Paul Pogba | Undergoing Medical | Helping out the Laundry Ladies

Do you want Pogba for £100 million?


  • Total voters
    1,968
So even you admit that the Pogba transfer is much harder to complete than the others?

of course I do. Its one thing signing an arrogant has been whose 1-2 years away for the glue factory and its another taking a top guy from a top club. Our club has little experience on these sort of transfers and that inexperience is bloody obvious on this deal. Maybe we should aim for a transfer similar to Ibra. Is Pirlo still available? Pirlo, Bastian, Carrick in midfield and Ibra upfront would have been great 7 years ago
 
Lol I agree with you but one of the deals I am trying to close, while 100% agreed on the contractual fees, just broke down because of legal terms and both parties were not willing to concede... Now we are going to an executive meeting so. In real life it can happen!

Then it's not an agreed deal, if we're still negotiating payments then it's not an agreed deal, if we haven't agreed on all the details then it's simply not agreed.
 
of course I do. Its one thing signing an arrogant has been whose 1-2 years away for the glue factory and its another taking a top guy from a top club. Our club has little experience on these sort of transfers and that inexperience is bloody obvious on this deal. Maybe we should aim for a transfer similar to Ibra. Is Pirlo still available? Pirlo, Bastian, Carrick in midfield and Ibra upfront would have been great 7 years ago

Sounds like you really love United and enjoy supporting the club.
 
of course I do. Its one thing signing an arrogant has been whose 1-2 years away for the glue factory and its another taking a top guy from a top club. Our club has little experience on these sort of transfers and that inexperience is bloody obvious on this deal
Well in that case maybe only Madrid is "experienced". It Has nothing to do with big transfers from big clubs. You going to pull off the biggest transfer in the history of mankind let alone football. It's going to take time with the different clauses, paperwork and legal issues.
 
The opinions of the majority in here, are borne from an enormous amount of evidence, allbeit, circumstantial.

Your opinion is borne out of negativity and the obvious attention it attracts.

Surely, you must be able to see how annoying you are?
:lol:
 
Well if a deal is agreed it doesn't mean the player is ready to play for his new club. It has to be made official. Then he is ready. Same thing here. A deal could very well be agreed. But until the paperwork and all legal issues are fixed and made official he isn't our player.

If the deal is agreed nothing stops it from being official, paperwork don't take weeks.
 
Well in that case maybe only Madrid is "experienced". It Has nothing to do with big transfers from big clubs. You going to pull off the biggest transfer in the history of mankind let alone football. It's going to take time with the different clauses, paperwork and legal issues.

Not really. Bayern weren't tortured for Vidal as we're being tortured for Pogba. Barcelona's deal for Suarez was pretty straightforward too. PSG signed ADM in no time

This deal is becoming a bit of a circus. As said maybe we should take the Ibra/Bastian/Carrick route and sign Pirlo. That's the sort of signings we seem good at
 
MEN article said Juve is holding up the deal while they try to get a replacement player. DiMarzio said the other day it was waiting on Juve's lawyers and the board signatures.

So maybe Juve are getting cold feet at the altar, or maybe they are just buying time for other negotiations before everyone knows they have a big influx of cash.

But regardless, it seems to be in Juve's hands.

That's possible, but not likely, in my opinion. Juventus have already shown that they can spend big this summer by signing Higuain. You might say that was the Pogba money being spent before they'd even received it, but the point is they aren't exactly skint.

As far as a replacement for Pogba, they have also signed Pjanic, who will fill Pogba's gap in the squad, at least to some extent. I think if they are now looking to spend the money received from the Pogba sale, they'll be looking at other areas of the squad. They may even just sit on that money for the moment - their current squad, even without Pogba, will surely cruise to another Serie A title and compete in the CL too.
 
of course I do. Its one thing signing an arrogant has been whose 1-2 years away for the glue factory and its another taking a top guy from a top club. Our club has little experience on these sort of transfers and that inexperience is bloody obvious on this deal. Maybe we should aim for a transfer similar to Ibra. Is Pirlo still available? Pirlo, Bastian, Carrick in midfield and Ibra upfront would have been great 7 years ago

I think you are making a very good point here @devilish. This really is new ground for Woodward in particular.
 
