croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,767
Because Ole is a serial winner.
Yeah that has definitely just made my eyes bleed seeing those two words alongside his name haha
Because Ole is a serial winner.
Yeah that has definitely just made my eyes bleed seeing those two words alongside his name haha
“Satisfactory standard” - we were supposed to be in a title race. We didn’t have to win it, only to be there or there abouts come seasons end.INCOMPETENT (According to Cambridge Business English Dictionar)
- lacking the skills or knowledge to do a job or perform an action correctly or to a satisfactory standard:
What’s coming with it is that almost everything else connected to a incompetent person will be labeled the same way. The way they talk, walk or even smiles. Our real enemies is our board. I have said this numerous times. The worst thing the Glazers has done is to not take action. Back him in public or sack him or this civil war will continue until something is done. Public backing from the owner is often the kiss of death in the corporate world but right now silence is the clubs worst enemy because is create wild speculations and divide our fan base.
I think people underestimate how easy it would be for a competent manager to have us in a title race at this moment in time.It is November. That’s already gone and now we are supposed to accept a top 4 finish? I personally don’t think we’ll get out of the CL group either but you cannot dress this up to be anything other than a lowering of expectations, due to incompetence within the hierarchies of the club. How much can we take?
I certainly don’t underestimate it. Had chelsea won their last game - 11 pts seems maybe too much to make up. But we had a window in which to act, a quite fortuitous one in fact. We did nothing. Now we are staring down the barrel of another wasted season.I think people underestimate how easy it would be for a competent manager to have us in a title race at this moment in time.
Given how bad we have been, Sunday league level performances nearly every game, a complete tactical mess and players downing tools on the manager, 12th in xPTS - we're currently 9 points off the top. All it would have taken is a manager who can organise the team to a professional level and have the actual faith of the players and you could reasonably expect we'd be 6+ points better off than we currently are, and we'd be right in the race.
I think people underestimate how easy it would be for a competent manager to have us in a title race at this moment in time.
Given how bad we have been, Sunday league level performances nearly every game, a complete tactical mess and players downing tools on the manager, 12th in xPTS - we're currently 9 points off the top. All it would have taken is a manager who can organise the team to a professional level and have the actual faith of the players and you could reasonably expect we'd be 6+ points better off than we currently are, and we'd be right in the race. We may not win it without upgrading certain areas of the team but there's no reason for us to be out of the race already.
By the time the new manager comes in they'll be walking into a mess of a situation, dressing room unrest, miles off top 4 and miles off 1st. Feel sorry for the poor bastard.
We clamp down on all childish names. Point out some we've not acted on if this is so true.
That's mostly what most of us are frustrated with. We seemingly have a fantastic squad playing below our ability. Problem is there isn't seem to be any competent manager willing to take over at this stage. We can complain about Ole all we want but if there is no one, there is no one.I think people underestimate how easy it would be for a competent manager to have us in a title race at this moment in time.
Imagine Ole performing like this at Bayern Munich and lasting 3 years. We are no longer a big club. Utterly depressing.
Not Arsenal. Surely Pep Lite has been abysmal, yet he's still here.Dude, he would have been fired at most clubs, never mind Bayern. Chelsea, City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Spurs, even Everton and Leicester would have sacked him by now. We're a laughing stock because we are the worst run club in Europe.
We aren’t a billion in the red and had to let go of the greatest player in our history because we couldn’t afford his wage. That’s to say nothing about the multitudes of clubs crippled by Covid or bad management that face liquidation or administration.Dude, he would have been fired at most clubs, never mind Bayern. Chelsea, City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Spurs, even Everton and Leicester would have sacked him by now. We're a laughing stock because we are the worst run club in Europe.
Diet Pep, sí?Surely Pep Lite has been abysmal
Not Arsenal. Surely Pep Lite has been abysmal, yet he's still here.
Literally just sacking Ole and not replacing him would improve us.That's mostly what most of us are frustrated with. We seemingly have a fantastic squad playing below our ability. Problem is there isn't seem to be any competent manager willing to take over at this stage. We can complain about Ole all we want but if there is no one, there is no one.
