Nero
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2008
- Messages
- 3,420
Not sure how going for the ball acts as a defence. His boot when into Ederson's face at head height. It was dangerous and reckless so it's a red card. Intent doesn't matter.
Straight boot into the face. Of course it's a red, for feck sake.
Not a red?
Not a red?
Someone who should have come on instead of Bravo?Who the feck buys/wears a goalkeeper jersey to a match?
Reckless and dangerous overrules unintentional.It's not intentional. Both players have to go for the ball or the game would become completely non contact. Should be a yellow card or nothing.
Doesn't chanfe the fact is the red card. Most of them happen when players go for the ball what are you on.He's got to go for the ball there, most strikers would.
This. Clearly not intentional by Many, but very clumsy and dangerous. Clear red card.Thats a red. Dangerous from Mane.
Not sure how anyone can complain.
It looked like his leg missed and he only body slammed him.Specsavers for you mate.
He told Mane to kick Ederson in the face.What did he do?
Not a red?
Not a red?
Who the feck buys/wears a goalkeeper jersey to a match?
OK I initially said never a red card but I've had to make a U turn after seeing the replay again.
If a stud up challenge to the legs is a straight red, how the feck is one to the skull not a red? What the actual feck is Gary Neville and the commentating team on about?!