This is why I think Koopmeiners or someone like him (a more proven version) is what we need. Asides from doing all that he can also help us creatively when one of Pogba or Bruno are down.
And it’s also the reason I believe someone of that skill set will have more joy in our side.
I just think a consistent passing line breaker will find Bruno and Pogba more than a dribbling line breaker and so against the smaller sides which we play 90% of the time there will be a bigger benefit.
Against the bigger teams as long as that player is mobile enough to position well and delay an attacking side they’ll do well too or you just play a defensive double pivot which Koop could easily do.
A more proven version of Koop would be lovely but I don’t see any such player available on the market.
You're all basing this on an assumption that Ole wants to play the same way as he Molde. We don't know that, some managers change their style but surely Ole must have implemented the style he wants after one and half years. Transfer windows are there to give him the chance to fix the cracks in it.
It’s a very big assumption especially when Ole himself has said and suggested we are a counter attacking side these are all his quotes:
When asked about him preferring a counter attacking style of play
“That's always been the way I like to play football.
Get the ball up in the opposition's half as soon as you can, as quickly as you can. If you score, fantastic. If not then you've got to have patient build-up play. But attack quickly.”
"I am always going to be demanding that when we’ve got the ball, we will try to make the most of it.
Pass forward, run forward, and be that type of football team,"
"But
I always believe in forward passes, penetrative passes, wide play, getting crosses in the box. Pass and move, pass and run, play and run forward.
Every player I’ve had if you ask them will tell you the same, that it’s about passing forward, running forward.'
It's so easy to see he wants fast progressive passers on the counter.
We do press more than we did under Mourinho but our average ball recovery is 59.38m away from the opponents goal under Ole compared to 62.24m. So we average a 2.86m higher ball recovery (Old Trafford is 105m long so basically we're pressing 2.72% higher up the pitch). Now I don't know about you but I'm pretty sure most professional athletes can cover that extra 2.86m difference.
First of all when someone brings Henderson into the argument who is generally deployed higher up the pitch and points to his passing being better than a player that has carried out defensive duties in several roles and has been used as a man marker. Then we have to look at pass percentage/completion and Zakaria wins. And then when that is proven incorrect, the back track takes effect and we hear 'oh but he's a better passer because he plays a more expansive passing game' and you conveniently forget or are completely oblivious to how Rose likes his team to play a short passing game in midfield which Zakaria is superb at. That's why the eye test trumps a spreadsheet.
Fabinho has more time on the ball at Liverpool than Zakaria has at Gladbach and if you believe otherwise then you're being dishonest and don't watch Gladbach. That statement i'm sorry is BS and most German posters would agree i'm sure. Let's not make stuff up if you aren't familliar with the league.
I never made the claim that Zakaria was a better passer than Fabinho but rather there was no significant advantage either way. Not sure why you keep asking for proof on a claim I never made..
A spreadsheet isn't evidence, you've rarely watched the player play which is more than evident in your posts..
All these teams are as good as Spurs or even better-Leverkusen, Gladbach, Leipzig, and all 3 could more than match anything outside of City and Liverpool. The German league is a very tough league and especially tough for defensive players due to the high risk factor involved. It's easier to play DM in the current Liverpool team in the EPL than it is at Gladbach where there's several teams who are superior in the competition which is a fact.
So lets assume we throw stats out the window. I believe based on the eye test Fabinho is a better passer. Prove me wrong. You can't.
You're argument so far has been to ask for stats, then when they disprove your point to remove them from the equation. You basically don't like that you are wrong on one point and can't admit it. It's funny.
Fabinho does not have more time on the ball in the PL than Zakaria, if this is your eye test go to specsavers. If you truly believe this. Prove it. Show me the average time Zakaria has on the ball compared to Fabinho. If you believe otherwise then you're being dishonest and don't watch Liverpool. Your statements are also BS as you have not evidence or backed up a single one of them. All of my points have been evidence based.
I am not using a spreadsheet I am using a recognised database for these stats. You're not criticising my analysis here you are criticising stats from globally recognised sources. By doing so you remove any ability to say Zakaria can be compared with anyone and that essentially your word is gospel. Jesus that's a bad position to be trying to defend.
I have watched Zakaria (12) , Partey (7), Rice (14), Ndidi (16) and Koopmeiners (19) matches this season he is one of 5 options I have done my homework on. I do not claim to have performed the full eye test on any other players for DM. I think that along with stats, is a good enough match basis to get a feel for Borussia Mon and their playstyle along with Zakaria and his playstyle and I stand by the fact he is a progressive dribbler more than he is a line breaking passer. It's his tendancy. If there is any player of those I mentioned you want to claim I haven't seen Partey is the one to pick which is also why you see me contribute less to discussions about him.
The German league affords attacking players more time and space than the PL does as a result not of just attacking play but of inferior defensive play too. It is harder to be an excellent defender in the PL than Bundesliga because the standard is higher in the PL.
It's far harder to be a good enough DM to play for Liverpool in the first place. Fabinho literally has to be world class to win the Champions League and PL and perform at his top level week in week out. The demands are so much higher in terms of pace in the PL that every Bundesliga graduate mentions the need to adapt in their interviews!
So criticising someone for getting to the top level of football, winning the PL and Champions league and helping them become the best in world football is a stupid argument to try and make. Fabinho is better than Zakaria and you know you can't prove otherwise as you have nothing stats wise to back you up. So you try to change the rules of engagement.
Honestly it's posts like this filled with unsubstantiated claims that get on my nerves. If you have an opinion and want to call someone out on theirs back yours up because sometimes you're opinion is less supported or in this case, completely unfounded in any evidence basis as you have consistently failed to show anything in support of this assertion.
I don't believe he will change because he's spoke openly about admiring Klopp's style. He has spoken about wanting to play a high line and wants his fullbacks to push forward but we don't have the players to play that style yet.
Sean Dyche has admired Klopp's style. Does that mean Burnley strive to be like Liverpool?
Show me the quotes of Ole saying he wants to play like Monchengladbach or like Liverpool?
You know AWB and Shaw pushed up a lot in our games recently with Matic at DM. They are our main providers of with as both Greenwood and Rashford cut inside to perform offensive actions including crossing. We already play this style with Matic, Bruno and Pogba and the addition of Sancho will only make it easier.