This will happen, I've zero doubt, but even I can admit I don't really get how we're still dragging it out this long.
It's because we must respect Pogba's holiday plans. Can't you see that? :nono:
 
Thanks. Yup - actually mind-blowing when you look at things this way. That said, Rio was a massive success. Was the bedrock on which Fergie built 2-3 teams of title-winners and people forget that for all of Ronaldo's (and Rooney's to be fair) exploits, it was the defence that won us the title several times. van der Saar was not a one-man shield of the type that de Gea has had to become. Veron, well, different story, but I can still see the logic for why we paid what we did.



Where do I begin? Rooney was 18 and cost upwards of 30 Mn over a decade ago. Fellaini cost us 30 Mn. How you come out with a 45-55 for Pogba is mind-boggling. Zidane, as I pointed out, cost 57 Mn 15 years ago and had similar statistics (though he was more developed as a player). I just don't get how people start pinging these numbers around. Have you actually studied the business model of clubs? A club needs to look at how players (and the whole team and their performances) will translate into commercial contracts, merchandise sales (which get bigger sponsors) and visibility as well as following. Pogba - apart from dramatically improving our chances of winning titles - is immensely popular and assures greater viewership and interest. The world record fee, combined with United's marketing machine will ensure that this translates into bigger commercial deals as well. Can't see how Troy Deeney, Fellaini et al do on this.

As for your point on the Euros, I can only shake my head in wonder. Would you also say that Muller and Lewandowski are sh*te? Of course, Kane must be absolutely pants, not to mention losers like Dier and Dele Alli, right? Not worth 10 Mn for the lot of them, then. It beggars belief how people continue to trot out the same lame arguments time after time paying no heed to the actual numbers that make up football.

Here are just some numbers on Man United's revenues:
2000-01: 217.2 Mn Euros
2005-06: 242.6 Mn Euros (remember how pants we'd become and how we had no "galacticos"? Here's the outcome)
2010-11: 367 Mn Euros (Now we're talking. Win the CL, have Ronaldo explode. Build on Rooney's then-shining star...)
2014-15: 520 Mn Euros (Still riding the wave of popularity)

The numbers have exploded, but reality is we're slipping! In 2000-01, United were #1. We're now #3. We're also only about 50 Mn ahead of City. We need to continue pushing and you don't do that by talking about how "things was different in my day. You'd ne'er see these kids prancin' around in Ferraris at this age". We need to move with the times. Pogba (given it will happen) will be the absolutely right move at just the time we need it.

Cheers!
We'll see.
 
Not really. Bayern weren't tortured for Vidal as we're being tortured for Pogba. Barcelona's deal for Suarez was pretty straightforward too. PSG signed ADM in no time

This deal is becoming a bit of a circus. As said maybe we should take the Ibra/Bastian/Carrick route and sign Pirlo. That's the sort of signings we seem good at
Vidal went for 35m didn't he? Liverpool had to sell. There was pressure on them to do so and use the money to rebuild. They were all for it. Yes it's above 60m but their situation was different. Here Juventus don't have to sell. Hence they have a better hand in this deal. I'm telling the price is what makes this deal different. I'm talking about deals over 60m. Madrid have three of those and Barca have one. So when talking about your "experience" argument only they classify. And what's different in those other deals was that the selling club didn't owe the player's agent any % of the fee. So essentially those deals were between two parties - the two clubs. Here again this is different between its between three parties - the two clubs and the player' agent.
 
Renato is reportedly 18. Pogba is 23.

5 years ago, Pogba was occasionally making the bench, the few cameos he was given he failed to impress against weak opposition and anyone who thought he was 'miles ahead' of the rest of our youth team are looking through rose tinted glasses. His move to Juve was largely uncontested by any other big clubs and he wasn't the 3rd, 4th or 5th choice midfielder for one of the best managers the game has seen.

