That_Bloke
Full Member
You seem to know quite a bit about football.Pep Guardiola is my idol got exposed in the end.
You seem to know quite a bit about football.Pep Guardiola is my idol got exposed in the end.
1. Loss of Laporte, Sane, Zinchenko. De Bruyne was out for a bit too.
2. Father time catching up to Silva the Elder
3. Otamendi falling out of form
4. Midfield being imbalanced due to lack of Fernandinho at base, Rodri still getting used to system
Those come to mind immediately.
I think he's gone in the summer, mutual consent - he'll be managing PSG or Juventus next season. He has no fight in him, Klopp's embarrassed him this season and he won't come back for more.
Record this record that. Does anyone really care about records? It’s the trophies that count.
He was taken on at city to win the champions league. He had a great starting team and spent his own millions and done the same as previous city managers. I just don’t think that’s terrific
Yep. City believe that having Pep as their manager is such a coup that they put his photo on their (online) team-sheets.I don't know how people can come to this conclusion. You have to be mental to think that City are going to pull the trigger. Ain't gonna happen.
I don't know how people can come to this conclusion. You have to be mental to think that City are going to pull the trigger. Ain't gonna happen. Pep will leave on his own terms when he doesn't feel that he can more out his team anymore.
Injury this season hasn't been kind to them add Aguero to that list too and Ederson miss the Liverpool game also. Sane would've probably been a Bayern player imo another mishandling from Pep for putting him on the bench, Mahrez is good, but doesn't offer what Sane did, this was his chance and he hasn't been all that.
D. Silva is on Pep and City head imo. He was done last season they should've let him go and started giving his spot to B. Silva, instead the typical sentimental bull crap probably kicked in and he'll be a liability now. This game in particularly should've had B. Silva starting so that's on Pep.
Gundo is another issue, while a quality player if they're over the foreign player policy they should've cashed in on him and bought in another CB this summer, but due to some bromance between him and Pep they didn't, at the end losing Gundo gaining a CB and rotating between Rodri/Ferna in mid would've been better.
Pep needs to give Gracia (he was highly rated in Barcelona, reason why City got him) a chance instead of being a tit about it maybe he'll have a similar impact Gomez did last season, I mean he can't be an worse then what they got now.
He has done a good job and injuries have derailed City a little bit.
ThisI think he's gone in the summer, mutual consent - he'll be managing PSG or Juventus next season. He has no fight in him, Klopp's embarrassed him this season and he won't come back for more.
Here's a thread title I thought I'd never see. Last I saw City were still second?
To be fair, this forum has had posts like this for.... well, 4 seasons in a row now, so incidentally since Guardiola's tenure.
Himself being burnt out included. If you watch the amazon documentary, all or nothing you can see why. The fella thinks tactics in his sleep. How draining that must be.Im pretty sure i read here that Pep's style of management is quite draining on the players, so his teams start to regress after a while because the players are burnt out or whatever
Himself being burnt out included. If you watch the amazon documentary, all or nothing you can see why. The fella thinks tactics in his sleep. How draining that must be.
Tbh I can see the same happening at Liverpool when they finally win the title. Klopps another nutcase that demands 100% every second. No detail too small. Nobody can keep that up for a sustained period of time.
2 premier league's in 4 years is a terrific return. They've won domestic cups too. You do realise that we as a football club have won 3 CLs in our entire history right? SAF won 2 over a 20 plus tenure. Expecting a manager to have to win one within 3 years is daft.2 prems in 4 years and no champions league. Is that any better than the previous city managers? Not that terrific
He will be sacked in April.
I have spoken.
Yeah, they're a bitch. Tend to vary - in terms of impact - from season to season too.
But according to some, they're no excuse. An "elite" manager should be able to deal with them.
To be clear, I'm being sarcastic on the whole, before anyone jumps in. It's feckin' obvious that what players you have available at any given time is somewhat relevant to how well you "perform" as a manager. And the idea that a manager - any manager - "performs", like an individual player, in isolated matches (by virtue of being a master tactician - or the opposite) is laughable in itself.
City were already winning premier leagues before pep, that’s not like mou at Chelsea.2 premier league's in 4 years is a terrific return. They've won domestic cups too. You do realise that we as a football club have won 3 CLs in our entire history right? SAF won 2 over a 20 plus tenure. Expecting a manager to have to win one within 3 years is daft.
As someone else pointed out, was Mourinho's two league titles in three years at Chelsea not good enough? Of course not. Suggesting so would be idiotic.
Haven't heard that one tbh but I wouldn't read too much into it. This long term plan is like a fail safe switch for when things inevitably go tits up. Whoever is the Glazers PR chief certainly deserves a hefty Xmas bonus for thinking that one up.Didn't a journalist write that our "Long term" approach was taken as we knew there was no chance of bettering either team until those two managers have gone?
I thought at the time that was breathtakingly ridiculous, to presume that they get dud replacements, or other clubs don't take their place.
Haven't heard that one tbh but I wouldn't read too much into it. This long term plan is like a fail safe switch for when things inevitably go tits up. Whoever is the Glazers PR chief certainly deserves a hefty Xmas bonus for thinking that one up.
Ironic isn't it? I heard we're moving into the 21st century and are now using opta to analyse future transfers. It can supposedly tell the club if the player can eat pasta before a game or the % rate of the chances of him being homesick or warning that he can only last 79 minutes and 38 seconds each game. Call me old fashioned but what a load of bolloxThere's been a lot of stories put out about how we do things the right way, when all evidence suggests otherwise.
Thta story about how we'd analysed 700 players or something was the best one. Then ended up buying the highest priced, super well known 2 defenders from our own league!
Can we have him after we dismiss Ole in the summer? United can offer him the highest paid manager in the world in the history of football
2 in 4 is around what they had pre Pep. They just ended up with the same success rate minus a billion pounds.2 premier league's in 4 years is a terrific return. They've won domestic cups too. You do realise that we as a football club have won 3 CLs in our entire history right? SAF won 2 over a 20 plus tenure. Expecting a manager to have to win one within 3 years is daft.
As someone else pointed out, was Mourinho's two league titles in three years at Chelsea not good enough? Of course not. Suggesting so would be idiotic.