Boycott
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2013
- Messages
- 6,331
That's dedication
Imagine how much detail we'll see if Aldo gets to the final
Imagine how much detail we'll see if Aldo gets to the final
Tendulkar's peak can be summed up by desert storm. It doesn't matter who the attack is when he plays well.
I don't necessarily agree. His quality was also his mental state. You can say he single handedly changed the mentality of Indian cricket, and until the 2000s was a one man team. If he got out, the team instantly lost in most cases. No other ODI great has had that sort of pressure. He didn't have more "on" days. He was simply better than everybody bar Viv in ODIs IMO. Him and Viv are equal. None of the modern ODI greats (Kohli/ABD etc.) have to deal with that sort of pressure everyday. You have to account for it.Tbf you can say that about everyone, his quality was that he had more on days than anyone else.
Didn't really have as much time as I would have hoped so did the best I could. Loads of remaining talking points. I'll get more involved in some time.That's dedication
Imagine how much detail we'll see if Aldo gets to the final
What is the target you are likely to set for me in this game?Dismissing Sachin in the first over of a World Cup final with a huge target to chase,
And Ando's team is relying heavily on the explosive start his openers make, with a solid innings in the middle and then the grand finish at the end. But that's not going to happen. Of the top 6, the only players I can imagine having a good game here for them are his two Aussie mates. His 3-4 is quite weak and Yuvraj may have to make his appearance much sooner than expected. Add to this, Yuvi's record is not so great, and it is really an uphill task for Team Ando to chase the game.
Honestly, I have no idea. There have been games with low scores and those with High scores. So I am very Honest in saying that I don't know. We mentioned in the write-up (Which apparently no one bothers to read) we could have what it takes to get a score over 300.What is the target you are likely to set for me in this game?
You have to look at the context mate. I don't deny they are fantastic cricketers. But to think they are absolutely flawless and can never be outdone/outsmarted is also a little over the top don't you think ?Only on the Caf cricket draft could this be said about a batting attack that includes Sachin and Yuvraj. Can't even imagine either having a good game eh Ijazz?
I don't necessarily agree. His quality was also his mental state. You can say he single handedly changed the mentality of Indian cricket, and until the 2000s was a one man team. If he got out, the team instantly lost in most cases. No other ODI great has had that sort of pressure. He didn't have more "on" days. He was simply better than everybody bar Viv in ODIs IMO. Him and Viv are equal. None of the modern ODI greats (Kohli/ABD etc.) have to deal with that sort of pressure everyday. You have to account for it.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with this. I'm not talking in the context of the game, but in general. Pressure in not quantifiable by any means and it is how a person takes it that matters. Just because the likes of AbD and Kohli handle that pressure differently to how the likes of Sachin dealt with it, doesn't mean they are worse than him at dealing with it. If Sachin lost a game for India, how many Indians do you think would backlash ? And if Kohli did the same, what do you think the response would be ?None of the modern ODI greats (Kohli/ABD etc.) have to deal with that sort of pressure everyday. You have to account for it.
I don't see anyone calling Sachin or yuvraj flawless or invincible. It's you who went the full hilt the other way by saying the only players you could even imagine having a good game were waugh and symonds.Honestly, I have no idea. There have been games with low scores and those with High scores. So I am very Honest in saying that I don't know. We mentioned in the write-up (Which apparently no one bothers to read) we could have what it takes to get a score over 300.
You have to look at the context mate. I don't deny they are fantastic cricketers. But to think they are absolutely flawless and can never be outdone/outsmarted is also a little over the top don't you think ?
We were a 1 man team during most of Sachin's career. Sachin at the wicket = win, Sachin out = loss. None of Kohli, Dhoni, and etc have that kind of pressure. NM isn't referring to how they deal with pressure but to the insane pressure in itself.I'm sorry but I have to disagree with this. I'm not talking in the context of the game, but in general. Pressure in not quantifiable by any means and it is how a person takes it that matters. Just because the likes of AbD and Kohli handle that pressure differently to how the likes of Sachin dealt with it, doesn't mean they are worse than him at dealing with it. If Sachin lost a game for India, how many Indians do you think would backlash ? And if Kohli did the same, what do you think the response would be ?
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with this. I'm not talking in the context of the game, but in general. Pressure in not quantifiable by any means and it is how a person takes it that matters. Just because the likes of AbD and Kohli handle that pressure differently to how the likes of Sachin dealt with it, doesn't mean they are worse than him at dealing with it. If Sachin lost a game for India, how many Indians do you think would backlash ? And if Kohli did the same, what do you think the response would be ?
Thanks Skills. Didn't think there would be much movement in SA though. And had no Idea SL was better for the spinners than India, no wonder Herath is such a legend.Personally these are the factors that come to my mind for each country:
- Australia - Quick, bouncy but overall batsmen friendly ground. Massive boundaries - so you need good runners between wickets, as you might not get full value for your shots (good runners will benefit).
- England - some movement early on, generally flat and batsmen friendly after.
- India - flat pitches, very quick outfields. Poor SG ball.
- Pakistan - Quick, but overall batsmen friendly. Reverse swing is a factor.
