Ok, you’ve tagged me in so I need to reply. I wasn’t going to add to the pile in but you’re having a shocker here. I’m sure a weasel could kill a newborn baby but this doesnt make it a dangerous animal. Trying to argue that a Jack Russel is somehow comparable to an XL Bully in terms of how dangerous they are to be around is like arguing that a weasel is as dangerous as a lion because they can both potentially kill a human. The second part of that sentence is true but the whole argument is absurd. Hence it is ridiculous to use that line of reasoning to argue that owning a weasel creates no more risk for people around you than owning a lion.
I'm not having a shocker. Jack Russells are not comparable to an XL Bully. Obviously XL's are bigger, stronger and could kill more easily. That's not what I was debating. My position is clear. I've said it numerous times, the absolute vast majority of dog attacks are absolutely down to poor owners or owners failures to prevent them. Be it abuse, lack of exercise, poor training, lack of experience or not recognising the signs their dog is going to react and this not preventing it happening.
Blaming a particular breed is insane as all dogs have the ability to kill or maul and seriously injure. Many, like Jack Russells were initially bred to kill. You essentially are bringing a wild animal with big teeth, power strength in to your home. I don't think many people appreciate that. Then through arrogance or ignorance or poor treatment it results in serious problems. Be it another dog mauled, or an adult or a child or like recently here a seal mauled because some moron let his staffy off a lead near a seal that was just chilling on a slipway, but of course the dog was at fault. Never blame the owner.
I don't give a shit about the pile on, I'm a big boy, I can handle it. And the majority of replies are baseless anyway. I may have worded things poorly last night, while I was at my staff party and pissed and stupidly made poor equations. However, my point still stands, and if people want to pick on minor faults in an argument or make stupid comparisons through pedantic comments rather than accept the actual bigger issue then fine. I'm not interested in semantics. Im defending good honest dog owners and dogs themselves. In truth, the many replies here just show me why there are so many dog attacks.
Dog attacks are on the rise and it's not just XL Bullies that are the issue, if you look at statistics it's nearly every single breed. I wonder, what's the one common denominator in all that?
Yes XL Bullies have more kills or maulings because they are the fashionable breed and sadly many owners have them for the wrong reasons. But if you ban them it will just be another breed. Probably Rottweilers, Huskies, Malamute's or German Shepherds or Dobermans, or even the poor Staffies that were public enemy number one back in the late 90's early 2000's.....
Are you going to ban them all too?
It's feck all like the gun scenario as someone else equated, and as a dog lover and owner for nearly 50 years, yes this is a hill I am prepared to die on. If people can't understand having a dog is a fecking huge responsibility and that to have one you have to understand them, train them, excecise them, stimulate their minds and not just walk them 10 mins a day and think they will be your guard dog and look after and protect you all, or make you look good because you carry it in a handbag then I can't help you. I feel far more sorry on a whole for these animals as at the root of all this there are tens of thousands of poor animals miserable and unhappy and primed to react then be blamed due to human arrogance and the belief that a dog is always a man's best friend. That is absolutely true, but as long as you treat respect and understand them correctly and remember they are a part of your family, not a status symbol.