MDFC Manager
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 25,849
Lost because of wierd decisions. Once again.
well. if it had been an outfield player it would have been a penalty: I thought you weren't allowed to follow through anymoreEdersons tackle was as clean as they come, sadly.
Would knowing this piece of information make us any better?
Keeping Haaland quiet isn't an achievement, he's rarely involved in build-up a lot. Remember he missed a sitter right on HT.We also kept two of the best players in the PL quite for the best part of 90 minutes: de bruyne and halaand
Expecting Ten Hag to say we played well and we're unlucky
I actually don't think that's the case this week. Last week? DefinitelyNo.
We lost because we are nothing like good enough to compete with our neighbours.
But what I dislike more than that is that we just look physically weak.
Weak in the tackle.
Weak mentally.
You need to go and get your eyes tested, Rashford felt a slight touch and flopped down, he was looking for it instead of trying to score, and Ederson made a perfectly timed tackle on Garnacho, one that any CB would have been proud ofAm I being unreasonable but I think it’s a foul on Rashford by Walker and also a foul by Ederson on Garnacho. If I’m wrong, tell me why.
Am I being unreasonable but I think it’s a foul on Rashford by Walker and also a foul by Ederson on Garnacho. If I’m wrong, tell me why.
we were played off the park. if both teams took their chances we might score 3 and concede 10Paid the price for wasted chances in the first half:
- Garnacho should have squared to Rashford after 5mins
- Rashford should have controlled his big chance after the goal, you’d have favoured him in a 1-on-1
- Rashford at the far post after McT missed the ball. He could either have shot, or squared to Bruno who was unmarked on the penalty spot
well, if we hadn't he'd have had three againKeeping Haaland quiet isn't an achievement, he's rarely involved in build-up a lot. Remember he missed a sitter right on HT.
I'm just pointing out that suggesting they and us have spent the same is not reality.
They are much better than us, we were never, ever going to win that game.
But there is a reason they are much better than us and everyone else. 115 charges, and that is the tip of the iceberg.
'these big games'... although that has been the usual story lately, didn't luton have 20 odd shots as well ? its nearly every game, because we are the worst united team in 40 yearsWe only had 2 shots.
City had 27. Sigh. These big games show the complete gulf in class, hard pill to swallow.
well. if it had been an outfield player it would have been a penalty: I thought you weren't allowed to follow through anymore
If it had finished 2-1 I'd be far less annoyed then I am.
That third goal just compounded how fecking dumb all of our players were being on the ball though.
ManCity were better team. No question about that. But two important decision didn't go our way. I mean potentially freekick and penalty which instead resulted in two goals against us.No.
We lost because we are nothing like good enough to compete with our neighbours.
But what I dislike more than that is that we just look physically weak.
Weak in the tackle.
Weak mentally.
'these big games'... although that has been the usual story lately, didn't luton have 20 odd shots as well ? its nearly every game, because we are the worst united team in 40 years
You mean if they incorrectly went our way, we may have burgled a win?ManCity were better team. No question about that. But two important decision didn't go our way. I mean potentially freekick and penalty which instead resulted in two goals against us.
The gulf in class is soul wrenching. Other than the great goal, we were toyed withWe only had 2 shots.
City had 27. Sigh. These big games show the complete gulf in class, hard pill to swallow.
Andy Madley