Dr. Dwayne
Self proclaimed tagline king.
At least you're using more realistic terms like 'turned' now.
How often do we get done for pace? It’s rare.he cut inside him in his own half, hardly getting skinned. Regardless Bailly's pace enabled him to stay with him letting Maguire get back to make the tackle. Not sure why you are so reluctant to be happy we didn't get done for pace like we normally do
9-0 or 1-6 are not representative results, but in general one should be careful to just remove data. Even if we know that both those results were heavily depending on red cards, we still played super poor and super well in those two matches, so take away their contribution totally is not correct imo. Would we remove them if 5-0 and 1-4? Again that's why I like to look at patches and not focus so much on averages.
If we look at the whole season, the most common result is that we concede 0 goals in a match. The second most common is 1, and then 2.
We have conceded 2 goals in 6 matches but still managed to win 4 of them, 1 draw and 1 loss. This is obviously because we scored a lot of goals, and the price for the offensive football is often conceding more, like in the 6-2 game.
Goals conceded Number of games 0 8 1 7 2 6 3 2 6 1
If we look at the patch of 19 straight games I was talking about, it looks like this:
*Note that two of 2-goals conceded were the first matches in some time for Bailly and Tuanzebe.
Goals conceded Number of games 0 8 1 6 2 5*
When it comes to the DM covering part, we have scored most goals in the PL and many of those goals with both Fred and McT on the pitch. In general, we have not been playing defensive football. It has been mostly in the bigger matches where we have struggled to score, but kept clean sheets.
How often do we get done for pace? It’s rare.
I would say most of your examples are goals where we could and should have done better. However, the goals do not show that we need a fast CB to order to cover and compensate for Maguire’s lack of speed. If we look at the examples:It's pace but it's also our positional sense, so it's 2 issues really.We lack that recovery pace if/when we are caught out. Calvert Lewin done us for pace to cross for Docure's goal, de Gea messed up but pace got him into position to cross. Demba Ba, 35 yr old ran from half way to score against us, I'd argue their 2nd was pace related as well, how crucial was that loss in going out of CL. Lookman goal for Fulham. Barnes goal v Leicester, a reluctance to close him down due to his pace so he gets his shot of. Salah 1st for Lpool in FA cup, combination of poor pace and positioning. Bergwin last season for Spurs ran from nearly his own half. We don't close down quick enough at edge of our box, again afraid of pace, Shef Utd last goal, we stood of, Everton 2nd goal by Rodriguex, we stood of.In the modern game, not having recovery pace is a problem, we ask Maguire and Shaw especially to carry the ball forward, if/when they get caught upfield it's a problem. We are so deep at times it invites pressure I feel and it's compounded by De Gea's reluctance to come of his line. It is a collective issue , our mid can be slow in tracking runners, McT I think it was, was slow in closing down Grealish for the cross that led to Villas goal, Fred was slow in tracking Bergwin in that spurs goal. I just feel that 1 quick centre half can negate the poor positioning at times and offer a protection to defenders like Shaw and Maguire when they venture forward.
Brilliant post.
Thanks for the kind words.I made a similar point, though without the useful table of data, earlier today. Thank you for doing a vastly better job of it than I ever could.
As I survey the situation at hand, Bailly is a dream partner for Maguire, who I consider to be a very good CB. Lindelof can fill in ably, but he’s a steep drop from Bailly IMHO. What I’d like to see is Lindelof getting some starts over Maguire, who would benefit immensely from getting a break here and there. Maybe a Maguire/Bailly partnership and a Lindelof/Tuanzebe partnership? With Mengi waiting in the wings. I could live with that.
Much better since that atrocious Everton game. I think Maguire and Shaw have stepped up in particular to make it better. Lindelof seems to have developed something of a spine too.
In our 10 last matches we have kept 7 clean sheets. In all 3 matches where we conceded goals, we have conceded corner goals.
Leicester 3 goals conceded, 1 Corner goal
Milan, 1 goal conceded, it was corner goal
Newcastle 1 goal conceded, it was corner goal.
That means we have only conceded goals from open play in 1 match from our last 10 matches.
We have only conceded 2 goals in open play the last 10 matches and 1 of those 2 goals came from Fred’s poor pass.
It is a very solid defence but the team need to improve defending corners.
Does there exist such a snazzy graph for centre backs? I.e. tackles and aerial duels won, longer passing accuracy, even dribbles made?
Not that I've seen. Just this one for midfielders:
Interesting, still. Cheers. How long ago is this from, on the one hand it's got Eze and Harrison, but then it's got Naby Keita who pretty much seems to have retired by signing for Liverpool.
Just league games in the 20/21 season, where Keita has made 9 appearances.
It's not as good as the goalkeeper table really. Isn't even labelled properly.
Not that I've seen. Just this one for PL midfielders:
Thats weird. How is Mac Allister in there when he averages 1.5 tackles per 90 mins? Thats joint 6th in his team
No matter who plays we are vulnerable when the ball is crossed into the box, open play or set play it doesn't matter.
Lindelof is a waste of skin at centre half.
The plonkers who think he’s any good are as bad as the plonkers in Liverpool who used to try and pretend that Skrtel and Agger were any good. They were largely shite and so is Lindelof. Fella can’t even get into position to head the bloody ball.
no excuse for Shaw not busting a gut to stop the cross and obviously AWB completely oblivious to Welbeck
We struggle defensively at times - but at the same time - remove those first 3 games we played this season where we clearly weren't fit to play - and only City are better defensively than us - it's not all bad.
After 3 games we had a goal difference of 5-11 - in the next 27 games our goal difference has been 53-22 which is really good.
But the main problem imo is central midfield - Bruno and Pogba are useless as defenders. Notice how they never can put pressure on opponents - and a good midfielder simply glides past them.
Bruno makes loads of presses. You arent going to get much better from an attacker
no excuse for Shaw not busting a gut to stop the cross and obviously AWB completely oblivious to Welbeck
Lindelof and AWB were at fault. But if finger need to point at the original sin, it should be Pogba, for a careless pass straight to the opposition.
So Shaw's blameless then?
if you believe a full back should absolutely stop anyone from making a cross, then he is at fault. But the opposition wasn't given too much space nor time, and what about Henderson? Should he save the cross as well? compared with Pogba, Lindelof, AWB, IMO no his fault, whoever it was, was too minor.
The opposition clearly was given too much time and space because they got the cross in
I get it Shaw's flavour of the month and exempt from criticism
I just re watched that Brighton goal. The cross from Maupay was bang on. An inch closer to Shaw and it would have been blocked. An inch lower and Lindelof would have got it. An inch higher and it would have given WB a chance to get it. It fell bang on Welbeck. Ok maybe not an inch but point is sometimes you have to give credit for the attacking play. Could we have done better? Sure. All of them - Pogba, Shaw, Lindelof and WB. But its not glaring mistakes. Its mistakes that happen even with the best defense in the world.