I am late twenties, work in London at a prestigious investment bank, and have a first class honours degree. I have followed PL football since 1997 and was in the stands in Wembley as a young lad when we beat Newcastle to win the FA Cup, which was the second leg of the Treble. Please do not condescend me. It's unnecessary.
As for your comments about my criticism of Chelsea's playing style, it is not true that they have always been a reactive, boring side. The first Mourinho team played some absolute end to end stuff. The Ancelotti double winning team won by playing free flowing football and broke the points record, and won the title in style with multiple 6-0 and 7-0 wins. In the title clinching game they won 8-0 and their attacking trio consisted of Drogba, Malouda and Anelka, who player for player have less quality than the trio of Costa, Hazard and Willian. So your statement isn't necessarily true.
As for your reference to the "Ferguson 1-0 sides", Man United played attacking end to end football for the majority of his reign at the club. It was a common refrain at the time amongst United fans that we didn't mind conceding 3 goals as long as we scored 4. We had multiple high scoring games almost every season and it was certainly not a defensive team renowned for grinding out 1-0 results. So I have no idea what you're talking about when you refer to Fergie as a 1-0 manager. In fact there are some similarities between his playing style and the current Liverpool playing style except he won, and he didn't cause his players to be exhausted. Instead he rotated well, and he instilled in the players tremendous mental resilience by creating a siege mentality. The exact same thing Mourinho is renowned for today.
The ultimate team for grinding out 1-0 wins was George Graham's Arsenal but maybe you're too young to remember that team.