Why is Pogba's thread or all of his threads going haywire when all of these strangers to reality keep reminding us he is not the best mid or he isn't this and that.
I am no expert but from my calculations we started with 11 players against wolves, why concentrate on him
??
Other than Pogba having to learn to hold off niggling players like Neves and Marquinhos while finding space like Scholes there is no problem with him at all.
He should hold his head high and keep his consistency because there is no midfielder currently playing or in recent history who has ever shown a top level like Paul Pogba has, none.
Shaka Hislop says it better below :
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuXN-uysW48
With all due respect, I didn't watch the video however, I think your post cannot remain unanswered. What you have to remember is that Paul Pogba was bought because of what he could bring to the team. This was a new challenge not only for him, but also for us to see how he could cope with the rigours of a typical league season. Pogba seems to do quite well against the pretty good teams, but then either goes missing, or, he cannot be bothered to help his teammates against teams of inferior quality. In saying that, he reminds me so much of Jamie vardy, who is a player who is not scared of going against the big teams and scores too however, against teams that are average at best, he does go missing more often than not.
Therein lies the problem with Paul Pogba. He is too inconsistent to be labelled a "world class player", yes, he does some world class things with the ball, but when it comes to a 90 minute performance, then sometimes, he can be completely average at best. Again, I am not saying he is a terrible player, I do not think that and my argument isn't based on that either. However, when we look at the performances of Kevin DeBruyne, David Silva/Bernardo Silva, Iniesta, Scholes, Xavi or even Messi; these are players who kept their game simple i.e. they used their intelligence to decide when is the best time to launch a long diagonal and when it is time to play a simple pass.
Having watched Iniesta/Xavi and Iniesta over a long period of time, their game was simple; one touch and short. Paul cannot do that because he always tries to launch the ball long i.e. hollywood pass, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. If he wants to become the "world class player", that he thinks he is, he needs to get back to basics and try and do the simple things first. That is how Pep Guardiola managed to transform a pretty good City side into an excellent attacking force.
Anyway, back to your post and with the point about "niggling players." This is part and parcel of the game and he will have to adjust to it and if I remember correctly, each time he lost the ball, there was not one single fouled called which meant that those "niggling players", won the ball cleanly. Also, comparing him to Scholes is indeed an opinion, but can you justify that? Pogba maybe able to do things that Scholes can do, but there are a great number of things that Scholesy could do that Pogba could dream of doing. Anyway, that is besides the point and we can go on for ages about that.
As for the bolded statement and in blue, what do you actually imply by "keeping his consistency?" Isn't this where the problem lies with Paul Pogba? Players need to be consistent in their game no matter who the opposition is, and this is where your opinion breaks down, simply because he hasn't shown a level of consistency since he had a very bad game against Paris Saint Germain in the first match. From then on, he has been prolific i.e. consistently bad which doesn't help our midfield out. Remember, there are people who think Matic is terrible (and they may be justified in their opinion), so, when Matic and Pogba are together and playing "terribly", it doesn't inspire the rest of the team at all.
To summarise, each and every player who plays for Manchester United who don't perform to their maximum capacity need to actually apologise for their performances. They need to stand up and say, "ok, I didn't play well and I will take the responsibility for the goal that was scored." So, when a player implies or perhaps supporters who imply that he needs better players around him, shouldn't he first admit that he is playing badly instead of blaming everyone else? If Ole can take the blame (for deliberately taking out a player and saying "I had to do it") for his errors, then the players in the team should be able to assume their errors, and only then can we move forward.