I acknowledged that every youth player follows a different development curve.

Renato has clearly displayed more talent than Pogba did 5 years ago. Even if you use the argument that Benfica is a worse club in a worse league, looks at his performances on European and International level. Renato has seized the chances he has been given and deservedly earned a transfer to one of the largest clubs in the world.

I fail to see anything absurd about my post.

Why the shit are you using Fergie's feck up for an arguement in this case? Fergie fecked up big time with Pogba, and playing Rafael and Park ahead of him was just the icing on the cake. Great manager, but he wasn't perfect. He made mistakes, and Pogba was one of his biggest.
 
The only good thing is that we know that our club is super slow in terms of the transfer market
Ok tell me which world transfer breaking fee has ever been done as quickly as you'd like to imply.

It's like the Ronaldo's and Bale's transfers never occurred reading some stuff posted in here.
 
Great post

You are on a roll with this.

Don't think there is anything great about comparing Zidan's statistics with Pogba's and then coming to the conclusion that the fee is justified. I am sure a little google search will throw at least 5 other midfielders who'll have similar stats to Pogba's last season. Does that mean they are all worth 100m?

Zidane was the best player in the world when Real bought him from Juve. Pogba has a long way to go to come even close to Zidane's level.
 
Last edited:
If the deal is agreed nothing stops it from being official, paperwork don't take weeks.
Problem is, we don't know what type of agreement it is. I'm assuming it's a verbal agreement as the paperwork and legal stuff is being done. We wouldn't announce something based on a verbal agreement, anything could happen in the time from that agreement being made to the paperwork being done and everything being signed.
What if we announced that we have a 'agreed' a fee for Pogba based on a verbal agreement and in that time stuff goes wrong, or Juve suddenly decide to break that verbal agreement and demand more etc. Thats the problem, we don't know what type of agreement there is. There might have been an agreement on the fee, but not on the little things - payment structure etc. People say paperwork doesn't take weeks too, yes thats correct, but as i say, maybe we've only reached a firm verbal agreement over everything in the past few days and now everything is being written up for a solid written agreement? In that case, until that written agreement is signed, and Pogba is 'released' from Juventus, he is still one of their players, and if they demand he goes to training, he goes to training. He can refuse of course, but it doesn't look good on him does it and it's most definitely a huge disrespect to Juventus too.

All this is just my opinion though as i have no idea whats going on behind the scenes, same as everyone else here. And i'm sure none of us here actually know for sure what goes on in a football transfer
 
Vidal went for 35m didn't he? Liverpool had to sell. There was pressure on them to do so and use the money to rebuild. They were all for it. Yes it's above 60m but their situation was different. Here Juventus don't have to sell. Hence they have a better hand in this deal. I'm telling the price is what makes this deal different. I'm talking about deals over 60m. Madrid have three of those and Barca have one. So when talking about your "experience" argument only they classify. And what's different in those other deals was that the selling club didn't owe the player's agent any % of the fee. So essentially those deals were between two parties - the two clubs. Here again this is different between its between three parties - the two clubs and the player' agent.

If a club isn't keen of being ripped a new one then they don't bid for players from a club like Juventus. Dont take me wrong they aren't Barcelona/Real but they are tough clubs to make deals with. Now my argument is simple here do we really need to spend 100m on a midfielder whose more comfortable as no 10 then anywhere else and whose not that keen to play for us in the first Iplace? If yes, then lets pay everything Juventus throw to us. If not then we move for other targets.

We've placed ourselves in a tight corner now. If we end up with some Matuidi after so many weeks chasing Pogba then we would look silly and there's no chance Juventus will relent on their price.
 
Ok tell me which world transfer breaking fee has ever been done as quickly as you'd like to imply.

It's like the Ronaldo's and Bale's transfers never occurred reading some stuff posted in here.

