Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
feck that, he probably knows where I live and will be a step aheadRado....
feck that, he probably knows where I live and will be a step aheadRado....
Anything better or equal to top 4 would be good in the first season. LvG will claim to have lowered expectations ready for him and he should be thankful.
I'm expecting a title challenge. The players we have really aren't as bad as have been made out this past season, IMO.
The thing is. Jose net spend is actually less than moyes and lvg combined. And that's all time net spend.
Even if you put ronaldo on his tab he make a good purchase.
Nope. They have never shown that they are interested on getting significant dividends from the club. The plan all along was making the value of the club high and then when needed sell stocks. Even under Moyes, we offered more than Madrid to Bale, so the Moyes was the cheap option makes sense only in 'Glazers are evil and we hate Glazers so they are to blame for everything, but because we know that Fergie made this choice, we have to make something up even if it goes against any fact' agenda.
So far!
That has pretty much nothing to do with my post.Em. Ok. Haven't they withdrawn tons from the club? No?
Em. Ok. Haven't they withdrawn tons from the club? No?
Woody is creaming himself right now.
Is there a reason there aren't any more pictures/interviews so far?
Is there a reason there aren't any more pictures/interviews so far?
He's a crafty dangerous proposition alright.feck that, he probably knows where I live and will be a step ahead
That has pretty much nothing to do with my post.
I agree @devilish. That's the point I'm making. Strange that some can't see the Glazers (wrongly) thought Moyes made financial sense.
The glazers wouldn't have known that Everton let alone moyes existed. Why would they? They are not football fans. They asked guidance to their football directors and they got it. Charlton and saf aren't there for cheerleading. Once they failed they starting having doubts on the football people and relying more on woody. Since woody failed too they are probably flirted with the idea of dof
Saf himself said that they don't mess with football decisions
You are joking? Aren't you. Dev I'll be honest I ain't able to get into this now. But I don't agree.
Interesting article by Andy Dunn in the Mirror, the main thrust of the story after he made it clear Mourinho shafted LvG, was that United will have to take a back seat because it will all be about Mourinho now, and if it lasts more than three years it'll be a miracle.
I'm not sure myself, Mourinho must know he needs to adjust slightly now, after all this is the job he always wanted, and more than likely he must know that after this job his options will be limited unless he wants to go over old ground again, I may end up disappointed but I think we will see a different Jose at United.
Dividends are different to paying debt/interest.I thought you said they have never shown any desire to withdraw dividends from the club? Maybe I misread you.
Isn't Dunn a scouser? If so then I wouldn't take anything he says about us even remotely seriously. If I'm mixing him and he isn't actually a scouser, then I apologise to him for my error, but basically the same applies - a football hack's opinion is utterly meaningless.
Dividends are different to paying debt/interest.
I think our Midfield is the area who suffered most under LVG. Obviously we didn't score goals, but we see the quality in Martial/Rashford and potential quality in Memphis.
Those three, a winger and a defender and we're set for dominationHas anyone alluded to the fact that, of the 10 people he's following on instagram, 3 are Kane, Pogba and Ibrahimovic?
That's a fake profile.Has anyone alluded to the fact that, of the 10 people he's following on instagram, 3 are Kane, Pogba and Ibrahimovic?
That's a fake profile.
https://www.instagram.com/josemourinho/ is the legit one. He follows mostly family.
Those three, a winger and a defender and we're set for domination
Feck we would be close already with those three alone.
Yes he's a scouser, he does come across ok on The Sunday Supplement though, but his point is just the general sound bite amongst most journos right now, convinced he'll win us something, convinced he'll get up to his usual tricks, and convinced it'll last three years max.
There's worse examples of that kind of thinking around:Insightful journalism really. Struggle to get anything concrete as actual quotes so instead just write an opinion piece based on historical events. Takes real insight and consideration to say "everything that happened before will happen again".
Guardian said:José Mourinho is seen as a route to title but 128 years of history are against him
As Mourinho arrives at Manchester United, he has to buck a trend in English football where only four managers have won the league with more than one club:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2016/may/27/jose-mourinho-manchester-united-title-history