Not directed at you but in general, while I feel Ole is not competent to get the best out of the current team, some of the attacks on him personally are pretty brutal and personal. We are all frustrated but shouldn't they be directed at the board instead? If no one is available to take over mid-season and Ole is all we got, all these attacks (some over the top) are not going to help him turn it around.
Not directed at you but in general, while I feel Ole is not competent to get the best out of the current team, some of the attacks on him personally are pretty brutal and personal. We are all frustrated but shouldn't they be directed at the board instead?
Stolen from reddit, not sure about the accuracy of data though.
Why the feck does anyone care about ”per season” spending? Especially when the blue column took over a side that had won the league two seasons prior to his appointment.
According to those stats, Pep has spent 855 million from a clearly better position on his squad, Ole has spent 340 less from a worse position.
Have City spent better? Clearly, for the most part, but having a long term plan to bring in Pep, and have his old sporting directer from Barca arrive early and identify “Pep targets” a good year or two before Pep even arrived also skews those stats.
I believe the single biggest difference in the quality of the two squads is the management. Stick Ole at City for 3 years whilst we have Pep and we all know roles would be reversed.
That graph doesn't even make sense as the whole market has changed after 2017-18 season.
Aye, could have come directly from the Abu Dhabi PR machine.
City and Pep have spent loads more than Ole regardless, but it’s a red herring anyway, I really don’t think there’s a huge difference between the squad quality, City have much more quality in DM & full backs is all, United have lots more up top.
The gulf in class between the management is absolutely enormous though.
Aye, could have come directly from the Abu Dhabi PR machine.
City and Pep have spent loads more than Ole regardless, but it’s a red herring anyway, I really don’t think there’s a huge difference between the squad quality, City have much more quality in DM & full backs is all, United have lots more up top.
The gulf in class between the management is absolutely enormous though.
Agreed. Said it few times, manager changes the perception on how the squad is rated. Get a great one like Pep, your squad looks better than it is. Get an average one like Ole, squad looks worse than it is.
Why the feck does anyone care about ”per season” spending? Especially when the blue column took over a side that had won the league two seasons prior to his appointment.
According to those stats, Pep has spent 855 million from a clearly better position on his squad, Ole has spent 340 less from a worse position.
Have City spent better? Clearly, for the most part, but having a long term plan to bring in Pep, and have his old sporting directer from Barca arrive early and identify “Pep targets” a good year or two before Pep even arrived also skews those stats.
I believe the single biggest difference in the quality of the two squads is the management. Stick Ole at City for 3 years whilst we have Pep and we all know roles would be reversed.
FFS, Wibble, we used to mock RAWK for this type of crap.
Trend of being diplomatic and using velvet gloves when talking about certain special "one of us" individuals? Yes of course.Trend continues.
Trend of being diplomatic and using velvet gloves when talking about certain special "one of us" individuals? Yes of course.
Yeah that's the point, City have the money and they spent it well and have good management, that's why they have been more successful since the UAE takeover. While United's just continue to just spend money without long term plan.
Spending big does not guarantee success when the management does not know where to spend it. While if you give good manager like Pep money, he'll win the league, and that's proven
Hmm, I honestly thought that the graph try to portray how effective City's signings are compared to United. Especially if we see that most of LVG and Mou's signing are no longer at the clubIt’s not the point though as I still maintain the spending vs squad quality is a red herring, which is how that graph frames it.
The sole focus should be on the managers.
Oh. You need it to be spelt out. I see.Saying Ole isn't good enough and should be sacked is being diplomatic?
Hmm, I honestly thought that the graph try to portray how effective City's signings are compared to United. Especially if we see that most of LVG and Mou's signing are no longer at the club
Well out of 20 players that LVG and Mou bought, 12 are not in the club anymore, not sure if that's majority or not.Over the past 5 seasons we still have a shit load of our signings too.
How are “most of Mourinho’s no longer at the club”?
Matic, Bailly, Fred, Dalot, Lindelöf, Pogba.
And why do LVG’s matter when the graph only take into consideration 5 seasons of Pep?
Once again, I see it as a red herring, the “effectiveness” of City’s signings are due to the great management, and vice versa for United.