Agreed. But again, I think it will be his next appointment that determines whether that happens.
Obviously if we dont quality for the CL this season then the football side WILL have affected the bottom line. But my guess is that, as I said, Van Gaal would carry the can for that, not Woodward. He would be expected to get the next decision right, if he didnt that would establish the pattern of incompetence, as far as the football side goes.
It is an interesting question as to whether Woodward would accept a sideways move, given it would in truth be a downward move, as he is effectively the CEO, in practice if not in title. The risk for the Glazers would be that he would feel demoted and insulted and would leave, thus killing the golden goose.
This is why the DoF route might appeal. I am interested in this question, in that I read a lot of stuff on here from people who understand the implications of it much better than I do - arguing on both sides of it. I havent got anything to add in terms of whether it is a good idea or not. But it would have the advantage of putting a football man in a position of authority in football matters, while keeping them very clearly below Woodward in the hierarchy. So Woodward remains de facto CEO, with ultimate responsibility for everything, including the football. But someone else gets to make the actual decisions, all he has to do is go along with it.