Hound Dog
Full Member
No chance of him ever getting sacked after a monumental achievement of winning 2 titles in 4 years with a side that won only 2 in 5 years before him. And all that on a relatively small spending of half a billion.
Would like to see Saint Kloppo deal with the injuries Pep has.
Yup, he's definitely failed on the trophies count.
2 in 4 is around what they had pre Pep. They just ended up with the same success rate minus a billion pounds.
3 season with Mancini they've won 3 titles (1 league, 2 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 59%
3 seasons with Pellegrini they've won 3 titles (1 league, 2 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 60%
3 seasons with Pep they've won 6 titles (2 leagues, 4 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 72%
Do we bloody really need to argue who's been more successfully?
So around 2 titles in 4 years? Dont forget peps annoincement derailing Pellegrinis last season when he was cruising to retaining the league.3 season with Mancini they've won 3 titles (1 league, 2 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 59%
3 seasons with Pellegrini they've won 3 titles (1 league, 2 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 60%
3 seasons with Pep they've won 6 titles (2 leagues, 4 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 72%
Do we bloody really need to argue who's been more successfully?
Why do you continue to post this blatant myth?Dont forget peps annoincement derailing Pellegrinis last season when he was cruising to retaining the league.
Wait, people are now downplaying his achievements at City? Good grief.
Many people here don't know how to be objective.Wait, people are now downplaying his achievements at City? Good grief.
They spent loads to get the first 2 in 4 as well. Also, would they have won the league last season with the others in charge instead of Pep?2 in 4 is around what they had pre Pep. They just ended up with the same success rate minus a billion pounds.
City were 4th or something and a team needing major fixes when he joined. Yet one lauds Mourinho who chucked money at everything that walked and Pep somehow deserved criticism. I mean Mourinho also won titles when the real big boys at the time, United, were going a transition. And when we got it together he started losing (and left).City were already winning premier leagues before pep, that’s not like mou at Chelsea.
they also won those premier leagues while every other big team were not even challenging, the one when Liverpool challenged it was close.
Man city just start their crazy spending under Mancini, when Pep take over, his team are already full of super star and he keep continuing buying spending, you can't compare it under Mancini3 season with Mancini they've won 3 titles (1 league, 2 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 59%
3 seasons with Pellegrini they've won 3 titles (1 league, 2 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 60%
3 seasons with Pep they've won 6 titles (2 leagues, 4 cups) --- Win rate as City manager 72%
Do we bloody really need to argue who's been more successfully?
How much money has Klopp spend on squad players compared to Pep though?Would like to see Saint Kloppo deal with the injuries Pep has.
Wasn't Naby Keita expensive though? He looks like their version of Fred. There is no way Pep is getting sacked. I can see him going full tilt at the CL this season. I can only imagine how good Pep would have been with Messi, Griezmann, dembele, suarez and De Jong.How much money has Klopp spend on squad players compared to Pep though?
They spent loads to get the first 2 in 4 as well. Also, would they have won the league last season with the others in charge instead of Pep?
Why do you continue to post this blatant myth?
When Guardiola was announced City were 3 points behind Leicester. Had lost 5 and drawn 5 in 23 games. Were on poor form before the announcement.
3 games in Feb were defeats to Leicester, Liverpool and Spurs. Pool won 4-1 at City earlier in the season, Spurs humped them 4-1 at home as well. They drew at Leicester.
Stop peddling this absolute myth about City that season.
What does that have to do with the question he asked?Wasn't Naby Keita expensive though? He looks like their version of Fred. There is no way Pep is getting sacked. I can see him going full tilt at the CL this season. I can only imagine how good Pep would have been with Messi, Griezmann, dembele, suarez and De Jong.
Oh I totally agree, and that’s why I want him back. Pep needs to stop fecking about in Germany and England, and realize that Barca is his home.I can only imagine how good Pep would have been with Messi, Griezmann, dembele, suarez and De Jong.
So around 2 titles in 4 years? Dont forget peps annoincement derailing Pellegrinis last season when he was cruising to retaining the league.
Have you seen Peps cup draws by the way?
