Majima
Full Member
Sounds like it's been formed in their image then. I thought Stoke fans were bad... must be something in the water.Wolves are such a shithouse team. They just have a few good players to edge games for them here and there.
Sounds like it's been formed in their image then. I thought Stoke fans were bad... must be something in the water.Wolves are such a shithouse team. They just have a few good players to edge games for them here and there.
This. If i am attacker i would always go down in those situation. You touched me and because of that i lost momentum. feck you, i am going downthe problem is this behavior is incentivized by the refs. If he had not gone down there and tried to recover the ball, the penalty wouldn't have been given either by the ref or VAR. We've seen this for many years now.
Typical, luck all in favour for Liverpool once more.No, he just misses the game on Sunday. Apt username though![]()
It's no coincidence IMO that they have drawn the most games this season. It's either a big lumped balls upfront of giving it Adama to run withSounds like it's been formed in their image then. I thought Stoke fans were bad... must be something in the water.
Not sure how that's lucky for Liverpool. Surely it would be luckier if he was out for longer than just one match?Typical, luck all in favour for Liverpool once more.
Quite clearly had his foot stood on. Are you Jim Beglin?Mendy with both arms around Dendoncker in the box, not even looking at the ball.
VAR: That's perfectly ok.
Mahrez dives to the ground after being brushed.
VAR: PENALTY.
It’s absolutely incredible, isn’t it?Typical, luck all in favour for Liverpool once more.
Jim Beglin posting on here during the game would explain why he misses so much of the action on the pitchQuite clearly had his foot stood on. Are you Jim Beglin?
It really is long ball one after another. They're a shocking football team.It's no coincidence IMO that they have drawn the most games this season. It's either a big lumped balls upfront of giving it Adama to run with
Maybe.Quite clearly had his foot stood on. Are you Jim Beglin?
No. I want the same thing. Plus Wolves have been pissing me off.Is it wrong I want City to win? Wolves are more of a threat to us than City.
So, you're saying the encroachment call was incorrect?Maybe.
Mahrez' reaction was so exaggerated though, can't see that being given outside the box. And then the encroachment issue - let's not even go there. Might as well keep giving City penalties until they score.
The defender encroached and cleared the ball. I'm not sure what VAR got wrong hereMaybe.
Mahrez' reaction was so exaggerated though, can't see that being given outside the box. And then the encroachment issue - let's not even go there. Might as well keep giving City penalties until they score.
Wouldn't go that far.City is playing like Wolve and Wolve is playing like City
Which City? Bristol?City is playing like Wolve and Wolve is playing like City
You're not in Mahrez's head so you can't just assume he wasn't impeded enough. Mahrez beat the defender and he stood on his foot from behind = foul.Contact doesn't automatically mean foul, that's why there's nuance in contact. To me it was soft AF, and I wouldn't have given it.
Similarly trivial 'fouls' don't get given as penalties week in, week out.Quite clearly had his foot stood on. Are you Jim Beglin?
That doesn't make this one not a foul.Similarly trivial 'fouls' don't get given as penalties week in, week out.
He's supposed to have improved, but i don't see it, he's still as clueless as ever. He's in the wrong sport.traore still has awful decisions making
Literally only in the team for his pace
Did you think Albrighton's foul on Mane was a pen?You're not in Mahrez's head so you can't just assume he wasn't impeded enough. Mahrez beat the defender and he stood on his foot from behind = foul.
You should ignore his theatrics. That's only to draw attention to the ref he was fouled. They wouldn't have given it if he stayed on his feet, which is wrong and why it happens.
You can mute it mate. He'll basically say that Wolves have to score two to win the game. He's an expert at this dont you knowOh great, now I have to sit and look at Michael Owen's smug cnut face for 15 minutes.
Because it was a foul.How are people even debating that it’s a penalty?
I can't mute his face though. I can't find the remoteYou can mute it mate. He'll basically say that Wolves have to score two to win the game. He's an expert at this dont you know
Just thinking that.Roberto Martinez, what a blockhead.![]()
I agree!Because it was a foul.