Ainu
Full Member
Well yes, that's true, but that's not what you said. Eiter way, as I said the worst part of it was the foul he gave.it works, however, the ref deems it.
Well yes, that's true, but that's not what you said. Eiter way, as I said the worst part of it was the foul he gave.it works, however, the ref deems it.
Mike Dean can feck off.
Red card looked correct to me. He went running to the crowd which caused it to kick off and police had to eject supporters.
Not enough time wasting to warrant that much time being added on.Time wasting adds on time. Not to mention their players going down for treatment every ten minutes. When we entered the five injury time minutes, there was more time wasting and 'injuries', plus Pep and Eddie were talking to the ref. Not hard to find those minutes lads.
Sterling 2-1
The problem is that it is so illogical and inconsistent. There is literally no way that you can determine what length of added time they will come up with.
It is basically what the referees feel like on the day.
Fuming. Why are City allowed to play until the 97th minute when it's 5 mins added on. I've seen so much when we've played that it doesn't matter if the rival team are on the floor the whole time, the time ends when the time ends!
Ridiculous.
but does the ref also account for extra stoppages after 90 mins, within his allotted stoppage time? Whats the ruling on that?The 5 was to start after 90 in fairness.
Bournemouth were doing a lot of time wasting break up the play tactics though.
Examples of mistakes are indicative of ham having a good game
We always used to do it under Sir Alex. Never say die attitude. Just fecking annoying when you're not the team doing it.
That said, we win in style nowadays.
5 mins of stoppage time, yet the goal was scored in the 7th minute of stoppage time???
Dean must of had them in his Sat accum!The match wasn't going to end until City score.
I don't have any issue with the stoppage time allotted or how Dean applied it.Well yes, that's true, but that's not what you said. Eiter way, as I said the worst part of it was the foul he gave.
No question. I know people think it's ridiculous to get booked for celebrating but the stewards shouldn't have to deal with that.Red card looked correct to me. He went running to the crowd which caused it to kick off and police had to eject supporters.
No problem with the sending off. It could have been dangerous. Sterling is brainless.Sterling was already booked. His celebration warranted him a second yellow which was completely the right decision by Mike Dean.
Unbeaten start including 2 away wins says otherwise. City under Pep are doomed to succeed.No chance of top 4 playing like they have last couple of games.
Dean didn't have a great game overall but the added time thing was fair. Bournemouth were time wasting constantly.
The stoppage didn't start until 91, due to the ref having to speak to managers.
That said, even so, it should have been blown at around 96.
The refs an arse hole. Simple as that!
Joke of a match tbh. City are a dirty side aren't they? So many sly kicks and fouls they seem to get away with. Not to mention the constant whinging and diving.
Harsh but correct according to Clattenburg.Arguably shouldn't have had the time to score but the red card was harsh. No arguments with him being shite though.
This is how it felt when you were still managed by Ferguson, that fecking 1-2mins extra always..eughhh
If there's blatant time wasting then yes, he has the discretion to add it on. The five minutes didn't start till at least 2 mins were gone with Bournemouth wasting time, then all the celebrating in the crowdbut does the ref also account for extra stoppages after 90 mins, within his allotted stoppage time? Whats the ruling on that?
Exactly the same for meI feel depressed. We better win today or the day is ruined for me.