Paul Pogba | Undergoing Medical | Helping out the Laundry Ladies

Do you want Pogba for £100 million?


  • Total voters
    1,968
Think it probably would make more of a difference in the champions league registrations. Not sure if they use different criteria or not, but pogba qualifies for both in football manager, and it could be because he was here for most of 3 seasons, between 2009 and 2012, not necessarily needing full 36 months or to have been there since game 1
Yes, it seems like they'll count 9/10 as a full season, along with 10/11 and 11/12 which will make him homegrown. I'm surprised, didn't think he'd get it, Jones didn't get it IIRC, and he was short by much less.
 
Will Pogba get a new haircut if he signs with us ?

Maybay he can color it part red with a devil shaven in it :drool:
 
Fair enough. My point was it seems a bit arbitrary. Home-grown could mean anything really, particularly if the age cut off is 21.

Everything is arbitrary, your alternative is also arbitrary. I mean, in some countries you are considered an adult at 21 not 18, that's also arbitrary. But in that case, it's just due to the fact that youth football and the formative years stop at the U21 category after that you are supposed to be ready for Senior football.
 
Everything is arbitrary, your alternative is also arbitrary. I mean, in some countries you are considered an adult at 21 not 18, that's also arbitrary. But in that case, it's just due to the fact that youth football and the formative years stop at the U21 category after that you are supposed to be ready for Senior football.

Goes back to your point I guess about what constitutes a 'youth' team player.
 
Just managed to find the official PL handbook rather than a third party copy (the PL website fecking sucks)



There's no doubt; Pogba is not a homegrown player.

Just to clarify, they define a season so we know how to count the season he turns 21 in, but the confusing part is that they say he has to be with the club 3 seasons or 36 months. Do they count 36 months from the beginning of his first season with a qualifying club or 36 months from the moment he joins? Not disagreeing, just making sure I understand.
 
I must say I'm getting rather excited at the thought of having such a positive, driving force in midfield again. It's been too long.
 
Just to clarify, they define a season so we know how to count the season he turns 21 in, but the confusing part is that they say he has to be with the club 3 seasons or 36 months. Do they count 36 months from the beginning of his first season with a qualifying club or 36 months from the moment he joins? Not disagreeing, just making sure I understand.
From registration, and the season is defined for the purpose of clarifying 'complete'.
 
Yes, it seems like they'll count 9/10 as a full season, along with 10/11 and 11/12 which will make him homegrown. I'm surprised, didn't think he'd get it, Jones didn't get it IIRC, and he was short by much less.

This can't be right - Phil Jones was developed in the Football League, first with Blackburn and then United and so there is no way he did not count as an English home-grown player for PL purposes. It doesn't have to be with the current club.
 
Yes, it seems like they'll count 9/10 as a full season, along with 10/11 and 11/12 which will make him homegrown. I'm surprised, didn't think he'd get it, Jones didn't get it IIRC, and he was short by much less.

We signed him in July 2009, so the 2009/10 season is 1.
The 10/11 season would be 2.
He left after the 2011/12 season, so that would be 3 seasons.

He was born in 1993 so he turned 21 in 2014.

@Rado_N am I applying the rule correctly?
 
Yes, it seems like they'll count 9/10 as a full season, along with 10/11 and 11/12 which will make him homegrown. I'm surprised, didn't think he'd get it, Jones didn't get it IIRC, and he was short by much less.

We signed him in July 2009, so the 2009/10 season is 1.
The 10/11 season would be 2.
He left after the 2011/12 season, so that would be 3 seasons.

He was born in 1993 so he turned 21 in 2014.
2009/10 does not constitute a complete season, as he wasn't registered until October. This is why he doesn't qualify.
 
Also, if we (or anyone else) had signed him again at least 3 months before he turned 21 he would have qualified.
 
Scroll up it has been posted.

Got it. Okay. Why 3 years? Again my point is its an arbitary rule as all rules are. This particular rule is hardly true to the real 'spirit' of home-grown players now is it.
As will be proven very clearly when we re-sign Paul Pogba. Think about it.
We will have a player on our books that we originally poached from Le Harve and bought back from Juve for £100m. And he will be defined as 'home-grown'. Football's governing bodies never fail to amaze me.
 