Ronaldo and Bale were much better players then Pogba and Juventus aren't Manchester United either
 
Not really. Bayern weren't tortured for Vidal as we're being tortured for Pogba. Barcelona's deal for Suarez was pretty straightforward too. PSG signed ADM in no time

This deal is becoming a bit of a circus. As said maybe we should take the Ibra/Bastian/Carrick route and sign Pirlo. That's the sort of signings we seem good at
Let's take this case-by-case:

1. Vidal - let's just accept that Bayern are exceptional at transfers, for starters. Secondly, Vidal was always going to move and this was open knowledge. Christ, we had a thread on here for 18 months over the man! That the transfer was done and "Bayern weren't tortured" presumes that we are being tortured. No report shows that the club is being tortured. The only folks being tortured are the fans who continue to wait expectantly despite knowing that the player in question is on vacation an ocean away!

2. Suarez - the courting went on over the year and it was open knowledge that he would move. He'd agreed the thing with the club in advance.

3. AdM - Always wanted to move to PSG even when at Madrid. And signed "in no time"? Guessing you've forgotten all the stuff he pulled by not returning to the club for training (yep, he did that), LvG saying we were expecting him etc. etc.? It was in no way done "in no time".

Big transfers always take time and it would be a myth to say we are not "experienced". We've broken the British record several times. We've also done the deal for AdM at quite a significant price. That it fell short of the record is neither here nor there.

Now, Ronaldo was courted for well over a year. Even after his "prisoner" status etc., the deal took over a year and was sealed in July because we made an agreement with him a year in advance. Bale was a deadline-day signing for Madrid. So was AdM for us. In this case, the player is actually on a vacation (planned) after a major tournament. Given all that, the very fact that this could easily be done within the first half of August is actually very efficient!
 
Don't think there is anything great about comparing Zidan's statistics with Pogba's and then coming to the conclusion that the fee is justified. I am sure a little google search will throw at least 5 other midfielders who'll similar stats to Pogba's last season. Does that mean they are all worth 100m?

Zidane was the best player in the world when Real bought him from Juve. Pogba has a long way to go to come even close to Zidane's level.
He mentioned more than that in his two posts that I read.
 
Ronaldo and Bale were much better players then Pogba and Juventus aren't Manchester United either
What does this have to do with anything? We're talking about world record breaking transfer fees, not whether which players were better. And I disagree with Bale by the way.

Both Bales and Ronaldo transfer saga dragged on forever and a lot of drama were involved, so for you to say that we are the first and only one dealing this slowly when it comes to such a huge transfer is simply not true, not even close.
 
Let's take this case-by-case:

1. Vidal - let's just accept that Bayern are exceptional at transfers, for starters. Secondly, Vidal was always going to move and this was open knowledge. Christ, we had a thread on here for 18 months over the man! That the transfer was done and "Bayern weren't tortured" presumes that we are being tortured. No report shows that the club is being tortured. The only folks being tortured are the fans who continue to wait expectantly despite knowing that the player in question is on vacation an ocean away!

2. Suarez - the courting went on over the year and it was open knowledge that he would move. He'd agreed the thing with the club in advance.

3. AdM - Always wanted to move to PSG even when at Madrid. And signed "in no time"? Guessing you've forgotten all the stuff he pulled by not returning to the club for training (yep, he did that), LvG saying we were expecting him etc. etc.? It was in no way done "in no time".

Big transfers always take time and it would be a myth to say we are not "experienced". We've broken the British record several times. We've also done the deal for AdM at quite a significant price. That it fell short of the record is neither here nor there.

Now, Ronaldo was courted for well over a year. Even after his "prisoner" status etc., the deal took over a year and was sealed in July because we made an agreement with him a year in advance. Bale was a deadline-day signing for Madrid. So was AdM for us. In this case, the player is actually on a vacation (planned) after a major tournament. Given all that, the very fact that this could easily be done within the first half of August is actually very efficient!