Well done on carling cups i supposd
Well I don't agree with that. For me, Pep will never match Sir Alex. I do think there are valid drawbacks to Pep as a manager as is the case with every single - he does need a certain standard of technical talent in his team and I don't think he ticks all the boxes like SAF did of being able to succeed in every possible environment. He also, as is the case with the modern manager, more or less a coach, whereas Sir Alex could run the whole empire and was a true manager in the traditional sense.People here would say anything to downplay Pep. He is second only to SAF on the all-time list. He also has a real chance to surpass him if he continues managing for another 10 to 15 years.
Now he's to blame for the teams poor season before he joined (making his job tougher). You clearly aren't in a position to present a logical view on Guardiola given your lack of perspective in general on the matter.So around 2 titles in 4 years? Dont forget peps annoincement derailing Pellegrinis last season when he was cruising to retaining the league.
Have you seen Peps cup draws by the way?
Well done on carling cups i supposd
I think they had a game in hand to go back to top. On for the quadruple in Feb, reaching the CL semi in the end up.Why do you continue to post this blatant myth?
When Guardiola was announced City were 3 points behind Leicester. Had lost 5 and drawn 5 in 23 games. Were on poor form before the announcement.
3 games in Feb were defeats to Leicester, Liverpool and Spurs. Pool won 4-1 at City earlier in the season, Spurs humped them 4-1 at home as well. They drew at Leicester.
Stop peddling this absolute myth about City that season.
Well... Yes? Will i post their results from Feb to May or....Now he's to blame for the teams poor season before he joined (making his job tougher). You clearly aren't in a position to present a logical view on Guardiola given your lack of perspective in general on the matter.
Pep Guardiola has revealed how his relationship with chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak plays a big factor in him wanting to stay at Manchester City .
The Blues boss this week dismissed rumours that he is preparing to leave City, and even hinted that he could seek to stay beyond the end of his current contract in 2021.
And that was underlined by chairman Khaldoon, who said in midweek: “I'm very satisfied with his commitment and our commitment to him and I'm looking forward to the continuity of this for years to come.”
The harmonious relationship between Guardiola , Khaldoon, chief executive Ferran Soriano and football director Txiki Begiristain is a huge lure for the Catalan coach after the wearying politics of Barcelona and the meddling of club legends at Bayern Munich.
And the way in which Khaldoon and the club executive team rallied behind him during a difficult, trophy-less first season in England, has reinforced the manager’s belief that he is at the right club to achieve his further ambitions.
Any manager given the squad and financial backing Guardiola has had at City would be expected to deliver what he has as a bare minimum.Well I don't agree with that. For me, Pep will never match Sir Alex. I do think there are valid drawbacks to Pep as a manager as is the case with every single - he does need a certain standard of technical talent in his team and I don't think he ticks all the boxes like SAF did of being able to succeed in every possible environment. He also, as is the case with the modern manager, more or less a coach, whereas Sir Alex could run the whole empire and was a true manager in the traditional sense.
So I'll never go that far with Pep. For me he doesn't reach the level of Sir Alex. However, among the modern day managers he's the best IMO. And even one has a preference for someone else & say Mourinho for example (the only one of this era with that level of success), we have to be fair to Pep and maintain some amount of balance when judging him. He's done an excellent job at City and pretending 2 titles in 4, particularly when one was a transitional year and the third needed some 100 points to win the title, is not balance at all. By any metric he's done a very very good at City. Unless CL is the only metric which is silly given many elite football clubs have 1/2/3/4 in their entire history.
If he is sacked we need to do everything possible to get him in. We're a better club than City, we can surely take their manager from them. Imagine Pep and Jose going head to head with two different teams again it would make for the best storylines, we would all love it.
That's really not how Klopp works, he works with a small group of players of a certain level, when the group is to large he often loses the grip just like happend at bvb. But again Pep is dealing with some serious injuries to key players, Liverpool would be in a really bad state with half of those. Klopp has really been lucky with injuries to key players at Liverpool.How much money has Klopp spend on squad players compared to Pep though?