks.
 
The tank drivers were being screamed at through their headset from their higher ups to run the protester over, but cooler heads thankfully prevailed.

Pretty sure the protester was picked up by authorities soon after his run in with the tanks.

Yeah they escorted him away and to this day no one knows his identity. Actually very interesting.
 
So people are supporting violent behaviour that hurts innocents just because it rises more attention to the other violent problem? So endless circle of violence basically. Cool.

This world needs the meteor cleanse as soon as possible.

Do you actively practice your ignorance, so you can keep it topped up for all the discussions on here you clearly don't understand yet want to weigh in on?
 
So people are supporting violent behaviour that hurts innocents just because it rises more attention to the other violent problem? So endless circle of violence basically. Cool.

This world needs the meteor cleanse as soon as possible.
Agree. I have seen a video where 10-15 people are beating shopkeeper's wife while he is helpless to protect her. I bet that he is happy with "helping the cause".
 
An other thing, people shouldn't face a crowd and swing a sword or use a bow. It's pure madness, people have lived in such comfort that they don't realize how dangerous a crowd can be, your acts of violence will be infinitely multiplied and there is a fair chance to be killed. This applies to police officers too, we have all seen some of them isolate themselves and seemingly believing that they are super heros, if the crowd turn on them they are dead. A shop can be fixed but you are not going to be resurrected.

I say that in particular for swordman, I don't know what exactly happened beforehand but swinging a sword is incredibly stupid in that type of context, it's not a movie you are vulnerable.
 
Do you actively practice your ignorance, so you can keep it topped up for all the discussions on here you clearly don't understand yet want to weigh in on?

So you are one of the "violence supporters" too eh? Makes sense I guess.

Agree. I have seen a video where 10-15 people are beating shopkeeper's wife while he is helpless to protect her. I bet that he is happy with "helping the cause".

Yep, it's all for the good cause! Yay!
 
I don't understand why all these mayors, governors and people in power have not given any speeches or addresses directly to all the police authorities and pigs who caused the problem in the first place. That Chauvin guy already had 18 citations against him. Minneapolis police have a long history of mistreatment yet it's taken a mobile phone video to make the world take notice.

They should arrest those 3 other pigs, direct their comments towards the police authorities and actually do something. Those cities would not be burning right now if Floyd was alive today. They will rebuild those properties but you can't bring all those dead black people back.

I don't blame what's going on now. It's the coppers' mess and they need to clean it up. Justice will stop the violence. It's not rocket science. They would do well to stop shifting the blame onto the protestors because they're going to look very stupid if those four pigs get away with anything less than long custodial sentences.
 
Agree. I have seen a video where 10-15 people are beating shopkeeper's wife while he is helpless to protect her. I bet that he is happy with "helping the cause".

Where have you seen this video?
 
It's not about what's allowed or not allowed, it's about common sense

The man was in his porch, looking for something that doesn't happened often in his lifetime, in a very conducive condition (it's not like there's imminent threat of bombs or shooting), is that even necessary?

Again american cops loves to hide behind the what's allowed and not allowed. Yes they have that in their books that they can pinned a suspect as they see fit, but do they need to? In George's case it wasn't necessary, but they did it anyway because they can, because the law allows them to. If cops starts using their common sense like in most western countries none of this would happens. The lies isn't with the justice system, it's the human's error.

I agree with pretty much all of that.
 
I don't have any opinion of you as unlike many on here I don't jump to conclusions or try to assassinate someone's character without trying to engage and understand their point fully beforehand.

Well that's nonsense. You clearly think I'm a simpleton incapable of engaging with, or understanding your intellectual heavyweight of a point.

You set up a straw man argument and embellished it multiple times by dishonestly claiming that the cars were blocked, suggesting that the officers inside somehow had no other choice remaining to them.

Playing the victim doesn't change that. I wasn't lying when I said I'm happy to leave this but I'm also not going to give you the satisfaction of a smug last word. You were wrong and still are.