wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 39,047
City with no real cutting edge in attack today without Foden/Haaland on there.
You know it’s going to happen, we’ll play the game of the season
I really dislike this Arsenal team, and Arteta especially. City winning is just meh. Doesn’t mean much to me - it’s almost like no one is winning it. Also, I’ve never met a Man City fan in my life. They didn’t exist where I grew up.
There's plenty up here, starting coming out of the woodwork once they started winning stuff.I really dislike this Arsenal team, and Arteta especially. City winning is just meh. Doesn’t mean much to me - it’s almost like no one is winning it. Also, I’ve never met a Man City fan in my life. They didn’t exist where I grew up.
Feck me people are really saying that Boly threw his head onto Edersons fists…
Ederson went flying with his fists the same way Onana did.
As most of us said yesterday, those are rarely given and today is a prime example
Arsenal fans have won nothing for 20 years and their fans are still everywhere. Genuinely is the most unbearable fanbase.There's plenty up here, starting coming out of the woodwork once they started winning stuff.
Feck me people are really saying that Boly threw his head onto Edersons fists…
Ederson went flying with his fists the same way Onana did.
As most of us said yesterday, those are rarely given and today is a prime example
Those are similar: fists flying to the head of an opponent. Yesterday the player was also playing the ballNot in the slightest bit similar. It's laughable people are claiming these two incidents are the same.
Yesterday they goalkeepers weren’t allowed to do it thoughThe difference is the height of the challenge. Ederson can reasonably expect to be twatting someone in the ribs rather than the head at that height, and goalkeepers are allowed to do that. They just are.
How do people prefer City to win the league over Arsenal. It's just so fecking boring to have them win it again.
Yesterday they goalkeepers weren’t allowed to do it though
I can understand refs being inconsistent but it’s baffling that people can say Onana and Ederson were different situations
Nevermind.City's arses getting a little twitchy?
Those are similar: fists flying to the head of an opponent. Yesterday the player was also playing the ball
Except you didn’tBut I just told you the difference?
Same here, watching something elseNevermind.
Boring, joyless robotic cnuts.
Except you didn’t
The difference is the height of the challenge. Ederson can reasonably expect to be twatting someone in the ribs rather than the head at that height, and goalkeepers are allowed to do that. They just are.
I do take a narrow view, because fists to the head = dangerous play = penalty.Yes if you take an extremely narrow view to feed your sense of injustice, of course.
Yesterday AWB and an attacker where challenging for the ball and Onana comes flying in and connects with the attacker after the ball was gone. He was nowhere near the ball.
Here Ederson is jumping out to make an attempt to clear the ball and the attacker is jumping towards goal with the same thing in mind. As Ederson comes out the attacker comes in from the side and they collide with each other. It's a 50/50. You couldn't make a good case that either player is at fault for the collision. Whereas yesterday it was all on Onana.
No idea what game you’re watching. Ederson fouled him there, based on the incident we saw yesterday.Yes if you take an extremely narrow view to feed your sense of injustice, of course.
Yesterday AWB and an attacker where challenging for the ball and Onana comes flying in and connects with the attacker after the ball was gone. He was nowhere near the ball.
Here Ederson is jumping out to make an attempt to clear the ball and the attacker is jumping towards goal with the same thing in mind. As Ederson comes out the attacker comes in from the side and they collide with each other. It's a 50/50. You couldn't make a good case that either player is at fault for the collision. Whereas yesterday it was all on Onana.
At a time it wasn't as clear cut as it turned out to be later in their careersIt's not between grown adults, but did you argue objectively in primary school?