All deals had 3 things in common. The buyer club wanted him, the player wanted to move there and the club had other targets in mind. In terms of Pogba we want him, we're not that sure if we are his first option and we do not seem to have any other targets in mind. And please don't mention Matuidi
 
What does this have to do with anything? We're talking about world record breaking transfer fees, not whether which players were better. And I disagree with Bale by the way.

Both Bales and Ronaldo transfer saga dragged on forever and a lot of drama were involved, so for you to say that we are the first and only one dealing this slowly when it comes to such a huge transfer is simply not true, not even close.

I am a big fan of Pogba and he's nowhere near to Bale. Its one thing getting Ronaldo who was the best player in the world (and the most marketable) from one of the top clubs in the world and its another taking a good player who play with the Celtic of the 4th best league in the world
 
To those people saying United are slow blah blah, why are you assuming that it's United dragging their heels? They have no reason to, United want to close asap and get working with the player. If there is a holdup you can be sure it's not United delaying.
 
. Now my argument is simple here do we really need to spend 100m on a midfielder whose more comfortable as no 10 then anywhere else and whose not that keen to play for us in the first Iplace?.
Why do people keep making the argument he doesn't want to play for us when there is no basis to it?
 
To those people saying United are slow blah blah, why are you assuming that it's United dragging their heels? They have no reason to, United want to close asap and get working with the player. If there is a holdup you can be sure it's not United delaying.

I think you're probably right but equally I agree with the point that this is very new type of transfer for us. There could be a lot of legal stuff going on from United and Pogba's side that is slowing it down.
 
Why do people keep making the argument he doesn't want to play for us when there is no basis to it?
Well he left us once before

We aren't in the CL

Nearly every reporter suggested at the start of the saga he prefered Real

He is joining us purely for the cash
 
974 pages on this, really? :lol:

It won't happen, he'll either stay at Juve, or Madrid will gazump us at the last minute. I've said this all along
You've said it all along and you will be proven wrong all along.
 
I am a big fan of Pogba and he's nowhere near to Bale. Its one thing getting Ronaldo who was the best player in the world (and the most marketable) from one of the top clubs in the world and its another taking a good player who play with the Celtic of the 4th best league in the world
Look I'm not going to argue about which player is better or not given I see it very debatable and it would only derail from the main point.

So to get back to it, how about you answer me properly? I asked you whether you've never seen a world record breaking transfer fee drag on before. And from you answers you're obviously aware of it happening before with both Ronaldo and Bale. Whether it came from lesser players or lesser league is beside the point. We're talking about a world record transfer fee which is what is common in all 3 cases.

And please stop with the Celtic comparisons. This is why opposing team fans think some in here are arrogant and delusional. We're talking about Juventus here, not some bloody third rate teams. In case you're not aware Juve are still one of the biggest European club in the world, it might help you knowing that.
 
Well he left us once before

We aren't in the CL

Nearly every reporter suggested at the start of the saga he prefered Real

He is joining us purely for the cash
He left us because it was our mistake.

We aren't in the CL and he still wants to come - it can't be just the money.

Every reporter didn't say he wanted Madrid - Ballbag the cnut was running with it. It still doesn't make it true.

Again no basis for your argument - he is purely joining for the cash.
 
He left us because it was our mistake.

We aren't in the CL and he still wants to come - it can't be just the money.

Every reporter didn't say he wanted Madrid - Ballbag the cnut was running with it. It still doesn't make it true.

Again no basis for your argument - he is purely joining for the cash.

Ballague wasn't the only reporter saying this at all.

You would have to give your head a wobble if you genuinely think he would choose us over Real in a straight choice.
 
As I said in an earlier post maybe it's the fact that he actually really does want to play for us rather than being reluctant to as so many seem to believe. I used the phrase unfinished business for lack of a better one but perhaps he really does have an affinity with the club which resulted in a genuine desire to return having only left in the first place because he felt he had no other choice lest he hamper his own development.