- Joined
- Jan 2, 2018
- Messages
- 382
Well not to be pedantic, what I call impatience can also accurately be described as naive, spoilt opinions of fans too demanding for instant success to see the wood for the trees and notice the very obvious improvements the current manager has implemented since he arrived on and off the pitch, our consistent improvement season on season and the painfully obvious improved direction for the club.
Comparing managers in cup competitions is almost entirely pointless.
How many times has Ole beaten Tuchel? That argument is every bit as flawed as comparing them in knockout competitions.
Or perhaps compare the two initial 4-5 month periods each manager had upon their arrival in the PL? Again same logic. Ole wins them all except a cup competition comparison.
This is the same naive approach many take to comparing managers and subsequently underrating our own.
Nobody claims the improvements under Ole have been done in light-speed time, but the improvements have been there from the start.
There is a big difference between having ‘blind faith’ and being observant.
I agree that comparing managers in cup competitions is pointless but if we hypothetically lost against Roma, questions needed to be ask.
I get that at a cup competition you may qualify or not for various reasons (form, rotation, coaching, player fatigue and so) but as I said if Roma got through us, then Ole (or whoever is the manager) clearly does something wrong. We're not West Brom or a team like that, we are one of the richest and more powerful clubs worldwide.
I couldn't care less how many times Ole beat Pep, Tuchel or Poch or whomever. A great coach is a great coach. Ole has beaten Pep 4 or 5 times but Pep is still the greatest manager of his generation. Being beaten by Ole doesn't prove anything. For example I can't rate Moyes based on a freak season or because maybe won against City, United, Chelsea...
I'm not trying to under-rate Ole, maybe he was just what United needed at the time. He is not the PE teacher some were saying but also for me he is nothing special to hang on to just because he is a legend of the club.
Just wondering who you might seem suitable as a proven manager for united? Poch? Not even winning Ligue 1at the moment. As an outsider I'd say he's done a tremendous job getting rid of deadwood and starting a rebuild, all along having the players on his side, which is not easy to do.
Btw we're also getting a manager that has never really won anything, and still I'm excited for what Nagelsmann can bring to Bayern. Accolades aren't everything.
I don't know who would be best for United, that's a job for the specialists, data analysts and football directors of the club.
As a personal preference I rate Poch, Nagelsmann, Tuchel, Rodgers, of course Pep and Klopp. (I'm aware of all the criticism that will be heading my way for either one of those).
I believe every one of the above would do a great job for the long term except Tuchel (great football but he gets in constant fights with the owners, directors and so he wouldn't last over 2/3 years and of course he won't at Chelsea)