Wait, so he became COO over the time period that City have refused to hand over records for?
Not necessarily. The CEO wouldn’t have a direct input on our footballing style or direction.Does this give an indication to our football direction long term? That's what we need a football style that managers and players alike will be signed to fit
Maybe. But let’s at least give the new leadership to a chance to make good moves. The least we can do is give them our support until they (Hoepfully not) prove themselves as incapable as the clown family.You're spot on but I don't know the guy that well so there's always the chance that he didn't do anything of note to begin with, successful system can contain subpar parts after all.
The feck are city going to gain spying over us?He’s a Citeh spy!
The under table payments to Mancini happened well before his time but I find it hard to believe any head of sponsorship couldn’t find the thread of more money incoming than what they were negotiating the least bit fishy.Wait, so he became COO over the time period that City have refused to hand over records for?
He was promoted by City to work on the footballing side and by us tasked to work on commercial and footballing side. Surely he'd have an idea of football style direction if city were seemingly harmonious on that front (wishful thinking on my part)Not necessarily. The CEO wouldn’t have a direct input on our footballing style or direction.
To me it most likely means that for once, the higher echelons of the club will finally be aligned, with Ineos at the Board, Berrada as CEO and they’ll probably bring in a DOF that will work with them.
So whatever football direction that will be decided by the board, they decided Berrada was the man who would be able to translate into the club/company‘s structure
I think that’s where we’re misunderstanding each other.
I’m not expecting a football man to be our CEO. I was simply pointing that to me he doesn’t fall in the category of football guys as he had no experience in the technical side of football operations.
He spent most of his career and honed his craft on the commercial side of operation. It simply means to me that the label « football man » is not the best one. JC Blanc by all accounts is very much not a football man, but proved to be a great CEO for a football company.
But by no means did I say this has any incidence on his competence or that I expect a football guy. The best CEOs I’ve worked with are generalists able to grasp the bigger picture rather than specialists of the field. It’s actually the same point I’ve been trying to make when people were bashing Arnold : him not being a football man does not equate not being a proper football CEO, his shiteness lied somewhere else.
He was promoted by City to work on the footballing side and by us tasked to work on commercial and footballing side. Surely he'd have an idea of football style direction if city were seemingly harmonious on that front (wishful thinking on my part)
Worst case, he gets banned from football and we find a new CEO.I don't think the 115 charges thing will be an issue for us. They will make sure to have clauses in the contract for things such as this. A no brainer.
Isnt it the Times that said he wasn't? To be fair it was probably the elephant in the room when we hired him.Was involved in the Haaland deal..haha.
All that under the table pay to the agent and daddy.
People trying hard to give reasons why he wasn't involved in City's shady dealings. Weird behaviour that.
Just copying Txiki, mate
My only question is why this happened now? Why would you go from a winning club to a giant that is struggling. If it is about new adventure, fair enough.
Is there something he knows about ManCity allegations?
Some people love the challenge. Also would be a big upgrade on his current position. And united is a real club also and not a fake plastic one.My only question is why this happened now? Why would you go from a winning club to a giant that is struggling. If it is about new adventure, fair enough.
Is there something he knows about ManCity allegations?
Definitely, gonna be a busy few months ahead for the them.Maybe. But let’s at least give the new leadership to a chance to make good moves. The least we can do is give them our support until they (Hoepfully not) prove themselves as incapable as the clown family.
We're gash at every single one of those things.He most recent job description:
Chief football operations officer at City Football Group overseeing talent management, performance services and football intelligence.
He needs a structure to do well.Let's give it a solid 12 months before we start hyping or writing of a CEO yeah?
My only question is why this happened now? Why would you go from a winning club to a giant that is struggling. If it is about new adventure, fair enough.
Is there something he knows about ManCity allegations?
Think of it more as making a very obvious signing I guess. He’s no doubt insanely expensive but I guess it’s risk mitigation by Ineos.That's how I see it too.
Even if he is, I'm guessing any consequences are far enough away that he'll have played his part in putting together a good system within the club (hopefully). We can then replace him with somebody who comes into a much stronger position than what he himself is doing atm.Anyone worried this will be like Spurs with the Italian guy, he comes then get sanctioned?