Wing Attack Plan R
Full Member
OK, you choose not to answer because you know your response was way out of proportion. Done.Weird response.
OK, you choose not to answer because you know your response was way out of proportion. Done.Weird response.
The club is not a charity.We extended his contract last time as a way to stick by him as he tried to recover from his terrible injury. Not the best thing to do in a financial sense but a nice touch nonetheless.
The club would really turn into a heartless franchise if some of you had your way.
The money we've wasted on this guy is insane. He's made some of the easiest money in the world. I wonder how much time he's even trained.Imagine feeling sorry for players who get paid more in a week than most working class people get paid in a year.
Like every top level cutthroat business, if you’re not performing you get the boot. The fact of the matter is we’ve been accommodating too many freeloaders for years now.
We extended his contract last time as a way to stick by him as he tried to recover from his terrible injury. Not the best thing to do in a financial sense but a nice touch nonetheless.
The club would really turn into a heartless franchise if some of you had your way.
Jones is still only 30. Say he puts in two decent performances for us this season. Surely another five year contract has to be offered.
With improved terms naturally.Jones is still only 30. Say he puts in two decent performances for us this season. Surely another five year contract has to be offered.
Absolutely no way we do that at his age. It will be four years max
Christ, I had no idea that Phelan was still here. Utd really is a bizarrely manger club, huh? I mean, those above ETH.You are free to build your own opinion. If you ask mine, well, I have no doubt that this guy has close connections with SAF. I saw that myself when SAF visited Malta and I saw him seated near SAF a couple of times while watching the game on telly. There seem to be a job for the boys mentality as well. After all Rangnick himself said that he struggled to understand what Fletcher's role is not to forget that Phelan is still here despite not being anywhere near to ETH's coaching staff. What I do question is Ole's lack of involvement into Jones's deal. Surely someone who got the job through this way would be demanded to back those who wanted another matey of theirs to get a contract extension. As said this guy is an Ole loyalist. He still believe that he would have been able to turn things around especially if we allowed him full access to the funds we gave to ETH.
We extended his contract last time as a way to stick by him as he tried to recover from his terrible injury. Not the best thing to do in a financial sense but a nice touch nonetheless.
The club would really turn into a heartless franchise if some of you had your way.
Yeah and you're ignoring 90% of his career here and focusing on one brief period in time which doesn't give an accurate description.You said which club wanted an injured player and I was making it clear to anyone reading the reason why he didn’t go, not trying to cloud anyone’s thinking with all this talk of injuries.
If the club want to be charitable, there are people in a lot more need than Phil Jones.We extended his contract last time as a way to stick by him as he tried to recover from his terrible injury. Not the best thing to do in a financial sense but a nice touch nonetheless.
The club would really turn into a heartless franchise if some of you had your way.
yeah that's why the Glazers signed off on a multi-million pound contract - out of the goodness of their heart and had nothing to do with the sheer incompetence of the club. Yeah, let's go with thatWe extended his contract last time as a way to stick by him as he tried to recover from his terrible injury. Not the best thing to do in a financial sense but a nice touch nonetheless.
The club would really turn into a heartless franchise if some of you had your way.
Choose not to answer because you’re a weirdo.OK, you choose not to answer because you know your response was way out of proportion. Done.
90% of his career? You’re having a giraffe.Yeah and you're ignoring 90% of his career here and focusing on one brief period in time which doesn't give an accurate description.
yeah that's why the Glazers signed off on a multi-million pound contract - out of the goodness of their heart and had nothing to do with the sheer incompetence of the club. Yeah, let's go with that
Anyone knows why this was extended?
How do you know this?We extended his contract last time as a way to stick by him as he tried to recover from his terrible injury. Not the best thing to do in a financial sense but a nice touch nonetheless.
The club would really turn into a heartless franchise if some of you had your way.
It was a knee issue. Similar to what Ole had. He said that's why he had sympathy with Jones. He kept getting setbacks.
He didn't get injured before preseason. He was in the first few photos when Ten Hag started preseason training. Then he was left behind to work on a specific programme, like he did last preseason when he was working his way back to be fit for last season. He eventually got injured this time whereas he wasn't last year where he was available.
