Mockney
Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Define 'men'?
Ross Kemp
Define 'men'?
clubS. His position was for the City group of clubs not just City.
You can say a lot of things about City, but they are well run with good people in position… or they’re replaced.
Between that and Ratcliffes track record for surrounding himself with good managers, it feels a good move
No, it is a promotion but he has been chief footballing officer for the whole city group. So his knowledge is football first which is much better for us.
Don’t think so if mean where he held specific title but COO is basically second to CEO…and of a huge group of clubs.
The day to day experience of a COO should help decisions made at CEO as he should understand them and be able to use his own experience to ok them.
Everyone who’s promoted to be made CEO of any club or any business ever, had a different role before?So, another learn on the job hire, then? Hopefully Blanc can be his mentor.
By offering them ridiculous amounts of money.How did we ever get Sanchez, Fred, Ronaldo and Billy McNeill?
Very impressive, I must say.
Now his first job must be to sack ETH.
Actually that name rings a bigger bell and you might be right. Is he the one the came at the same time as Txiti ?Aren't you thinking of Ferran Soriano as the other guy?
"Having won 32 trophies in the process."10 years from now….
“Manchester United relegated after being found guilty on charges of breaching FFP rules”
And without a media circus.He was COO at a club who's done well, and has a commercial background. I would have thought that'd make him a decent candidate for CEO. The only thing it indicates to me is that we're getting somebody who can organise the structure of the club (hence previous job as COO) rather than a pure finance person.
Blanc has only been CEO of INEOS’ sporting division for a year.So, another learn on the job hire, then? Hopefully Blanc can be his mentor.
I’d take that"Having won 32 trophies in the process."
Blanc has only been CEO of INEOS’ sporting division for a year.
Berrada has been the chief footballing officer of the best performing sporting group in football. He might need to learn a bit more about the sponsorship side, but he fully knows in depth how to run the footballing side of a club. The most important part. What more do you want?
Now United can sign star players without worrying FFP.
Blanc is on the board but is the CEO of INEOS’ sporting division. Berrada is the CEO of United. So will answer to the board, but manage the business and football side of United. On the business side he will be managing finance, marketing and sponsorships etc. On the footballing side likely the DOF, head of recruitment and Chief of negotiations will report to him (depending on how that structure is built - I’m basing that in the rumours that say figures like Ashworth will be DOG and Mitchell would be head of recruitment).Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Sir Dave Brailsford, Jean-Claude Blanc and now Omar Berrada.
It looks very interesting, but can anybody tell me what Blanc and Berrada will do respectively? I thought Blanc was supposed to be the CEO considering his previous experience.
BOOM!Now United can sign star players without worrying FFP.
Jean-Claude Blanc will continue to be CEO of all of INEOS Sport, overseeing new investment in Man United. He was probably too much of INEOS man for Glazers to be comfortable him becoming Man United CEO, as CEO should represent owners and they are still majority owners.Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Sir Dave Brailsford, Jean-Claude Blanc and now Omar Berrada.
It looks very interesting, but can anybody tell me what Blanc and Berrada will do respectively? I thought Blanc was supposed to be the CEO considering his previous experience.
Lets hope more City people come along
It will be like rats jumping off the Titanic once the charges stick. We should be there to pick up the pieces, if only to see the rabid responses on BM.Lets hope more City people come along
Everyone who’s been made CEO of any club or any business ever, had a different role before?
Every promotion for that matter.
Blanc has only been CEO of INEOS’ sporting division for a year.
Berrada has been the chief footballing officer of the best performing sporting group in football. He might need to learn a bit more about the sponsorship side, but he fully knows in depth how to run the footballing side of a club. The most important part. What more do you want?
Fair missed that he was CEO of Juve.He's previously been CEO of Juventus and the French Tennis ASsociateion. He's vastly experienced.
Best performing sporting group courtesy of a cheat code, so how will he handle having to make the finances work to comply with FFP or make sure that he keeps bringing in bigger and better sponsorship deals to ensure the club can meet its obligations, enhance its infrastructure and improve on the pitch?
If he doesn't have any experience as a CEO he may be great, may be ok or he may be woeful. Can United afford to take the chance? In its current state a club like United should be hiring experienced people to lift it out of the mire.
Fair missed that he was CEO of Juve.
City are only accused of not complying up to 2018. He was only in the relevant role from 2016 onwards. So yes maybe 2 years of impropriety, but they’ve been compliant for the last 5 years. (He is also not seen to be implicated in this)
We’re hiring an incredibly well regarded executive in the football world and you are immediately bringing the doom and gloom. Ever the pessimist.
Ever the pessimist.
Since 2018 we have spent more!Oh I'm not suggesting any involvement in impropriety, just that his experience has benefited from seemingly endless finances, he could struggle having to work with more restriction.
I am not!
Since 2018 we have spent more!
Man United hire someone a CEO with sporting experience 'we should have hired someone else'.
It will be like rats jumping off the Titanic once the charges stick. We should be there to pick up the pieces, if only to see the rabid responses on BM.
Don’t think so if mean where he held specific title but COO is basically second to CEO…and of a huge group of clubs.
The day to day experience of a COO should help decisions made at CEO as he should understand them and be able to use his own experience to ok them.
So ‘proper football men’ just means ‘men who worked at football clubs’ then?… even if those clubs were charged with financial impropriety in some of the areas they worked?
Doesn’t seem airtight to me. He’s no more of a ‘football man’ than Ed Woodward could claim to be.
I’m happy to be proved wrong but the excitement seems wildly desperate