nickm
Full Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2001
- Messages
- 9,662
Hard to say when he has a makeshift defence in front of him.
Doesn't help 3 out of starting back 4 is injured eh and non existant midfield. But yeah blame the new keeper. De Gea did years of the same mistakes so chill out. Some of our fan base are impatient mf'sAs per the title.
I don’t give a shit about how good he is with his feet or if he can pass, his primary objective is to keep the ball out of the net and he can’t do it.
The commentary mentioned tonight it’s the first season since the 70’s when Dave Sexton was manager that we have conceded 3 or more in 3 consecutive games. It’s not good enough.
Discuss
It’s not about being impatient, it’s about being alarmed at going backwards - especially when our start last season wasn’t great to begin with.Doesn't help 3 out of starting back 4 is injured eh and non existant midfield. But yeah blame the new keeper. De Gea did years of the same mistakes so chill out. Some of our fan base are impatient mf's
"Lobs" ? There was one single lob that was pretty much a worldie first time shot. If he was told to change his style based on one single world class lob, that would be beyond stupid.I feel like he’s been told to stay pretty much on his line now, maybe after those pre-season lobs, which is a shame as it takes away one of his main strengths
Well we don't know that, but we do know that he has been less willing to venture forward like he used to. It was a clear change from his first game or so of the season."Lobs" ? There was one single lob that was pretty much a worldie first time shot. If he was told to change his style based on one single world class lob, that would be beyond stupid.
Well IMO DDG got some unfair stick as well. He didnt command his 5 yard box neverthelessI’m giving him the same chance any player gets. Probably based on more games than those who were convinced he would revolutionise our game. De Gea didn’t get much benefit of the doubt playing behind Maguire and Lindelof. In fact he was blamed for making them worse.
I can't believe some are saying that we shouldn't have replaced De Gea. As a shot stopper, Onana isn't world class, but neither was the De Gea whose contract we decided to let run down. On top of that, Onana is a completely different level on the ball and some of these crosses he's dealt with has been great to see. There were a few high balls/corners last night that he punched away that De Gea would have shied away from. The claim against Wolves low down at the death amongst a crowd of bodies was terrific. Yes, he should have saved Sane's shot last night, but how many times last season should De Gea have saved shots that led to goals, without any of the positives that Onana brings?
Moving forward, the aim should be to do what any top side does and limit the amount of saves that Onana has to make. This will accentuate his world class attributes. I'm a bit concerned that he doesn't seem to be playing as high up as when he first signed. This tactical decision is counterproductive to the style of play we seemingly want to deploy.
There are some issues to consider. If you have very low shots against , that means the defense is great and those shots have very much lower chance to go in since the striker is under pressure, lower time to react, less time to position the goal attempt and many stressed factors. When you have many shots on target that means the defense leave great scoring positions to opposition, striker is under low pressure, the danger on each shot rises, more time to adjust and so on, less quality needed to score and you get more chances with higher and higher probability to score. There is a very clear correlation with lower chances offered and league position. Simple fact we relent so many shots on target against us means we suck at defense & mid and offer opposition much leeway to up the danger vs us. This requires shot stopping, not much else to it.Is this really unpopular, beginning to think most people see this now. I know he's faced a lot of shots he shouldn't have but he should have been doing better.
Do you watch Onana and think he has textbook technique when shot stopping?
Also, just to say he looks unusual doesn't mean he still can't be effective. Watch Moneyball, basically the whole premise for what they did was sign players that looked unusual but had good stats...... Unfortunately for Onana, his stats at the moment are also terrible which brings his unusual technique firmly in to question.
I watched him with Inter many a time and he made the same mistakes there.Unpopular given the start he's made? Stop being silly!
Let's just get behind him and hope he starts to show his Inter and Ajax form. That said, it doesn't help that our defence is porous this season, but he'll be the first one to tell you he's not been good enough.
There are some issues to consider. If you have very low shots against , that means the defense is great and those shots have very much lower chance to go in since the striker is under pressure, lower time to react, less time to position the goal attempt and many stressed factors. When you have many shots on target that means the defense leave great scoring positions to opposition, striker is under low pressure, the danger on each shot rises, more time to adjust and so on, less quality needed to score and you get more chances with higher and higher probability to score. There is a very clear correlation with lower chances offered and league position. Simple fact we relent so many shots on target against us means we suck at defense & mid and offer opposition much leeway to up the danger vs us. This requires shot stopping, not much else to it.
Problem is not with Onana, he is a known quantity, great with feet less so hands. Problem is with the club's over inflated self image to think we play in a way that is compatible with such a keeper. (It's not... yet). We are on path to a 140-180 shots on target against and if he can't maintain a 70+ save% then were looking at 8th or so finish.... I blame recruitment. Great keeper, wrong fit with us. Sure some argue we dont have the main back line, but arguably this IS the main backline since the "main" is more injured then not reality dictates this IS main.
Problem is he looked shaky even with Varane in front of him in our first three games.Pretty much playing like what I expected. Just because he is a 50M player with one of the top 5 keeper salaries in PL, doesn't mean he is no mistake player. Anyways, he is playing behind not looking fully fit Martinez and backup Lindelof. Can cut him some slack.
People expecting some kind of elite, out of the world keeper should revise their expectations.
that would be really funny if it wasn't true.Last year, our main problem was that we couldn't score goals. We got Onana. Now our main problem is not that we can't score goals!
Rip on him all you want but surley even you are aware that the back 4 is rubbish?
Yeah well DDG had numerous chances to improve during his 12 years spell at the club and was actually only world class at shot stopping while this guy hasnt really played that much in what can be considered the worst defence in our recent history.
Im not sayign he is better but at least give him a sample of games to judge him on
He isn't flawed. He is a very good goalkeeper.I was vocal here in pointing out how dumb it was to spend limited transfer funds to swap out one flawed keeper with another flawed keeper
I know it's early doors but after 6 games i reckon we've seen what he's about.
0 to Wolves (they are crap)
2 to spurs
2 to forest
3 to Arsenal
3 to brighton
4 to Bayern including a howler
He's not good enough. De Gea was our player of the match/month/season regularly and i imagine we'll be dropping a lot of points because Onana is in goal instead of De Gea.
I'm not saying all these goals are on him but even when i watch his technique it's not very inspiring. Some of the goals nobody was going to stop but still.
I know it's early doors but after 6 games i reckon we've seen what he's about.
0 to Wolves (they are crap)
2 to spurs
2 to forest
3 to Arsenal
3 to brighton
4 to Bayern including a howler
He's not good enough. De Gea was our player of the match/month/season regularly and i imagine we'll be dropping a lot of points because Onana is in goal instead of De Gea.
I'm not saying all these goals are on him but even when i watch his technique it's not very inspiring. Some of the goals nobody was going to stop but still.
That's not how i remember it. He's made some mistakes too but usually a certain "Maguire" was involved. Me? I'll take DDG all day over Onana but that's just my opinion. I'm not a hipster.De Gea was a liability most of the time are wouldnt have saved any of those goals we conceeded last night.
Onana is a decent keeper who has been written off for to soon.
De Gea was a liability most of the time are wouldnt have saved any of those goals we conceeded last night.
Onana is a decent keeper who has been written off for to soon.
Doesnt work for my area, can you describe the video? I'm open for debate, not saying i know it all.