Successful
Owes the Caf £25 (With interests)
Price of 100m euro is not correct. Today his value is closer to 30m euro.
I agree. Think there are a lot of better midfielders out there.why ? If they want to pay that amount for him , let them do it.
I think Pogba is well over hyped.
I think I would have a go at that price, despite thinking he is over rated.Price of 100m euro is not correct. Today his value is closer to 30m euro.
Price of 100m euro is not correct. Today his value is closer to 30m euro.
I think I would have a go at that price, despite thinking he is over rated.
What's the difference to earlier decades? I personally think some of these rivalries are actually weird media creations and didn't really exist to the same extent in previous decades. I mean, Denis Law played for City before going to Torino and a year later moving to United, then eventually returned to City. What's the big difference to Pogba's potential move to City today? Dortmund for example doesn't have a real rivalry with Bayern and one of Dortmund's biggest legends is actually a legend for both Schalke and Dortmund despite their fierce rivalry. Reinhard Libuda played 5 years for Schalke, moved to Dortmund for 3 years and scored the goal against Liverpool in the cup winner's cup final win in the late 60's before going back to Schalke, his true love.
Pirlo played for Inter, Milan and Juve, is he just a mercenary who didn't care for his clubs or fans? I think people create some weird standards for modern players that never existed before, but still defend these standards with the 'football was better in the good old days' argument. I don't buy it.
Price of 100m euro is not correct. Today his value is closer to 30m euro.
So you think Schneiderlin is worth about £10m more than Pogba?Price of 100m euro is not correct. Today his value is closer to 30m euro.
So you think Schneiderlin is worth about £10m more than Pogba?
No, I think Schneiderlin is worth about €15m.
As ravi says, you're living in the past. Especially when it comes to United.No, I think Schneiderlin is worth about €15m.
Nobody is gonna offer €100M for him. Maybe PSG, but I can't see anyone else doing it.
I think City will go for Gundongan in the summer, superior player, cheaper and Guardiola should know him well after 3 years in Germany.
Unless real / Barca get involvedThis is nailed on IMO.
feck he's good. The move he makes at about 82,83 mins on the sideline to retain the ball is phenomenal.
Criminal that we let him slip.
feck he's good. The move he makes at about 82,83 mins on the sideline to retain the ball is phenomenal.
Criminal that we let him slip.
he's great one on one and on the ball. about 30-40 million great. not 100. it looks like Bale is going to get sold. now that's a far more exciting prospect in my book.
It makes sense. It's what Real Madrid does. For example, they bought Ronaldo for a big amount of money. But they started recovering the money with shirt sales, also they will sell him for 50m+Pogba seems to lack hunger and so, even with all his skill, the price seems insane, but it would actually be a good signing.
First of all, he turns 23 in March. So, if you get him for 5 years and sell him at 28, you might not even lose a penny with transfer fees probably not slowing down anytime soon.
Second, you don't end up with the opportunity cost of buying someone like Anderson or Fellaini for about 1/3rd the cost and letting them futz around for 3-4 seasons providing little.
Third, he'd perfectly fit our front 6, which currently has the following likely starters over the next few seasons:
---------------Martial------------
Memphis--Herrera--CM----RW
-----------Schneiderlin---------
Get Pogba and a star at RW and we can probably get by with our promising youth and a couple not so expensive depth signings at striker and CM that selling Fellaini and Rooney should pay for just fine.
To follow Conte to Chelsea?
... The fees are ridiculous for every player now, so whether it be 100 or 120 it's the going rate, as mad as that sounds....
It will be very soon.100 - 120 million euros is not "the going rate". To think that it is, not only sounds mad, it actually IS mad.
You could get better players - Veratti, Gundogan - for less.
€100m sounds about right for a player his age, profile and ability in today's market. Martial's final fee could quite easily and will most probably reach €80m (anyone disagreeing, please search up the leaked contract for the deal). I'd argue that Pogba is more proven currently and already has a lot more experience. If we get the chance to buy him, then we should go for it, he would be the perfect player to build our midfield around. Rentao Sanches is reportedly going for €60m or around that mark to us, why is Pogba's fee so overpriced in comparison?
It was a huge mistake to allow him to leave but it's one that we can rectify. I don't see many other players better suited to the premier league, especially not at his age.
It will be very soon.
Bale for 80 odd would have been seen as madness only 4 years ago.
When the TV money kicks in in July watch the prices go mad again.
If it's the "going rate" - or if it will be in the summer - then how come so many very talented players can be signed for a fraction of the 100 - 120m euros range? FFS ... the entire Spurs first XI hasn't cost much more than that.
You cite Bale, but Bale was a much more exceptional talent than Pogba has shown to be so far. Any club that spends 120m euros on Pogba will have far more money than sense.
There is a shortage of talent and the PL is awash with money.
As of next season, PL teams are going to see huge increases in their revenues.
This will be reflected in transfer fees, which would already see a player of Pogba''s profile go for 100m Euros.
I expect to see Pogba at either City, Chelsea or Real next season.
It really is mad. 100m is still a huge risk. Basically i would say only players that are almost guaranteed to not just be a success but also be consistent match winners are worth that much. Suarez was a great investment at 65m. He had already proven to be a match winner time and again carrying Liverpool for seasons. There was very little doubt he would be a hit. You could say the same about Bale. Neymar for me was a big risk as he had not played in Europe. He turned out to be a great purchase but Barcelona would have really felt the financial pain had he flopped. Ronaldo is Ronaldo, worth every penny. It's still a huge risk paying big sums like that even with the 50% increase in tv money. If the player does not measure upto expectations that is a lot of money down the toilet.100 - 120 million euros is not "the going rate". To think that it is, not only sounds mad, it actually IS mad.