Why would I have that information on hand about his current injury? You're just lashing out because I knew all that info about him that's publicly available and you've been made to look ignorant. Tough.
Maybe his posters have been removedis it moved out from the dressing room?
or evicted?
or removed?
The weirdos are the ones who get weirdly angry over Phil Jones and the motivations they imagine he had.Choose not to answer because you’re a weirdo.
The club is not a charity.
You're obviously having a laugh. It will be a 4 year contract with the option of a further year.
Did you read the comment I was replying to, by any chance? The notion that the club would enter into a multimillion pound agreement purely out of a sense of sympathy to "stick by" a player with injury issues is absurd.Correct, its an employer subject to employment law and the terms and conditions of the contract.
It was for compassionate reasons don’t you know or that’s what PJ’s Army are trying to spin.The weirdos are the ones who get weirdly angry over Phil Jones and the motivations they imagine he had.
Those darn empathic assholes having compassion and not automatically assuming the absolute worst about the guy who has had his career ruined by injuries.It was for compassionate reasons don’t you know or that’s what PJ’s Army are trying to spin.
I don’t hate the guy, but also not really that fond of him.Those darn empathic assholes having compassion and not automatically assuming the absolute worst about the guy who has had his career ruined by injuries.
But you're right. He's a greedy cnut obsessed by money and we're all being paid to defend him. He's the George Soros of injury prone footballers.
As long as you pay all the remaining money in the cotracr, the player does not have to agree on anything.I believe Barkley had to agree to that? Wasn't it a mutual termination?
And it cost us 20m for the privilege of having a shit player on the surgery room.We extended his contract last time as a way to stick by him as he tried to recover from his terrible injury. Not the best thing to do in a financial sense but a nice touch nonetheless.
The club would really turn into a heartless franchise if some of you had your way.
I don’t hate the guy, but also not really that fond of him.
I just find it rich that after all the club has done for him, when asked to go out on loan he refused you’d think after being a sick note for so long you’d want to appease the people paying you but, no.
Then there was the whole calling people pot noodle eaters who dare say anything against him, just reeks of entitlement something I think the club want rid of and to step in a new direction.
Maybe he didn't to leave his wife and kid for months to go to France? If he'd turned down a loan to Blackburn or Wigan or something, I'd understand the annoyance, but he has perfectly legitimate reasons for not wanting to move to France.I don’t hate the guy, but also not really that fond of him.
I just find it rich that after all the club has done for him, when asked to go out on loan he refused you’d think after being a sick note for so long you’d want to appease the people paying you but, no.
You mean when he was talking specifically about the people who are mocking and abusing him? Calling them out reeks of entitlement?Then there was the whole calling people pot noodle eaters who dare say anything against him, just reeks of entitlement something I think the club want rid of and to step in a new direction.
supposedly Woodward/Judge saw players as assets to the value of the club
If he knows he’s done he should just admit it and walk away like Matic did.He's done and probably knows he's done. Why go out to another club and country for 8 or 9 months just to sit in their treatment room. If he doesn't trust his body, why go somewhere new where he will know no one and not speak the language simply to sit on their treatment tables rather than ours?
Fact is ETH has done the right thing moving him out of first team picture, but the club are also doing right thing by seeing out his contract with no drama, and PJ appears to be keeping quiet and going about remainder of his career with us. No bad guys here but some people just seem unreasonably angry about this.
Being asked to do your job after years of sick pay and refusing does yes.Maybe he didn't to leave his wife and kid for months to go to France? If he'd turned down a loan to Blackburn or Wigan or something, I'd understand the annoyance, but he has perfectly legitimate reasons for not wanting to move to France.
You mean when he was talking specifically about the people who are mocking and abusing him? Calling them out reeks of entitlement?
This response doesn't actually apply to any of my points, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.Being asked to do your job after years of sick pay and refusing does yes.
Well actually it does, you’re just lying to yourself now to justify an argument that even ETH seems set on putting to bed.This response doesn't actually apply to any of my points, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.