Got it. Okay. Why 3 years? Again my point is its an arbitary rule as all rules are. This particular rule is hardly true to the real 'spirit' of home-grown players now is it.
As will be proven very clearly when we re-sign Paul Pogba. Think about it.
We will have a player on our books that we originally poached from Le Harve and bought back from Juve for £100m. And he will be defined as 'home-grown'. Football's governing bodies never fail to amaze me.
No he won't!!!!
 
Got it. Okay. Why 3 years? Again my point is its an arbitary rule as all rules are. This particular rule is hardly true to the real 'spirit' of home-grown players now is it.
As will be proven very clearly when we re-sign Paul Pogba. Think about it.
We will have a player on our books that we originally poached from Le Harve and bought back from Juve for £100m. And he will be defined as 'home-grown'. Football's governing bodies never fail to amaze me.

Because it represents half of the formative years. It's not even that difficult to understand.
 
This can't be right - Phil Jones was developed in the Football League, first with Blackburn and then United and so there is no way he did not count as an English home-grown player for PL purposes. It doesn't have to be with the current club.
Yes, I don't mean nationally, but he was like a month short of counting as homegrown at Man Utd.
 
At the risk of going slightly off topic... :nervous:

Why does it matter if he's homegrown or not? Could we have a lack of homegrown players for the CL or something?
 
Got it. Okay. Why 3 years? Again my point is its an arbitary rule as all rules are. This particular rule is hardly true to the real 'spirit' of home-grown players now is it.
As will be proven very clearly when we re-sign Paul Pogba. Think about it.
We will have a player on our books that we originally poached from Le Harve and bought back from Juve for £100m. And he will be defined as 'home-grown'. Football's governing bodies never fail to amaze me.

Not sure what you are really arguing here, the rule is what it is. Pogba falls short of being Home Grown by bit over a month. Nationality does not play a part in a player being home grown, because it would violate the law. We got Pogba when he was 16, so there is no issue with him being Home Grown had he spent enough time here because he would have developed with us.

The rule is intended to get clubs to use players developed within the two FA's. Now they don't have to be developed from the time they were 8 years old.

It is as arbitrary as any rule is, so what, not sure why that is an issue with you except you seem to want to argue everything in this thread today.
 
the 3 season thing does not have to be with the same club, it can be with multiple clubs as long as the are part of the FA or FA of Wales.

But in that case he will only be an association-trained player, if he spents the three years with the same club he is a club-trained player. From the UEFA pov, the first one qualifies for the list of 8 players association-trained and the second for the list of 4 players club-trained.
 
I think he's more physical than 'all action'. Relies on his phsyique rather than dynamism.

What does that mean? Semantics to me.

When asked to think of "dynamic" players I'd think of the likes of Vieira and Keane in their prime, players able to cover a lot of ground and get you on the front foot. Physicality is part of that.
 
What does that mean? Semantics to me.

When asked to think of "dynamic" players I'd think of the likes of Vieira and Keane in their prime, players able to cover a lot of ground and get you on the front foot. Physicality is part of that.

Nail on the head. I see two very different players there. I'd always prefer a Keane type player to a Vieria one. And as I said ages ago Pogba reminds me of Viera.
 
Not sure what you are really arguing here, the rule is what it is. Pogba falls short of being Home Grown by bit over a month. Nationality does not play a part in a player being home grown, because it would violate the law. We got Pogba when he was 16, so there is no issue with him being Home Grown had he spent enough time here because he would have developed with us.

The rule is intended to get clubs to use players developed within the two FA's. Now they don't have to be developed from the time they were 8 years old.

It is as arbitrary as any rule is, so what, not sure why that is an issue with you except you seem to want to argue everything in this thread today.

Not arguing anything. Just saying I think the spirit of the idea of home-grown players is diluted by the rule. That's all.
 
Has there been anything new at all? All this silence is killing me.
Nail on the head. I see two very different players there. I'd always prefer a Keane type player to a Vieria one. And as I said ages ago Pogba reminds me of Viera.

Why cant he be built like Vierra but play like Keane?
 
Can we keep all this homegrown chat to either a different thread, or wait to at least something is official.