- Sri Lanka - slow, low pitches. More spinner friendly than either India or Pakistna.
- South Africa - see England + high altitude. Easier to clear boundaries.
- New Zealand - swinging and seaming pitches. Very short boundaries, really quick outfields.
- West Indies - see Pakistan.
I did get that. That's why I said you cannot quantify pressure. The pressure Sachin feels is a lot different to what Abd or Kohli feels. And about responsibility, I hate to bring this up but, Sachin's batting form as Captain was nowhere close to being good enough. He crumbled under that pressure if I recall correctly. It's still too early to judge how Kohli might perform, so I can't be sure.Don't think I was clear in what I said - None of them had to deal with AS MUCH pressure and responsibility as he did. Neither are a one man team.
?219.
He clearly doesn't need one. Probably has the fields decided for every over too.Aldo you had never mentioned your Captain mate.
Nope he got shot dead on turn 1 .?
Playing WW and counting the number of posts you made there Varun ?
Oh, yeah! Serves him right for giving a reaction when I was threadbanned.Nope he got shot dead on turn 1 .
Very unusual take you have there @prath92. You acknowledge the shortcomings of either teams in the conditions, but then go onto say that Sachin might not get dismissed at all ? Especially when he has a history of losing his wicket more frequently to 4 of our bowlers than any other set of bowlers in the history of ODI cricket?! And they have taken his wicket on flat or batsmen friendly surface. And as for Waugh, we admitted in the write-up, trying to contain him would be more difficult, but we believe this is where Mushy will be crucial. His record in NZ is far better than his overall record and him and Murali are among the two most notable spinners that have taken his wicket with consistency. When you add those two up, it seems inevitable that Mushy will pick up Waugh's wicket. How much he will score before that, I don't know though.
219?
Playing WW and counting the number of posts you made there Varun ?
Lol, if you say so bud.
Yep.
Very unusual take you have there @prath92. You acknowledge the shortcomings of either teams in the conditions, but then go onto say that Sachin might not get dismissed at all ? Especially when he has a history of losing his wicket more frequently to 4 of our bowlers than any other set of bowlers in the history of ODI cricket?! And they have taken his wicket on flat or batsmen friendly surface. And as for Waugh, we admitted in the write-up, trying to contain him would be more difficult, but we believe this is where Mushy will be crucial. His record in NZ is far better than his overall record and him and Murali are among the two most notable spinners that have taken his wicket with consistency. When you add those two up, it seems inevitable that Mushy will pick up Waugh's wicket. How much he will score before that, I don't know though.
But it's not as simple as that is it ? You call it playing intelligently, I call it playing slowly. McGrath and Fanie are Dot ball specialists. So if we do amass a good score like we hope to, you can't expect both of them to just sit there and see out the first few overs. They will have to challenge the bowlers, or go after one of them. McGrath is a top order specialist by default. Almost all of his major scalps have been the top order. So to think that he won't pick up an early wicket in his opening spell doesn't do his career justice.He has been dismissed twice by De Villiers. Troubled sachin often yes but dismissing him twice isnt that many though. Mcgrath yes dismissed but going by the records of Cronje and Anderson while bowling here, its highly unlikely they will take his wicket, especially considering they will come on only after at least the 10th over by which time if they are still there, then getting them out is very difficult. So basically all they have to do is play intelligently and see the opening bowlers off without playing rashly which isnt too much to expect from experienced batsmen like Waugh and Sachin.
But it's not as simple as that is it ? You call it playing intelligently, I call it playing slowly. McGrath and Fanie are Dot ball specialists. So if we do amass a good score like we hope to, you can't expect both of them to just sit there and see out the first few overs. They will have to challenge the bowlers, or go after one of them. McGrath is a top order specialist by default. Almost all of his major scalps have been the top order. So to think that he won't pick up an early wicket in his opening spell doesn't do his career justice.
And also De Villiers took Sachin's wicket 4 times. not twice.
List of dismissals
Edit:
Ian Bell and Younis Khan would never make anyone's Proper team, mate. No offence.Anyways, jokes aside, before I drink some beer.
I think we have a proper ODI team.
2 absolutely top drawer openers, one of them being Sachin himself, a solid 3-4 to build the innings alongside these openers, superb finishers to chase whatever total is set for us supported by pinch hitters right till the tail end of the side.
On the bowling side, we have one of the best strike bowlers in Bond. I'm sure people know enough about him to not need a reminder. Supporting him are Gul and Streak, 2 very good bowlers. We then have larsen who was a miser with the ball and really suited to keeping the middle overs tight. We then have the like software yuvi and symonds as the 5th bowler with spin or medium pace.
We are also a very good fielding side which is important in ODIs.
Cronje vs Sachin is above all that playing condition, its a kind of mental block.He has been dismissed twice by De Villiers. Troubled sachin often yes but dismissing him twice isnt that many though. Mcgrath yes dismissed but going by the records of Cronje and Anderson while bowling here, its highly unlikely they will take his wicket, especially considering they will come on only after at least the 10th over by which time if they are still there, then getting them out is very difficult. So basically all they have to do is play intelligently and see the opening bowlers off without playing rashly which isnt too much to expect from experienced batsmen like Waugh and Sachin.