itso 7
New Member
Who said anything about being grateful for their takeover? I'm just saying there is no need to fabricate nonexistent facts about how they are planning on looting all the money and leave the first team down to bones when recent history suggests they are doing it differently.So wait a second... Now United fans are supposed to be grateful that the unwanted owners who acquired the club for no other reason than to line their own pockets have finally, after years of frugality, sanctioned the spending of money the club generated itself!?
You'd think we were surviving on free transfers as a poor little plc and not breaking transfer records...
For purely selfish reasons their interests align with perfectly with those of the fans because a seriously successful Manchester United is a magnet for sponsors which grows revenues and ultimately the valud of the club. If the value of the club is high they can then sell off a small part of their stake for a considerable sum, equal or bigger than the initial money they used to acquire the club. If their model wasn't linked to success on the pitch Woodward wouldn't have been allowed to spend what he spent on Martial, for example, pursue players like Pogba and one of Moyes or Van Gaal would still be in a job. In comparison to Abramovich or Perez's antics I'm grateful we have them because, as clubs like Villa and Liverpool found out, it can be worse.
Finally rather than blaming the Glazers we should be laying blame where it belongs - the football administrators who slept on the ball re-football regulations and have allowed a legislative environment where clubs can be bought by the likes of the Glazers whilst the fans are rendered voiceless during the process. What happened to United would have happened eventus because the club was a sitting duck ripe for takeover from the day it was listed. We shouldn't derail the thread any further.